急诊科转院是否需要专科会诊或入院?

Erin L. Simon , Adriana Morra , Kristen Septaric , Courtney M. Smalley , Jessica Krizo , Caroline Mangira , Baruch S. Fertel
{"title":"急诊科转院是否需要专科会诊或入院?","authors":"Erin L. Simon ,&nbsp;Adriana Morra ,&nbsp;Kristen Septaric ,&nbsp;Courtney M. Smalley ,&nbsp;Jessica Krizo ,&nbsp;Caroline Mangira ,&nbsp;Baruch S. Fertel","doi":"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2023.100035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>When emergency department (ED) patients require a higher level of care, transferring patients for specialized services to another ED may be needed. Previous studies have characterized risks and cost factors involved with transfers; however, few have evaluated the appropriateness of transfers.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine if a specialty consultation or admission was required for ED-to-ED transfers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective cohort of all adult patients aged 18 and older who presented one of 17 EDs between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, and were transferred to another ED within the healthcare system. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviations or median and quartiles. Multiple logistic regression was utilized to determine if the variables collected were predictive of hospital admission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 7486 encounters were included in the study. The mean age of participants was 54. Most patients were white (76.5%), male (50.6%), and had private insurance (39.0%). At the receiving ED, 64.0% (n ​= ​4750) received a specialty consult, and 61.3% (n ​= ​4549) were admitted to inpatient services. A total of 1430 (19.3%) patients did not receive a specialty consult and were discharged from the ED.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The majority all ED-to-ED transfers involved a specialty consultation, and 61.3% of patients transferred were admitted to the hospital. Further research to determine why patients did not require specialty consultation or admission may help reduce unnecessary transfers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73546,"journal":{"name":"JEM reports","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do emergency department transfers require specialist consultation or admission?\",\"authors\":\"Erin L. Simon ,&nbsp;Adriana Morra ,&nbsp;Kristen Septaric ,&nbsp;Courtney M. Smalley ,&nbsp;Jessica Krizo ,&nbsp;Caroline Mangira ,&nbsp;Baruch S. Fertel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2023.100035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>When emergency department (ED) patients require a higher level of care, transferring patients for specialized services to another ED may be needed. Previous studies have characterized risks and cost factors involved with transfers; however, few have evaluated the appropriateness of transfers.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine if a specialty consultation or admission was required for ED-to-ED transfers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective cohort of all adult patients aged 18 and older who presented one of 17 EDs between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, and were transferred to another ED within the healthcare system. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviations or median and quartiles. Multiple logistic regression was utilized to determine if the variables collected were predictive of hospital admission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 7486 encounters were included in the study. The mean age of participants was 54. Most patients were white (76.5%), male (50.6%), and had private insurance (39.0%). At the receiving ED, 64.0% (n ​= ​4750) received a specialty consult, and 61.3% (n ​= ​4549) were admitted to inpatient services. A total of 1430 (19.3%) patients did not receive a specialty consult and were discharged from the ED.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The majority all ED-to-ED transfers involved a specialty consultation, and 61.3% of patients transferred were admitted to the hospital. Further research to determine why patients did not require specialty consultation or admission may help reduce unnecessary transfers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JEM reports\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JEM reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232023000317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232023000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当急诊科(ED)患者需要更高水平的护理时,可能需要将接受专门服务的患者转移到另一急诊科。以前的研究描述了转让所涉及的风险和成本因素;但是,很少有人评价转移的适当性。目的本研究的目的是确定ed到ed的转移是否需要专科咨询或入院。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2018年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在17个急诊科就诊的所有18岁及以上成年患者,这些患者被转移到医疗保健系统内的另一个急诊科。分类变量以频率和百分比表示。连续变量以平均值和标准差或中位数和四分位数表示。使用多元逻辑回归来确定收集的变量是否预测住院。结果共纳入7486例病例。参与者的平均年龄为54岁。大多数患者为白人(76.5%),男性(50.6%),有私人保险(39.0%)。在接收急诊科,64.0% (n = 4750)的患者接受了专科会诊,61.3% (n = 4549)的患者接受了住院服务。共有1430例(19.3%)患者未接受专科会诊而出院。结论绝大多数急诊科转急诊科患者都进行了专科会诊,61.3%的转急诊科患者住院。进一步的研究,以确定为什么患者不需要专科咨询或入院可能有助于减少不必要的转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do emergency department transfers require specialist consultation or admission?

Background

When emergency department (ED) patients require a higher level of care, transferring patients for specialized services to another ED may be needed. Previous studies have characterized risks and cost factors involved with transfers; however, few have evaluated the appropriateness of transfers.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to determine if a specialty consultation or admission was required for ED-to-ED transfers.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort of all adult patients aged 18 and older who presented one of 17 EDs between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, and were transferred to another ED within the healthcare system. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviations or median and quartiles. Multiple logistic regression was utilized to determine if the variables collected were predictive of hospital admission.

Results

A total of 7486 encounters were included in the study. The mean age of participants was 54. Most patients were white (76.5%), male (50.6%), and had private insurance (39.0%). At the receiving ED, 64.0% (n ​= ​4750) received a specialty consult, and 61.3% (n ​= ​4549) were admitted to inpatient services. A total of 1430 (19.3%) patients did not receive a specialty consult and were discharged from the ED.

Conclusion

The majority all ED-to-ED transfers involved a specialty consultation, and 61.3% of patients transferred were admitted to the hospital. Further research to determine why patients did not require specialty consultation or admission may help reduce unnecessary transfers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JEM reports
JEM reports Emergency Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
期刊最新文献
A rare case of yellow nail syndrome in the emergency room setting: A case report Spontaneous perinephric hematoma in an emergency department patient with flank pain: A case report Symptomatic complete heart block: A rare complication of anterior myocardial infarction in a young, fit male: A case report Case of monocular visual impairment Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A rare presenting sign of pediatric hypothyroidism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1