极化和回音室?在日常生活中利用社交媒体理解气候问题

IF 2 Q2 COMMUNICATION Nordicom Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2478/nor-2023-0002
Hallvard Moe, S. Lindtner, Brita Ytre-Arne
{"title":"极化和回音室?在日常生活中利用社交媒体理解气候问题","authors":"Hallvard Moe, S. Lindtner, Brita Ytre-Arne","doi":"10.2478/nor-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyses how people use social media to make sense of climate change, exploring climate issues as part of everyday communication in media-saturated societies. Building on prominent themes in the environmental communication literature on social media, such as mobilisation and polarisation, we respond to calls for more qualitative and interpretative analysis. Our study therefore asks how people use social media in everyday life to make sense of climate issues, and it expands on previous findings in the field through a qualitative typology of everyday social media use. The empirical data stems from in-depth interviews with Norwegians who are engaged in climate issues, with informants ranging from activists to declared sceptics, although we find widespread ambivalence across group positions. Our findings contribute to disentangling contradictory findings in the field through a discussion of how climate change is part of everyday communication.","PeriodicalId":45517,"journal":{"name":"Nordicom Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polarisation and echo chambers? Making sense of the climate issue with social media in everyday life\",\"authors\":\"Hallvard Moe, S. Lindtner, Brita Ytre-Arne\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/nor-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article analyses how people use social media to make sense of climate change, exploring climate issues as part of everyday communication in media-saturated societies. Building on prominent themes in the environmental communication literature on social media, such as mobilisation and polarisation, we respond to calls for more qualitative and interpretative analysis. Our study therefore asks how people use social media in everyday life to make sense of climate issues, and it expands on previous findings in the field through a qualitative typology of everyday social media use. The empirical data stems from in-depth interviews with Norwegians who are engaged in climate issues, with informants ranging from activists to declared sceptics, although we find widespread ambivalence across group positions. Our findings contribute to disentangling contradictory findings in the field through a discussion of how climate change is part of everyday communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordicom Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordicom Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordicom Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文分析了人们如何利用社交媒体来理解气候变化,探讨了在媒体饱和的社会中,气候问题是日常沟通的一部分。基于社交媒体上环境传播文献中的突出主题,如动员和两极分化,我们回应了更多定性和解释性分析的呼吁。因此,我们的研究询问人们如何在日常生活中使用社交媒体来理解气候问题,并通过日常社交媒体使用的定性类型学扩展了该领域先前的发现。经验数据源于对参与气候问题的挪威人的深入采访,从活动家到公开的怀疑论者,尽管我们发现群体立场之间普遍存在矛盾。通过讨论气候变化如何成为日常交流的一部分,我们的发现有助于解开该领域相互矛盾的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polarisation and echo chambers? Making sense of the climate issue with social media in everyday life
Abstract This article analyses how people use social media to make sense of climate change, exploring climate issues as part of everyday communication in media-saturated societies. Building on prominent themes in the environmental communication literature on social media, such as mobilisation and polarisation, we respond to calls for more qualitative and interpretative analysis. Our study therefore asks how people use social media in everyday life to make sense of climate issues, and it expands on previous findings in the field through a qualitative typology of everyday social media use. The empirical data stems from in-depth interviews with Norwegians who are engaged in climate issues, with informants ranging from activists to declared sceptics, although we find widespread ambivalence across group positions. Our findings contribute to disentangling contradictory findings in the field through a discussion of how climate change is part of everyday communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordicom Review
Nordicom Review COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
10
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Active spectating in the digital public sphere: A qualitative exploration Curators of digital counterpublics: Mapping alternative news environments in Sweden and Denmark What makes the difference? Social media platforms and party characteristics as contextual factors for political parties’ use of populist political communication Online discussion threads as promotors of citizen democracy: Current opportunities and challenges for small- and medium-sized media organisations in Finland Second thoughts on digital first: Exploring the development of election campaigning among Swedish political parties, 2010–2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1