数字创新外包的边界与跨越:制度逻辑与治理体系的影响

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Systems Management Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1080/10580530.2022.2130480
Jennifer Jewer, Bui K. Petersen, Ray Gosine, Peter J. Warrian
{"title":"数字创新外包的边界与跨越:制度逻辑与治理体系的影响","authors":"Jennifer Jewer, Bui K. Petersen, Ray Gosine, Peter J. Warrian","doi":"10.1080/10580530.2022.2130480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Through a case study in the offshore oil and gas sector, we provide evidence from client, vendor, and governance systems actors on how divergent logics between clients and vendors give rise to a logics boundary that reduces the client’s propensity to outsource digital innovation. However, we found that different types of governance systems can institute boundary spanning activities to address the key logics’ dimensions that can attenuate or amplify the logics barrier.","PeriodicalId":56289,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boundaries and Boundary Spanning in Digital Innovation Outsourcing: The Influence of Institutional Logics and Governance Systems\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Jewer, Bui K. Petersen, Ray Gosine, Peter J. Warrian\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10580530.2022.2130480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Through a case study in the offshore oil and gas sector, we provide evidence from client, vendor, and governance systems actors on how divergent logics between clients and vendors give rise to a logics boundary that reduces the client’s propensity to outsource digital innovation. However, we found that different types of governance systems can institute boundary spanning activities to address the key logics’ dimensions that can attenuate or amplify the logics barrier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2022.2130480\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2022.2130480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要通过对海上石油和天然气行业的案例研究,我们从客户、供应商和治理系统参与者那里提供了证据,证明客户和供应商之间的不同逻辑如何产生逻辑边界,从而降低客户外包数字创新的倾向。然而,我们发现,不同类型的治理系统可以进行跨越边界的活动,以解决关键逻辑的维度,这些维度可以削弱或放大逻辑障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boundaries and Boundary Spanning in Digital Innovation Outsourcing: The Influence of Institutional Logics and Governance Systems
ABSTRACT Through a case study in the offshore oil and gas sector, we provide evidence from client, vendor, and governance systems actors on how divergent logics between clients and vendors give rise to a logics boundary that reduces the client’s propensity to outsource digital innovation. However, we found that different types of governance systems can institute boundary spanning activities to address the key logics’ dimensions that can attenuate or amplify the logics barrier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Systems Management
Information Systems Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information Systems Management (ISM) is the on-going exchange of academic research, best practices, and insights based on managerial experience. The journal’s goal is to advance the practice of information systems management through this exchange. To meet this goal, ISM features themed papers examining a particular topic. In addition to themed papers, the journal regularly publishes on the following topics in IS management. Achieving Strategic IT Alignment and Capabilities IT Governance CIO and IT Leadership Roles IT Sourcing Planning and Managing an Enterprise Infrastructure IT Security Selecting and Delivering Application Solutions Portfolio Management Managing Complex IT Projects E-Business Technologies Supporting Knowledge Work The target readership includes both academics and practitioners. Hence, submissions integrating research and practice, and providing implications for both, are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Effect of Environment- and Organization-Specific Factors on Sustained Crowdsourcing Contest Participation How Ratings Shape the Supply on Sharing Economy Platforms: A Longitudinal Cohort Study on Listing Survival on Airbnb Continuance in Portuguese Peer-To-Peer Accommodation Services Through the Lens of Process Virtualization Theory A Cross-Country Study on Digital Payment Considering Cultural Dimensions Explaining Social Media Use Reduction As an Adaptive Coping Mechanism: The Roles of Privacy Literacy, Social Media Addiction and Exhaustion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1