欧盟资助研究在欧盟预防冲突和建设和平中的政治利用

N. Pavlov
{"title":"欧盟资助研究在欧盟预防冲突和建设和平中的政治利用","authors":"N. Pavlov","doi":"10.54648/eerr2022027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the political utilization of EU-funded research in support of EU conflict prevention and peacebuilding. By an institutional and empirical analysis, it seeks to assess the extent to which EU-funded research in this ‘high politics’ area is utilized in EU policy-making. The institutional analysis shows a highly complex and path-dependent EU institutional structure for research policymaking, marked by spill-over dynamics and supranational entrepreneurship. The empirical analysis is focussed on Horizon 2020 research projects as the main EU research policy outcomes. The direct political utilization of project results at the EU level is limited and fits the concept of ‘knowledge creep’. EU-funded research projects have contributed indirectly to the development of concepts which are in use in EU policy-making, such as civilian capabilities and gender mainstreaming. Project research outcomes have also been used internally in the scientific domain in terms of accumulation of scientific capital. The empirical results show a very limited level of EU research integration in this cross-sectoral area with clear horizontal differentiation between Western and Eastern Europe.\nEuropean Union (EU), research utilization, knowledge creep, conflict prevention, peacebuilding, Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP)","PeriodicalId":84710,"journal":{"name":"European foreign affairs review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Utilization of EU-Funded Research in EU Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding\",\"authors\":\"N. Pavlov\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eerr2022027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyses the political utilization of EU-funded research in support of EU conflict prevention and peacebuilding. By an institutional and empirical analysis, it seeks to assess the extent to which EU-funded research in this ‘high politics’ area is utilized in EU policy-making. The institutional analysis shows a highly complex and path-dependent EU institutional structure for research policymaking, marked by spill-over dynamics and supranational entrepreneurship. The empirical analysis is focussed on Horizon 2020 research projects as the main EU research policy outcomes. The direct political utilization of project results at the EU level is limited and fits the concept of ‘knowledge creep’. EU-funded research projects have contributed indirectly to the development of concepts which are in use in EU policy-making, such as civilian capabilities and gender mainstreaming. Project research outcomes have also been used internally in the scientific domain in terms of accumulation of scientific capital. The empirical results show a very limited level of EU research integration in this cross-sectoral area with clear horizontal differentiation between Western and Eastern Europe.\\nEuropean Union (EU), research utilization, knowledge creep, conflict prevention, peacebuilding, Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP)\",\"PeriodicalId\":84710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European foreign affairs review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European foreign affairs review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2022027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European foreign affairs review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2022027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了欧盟资助的研究在支持欧盟预防冲突和建设和平方面的政治利用。通过制度和实证分析,它试图评估欧盟资助的研究在这一“高政治”领域在欧盟决策中被利用的程度。制度分析显示,欧盟研究政策制定的制度结构高度复杂且路径依赖,其特点是溢出动力和超国家企业家精神。实证分析的重点是作为欧盟主要研究政策成果的“地平线2020”研究项目。欧盟层面对项目成果的直接政治利用是有限的,符合“知识蔓延”的概念。欧盟资助的研究项目间接促进了在欧盟决策中使用的概念的发展,如民用能力和性别主流化。项目研究成果也在科学领域内部被用于积累科学资本。实证结果表明,欧盟在这一跨部门领域的研究整合水平非常有限,西欧和东欧之间存在明显的横向分化。欧洲联盟(EU)、研究利用、知识蔓延、预防冲突、建设和平、共同安全和防务政策(CSDP)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Political Utilization of EU-Funded Research in EU Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding
The article analyses the political utilization of EU-funded research in support of EU conflict prevention and peacebuilding. By an institutional and empirical analysis, it seeks to assess the extent to which EU-funded research in this ‘high politics’ area is utilized in EU policy-making. The institutional analysis shows a highly complex and path-dependent EU institutional structure for research policymaking, marked by spill-over dynamics and supranational entrepreneurship. The empirical analysis is focussed on Horizon 2020 research projects as the main EU research policy outcomes. The direct political utilization of project results at the EU level is limited and fits the concept of ‘knowledge creep’. EU-funded research projects have contributed indirectly to the development of concepts which are in use in EU policy-making, such as civilian capabilities and gender mainstreaming. Project research outcomes have also been used internally in the scientific domain in terms of accumulation of scientific capital. The empirical results show a very limited level of EU research integration in this cross-sectoral area with clear horizontal differentiation between Western and Eastern Europe. European Union (EU), research utilization, knowledge creep, conflict prevention, peacebuilding, Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Fast and Furious? A Quick Digest of a Plan for the Accelerated Integration of Candidate Countries into the EU The EU’s Vaccine Diplomacy in the WHO The Compatibility of the ISDS Mechanism under the Energy Charter Treaty With the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order European Defence Union ASAP: The Act in Support of Ammunition Production and the development of EU defence capabilities in response to the war in Ukraine Who is really affected by European Union terrorist sanctions? A Critical Study on ‘Proximity’ in EU Case Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1