有机工业废物的资源高效处理:利用reMIND优化不同处理方案

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107065
Emma Lindkvist
{"title":"有机工业废物的资源高效处理:利用reMIND优化不同处理方案","authors":"Emma Lindkvist","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this work was to find the optimal resource-efficient treatment alternative for organic waste from the food industry. For that, four different treatment methods for thirteen feedstocks were studied: animal fodder production, incineration, biological treatment and biogas production. An optimization model was used to find which treatment alternative is the optimal from a variety of perspectives.</p><p>The studied systems were evaluated from three different evaluation perspectives: economy, energy and environment. The energy evaluation included two different electricity systems: coal condensing power and wind energy.</p><p>The results show that there is no single optimum feedstock treatment method taking all the perspectives studied into account. Instead, it is important to consider all different perspectives when evaluating the resource efficiency of the treatment method for a feedstock. However, both incineration and anaerobic digestion of the food waste can be considered as resource-efficient treatment options for the studied feedstocks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107065"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resource-efficient treatment of organic industrial waste: Optimization of different treatment options using reMIND\",\"authors\":\"Emma Lindkvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this work was to find the optimal resource-efficient treatment alternative for organic waste from the food industry. For that, four different treatment methods for thirteen feedstocks were studied: animal fodder production, incineration, biological treatment and biogas production. An optimization model was used to find which treatment alternative is the optimal from a variety of perspectives.</p><p>The studied systems were evaluated from three different evaluation perspectives: economy, energy and environment. The energy evaluation included two different electricity systems: coal condensing power and wind energy.</p><p>The results show that there is no single optimum feedstock treatment method taking all the perspectives studied into account. Instead, it is important to consider all different perspectives when evaluating the resource efficiency of the treatment method for a feedstock. However, both incineration and anaerobic digestion of the food waste can be considered as resource-efficient treatment options for the studied feedstocks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492300201X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492300201X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的目的是为食品工业的有机废物找到最佳的资源高效处理替代方案。为此,研究了13种饲料的四种不同处理方法:动物饲料生产、焚烧、生物处理和沼气生产。优化模型用于从各种角度寻找哪种治疗方案是最佳的。从经济、能源和环境三个不同的评价角度对所研究的系统进行了评价。能源评估包括两种不同的电力系统:煤炭冷凝电力和风能。结果表明,考虑到所有研究视角,不存在单一的最佳原料处理方法。相反,在评估原料处理方法的资源效率时,重要的是要考虑所有不同的角度。然而,食物垃圾的焚烧和厌氧消化都可以被视为所研究原料的资源高效处理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resource-efficient treatment of organic industrial waste: Optimization of different treatment options using reMIND

The aim of this work was to find the optimal resource-efficient treatment alternative for organic waste from the food industry. For that, four different treatment methods for thirteen feedstocks were studied: animal fodder production, incineration, biological treatment and biogas production. An optimization model was used to find which treatment alternative is the optimal from a variety of perspectives.

The studied systems were evaluated from three different evaluation perspectives: economy, energy and environment. The energy evaluation included two different electricity systems: coal condensing power and wind energy.

The results show that there is no single optimum feedstock treatment method taking all the perspectives studied into account. Instead, it is important to consider all different perspectives when evaluating the resource efficiency of the treatment method for a feedstock. However, both incineration and anaerobic digestion of the food waste can be considered as resource-efficient treatment options for the studied feedstocks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Development of sustainable high-performance desert sand concrete: Engineering and environmental impacts of compression casting Stability of China's terrestrial ecosystems carbon sink during 2000-2020 Self-sufficiency of the European Union in critical raw materials for E-mobility Assessing the environmental and economic impacts of intracity express delivery: Pathways for carbon reduction and cost efficiency in China Selective anchoring of phosphate groups coupled with swift interlayer cation exchange for record-high capacity cobalt adsorption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1