道路基础设施管理——地方道路管理部门的视角

IF 0.4 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.20858/sjsutst.2023.120.17
Marcin Świtała
{"title":"道路基础设施管理——地方道路管理部门的视角","authors":"Marcin Świtała","doi":"10.20858/sjsutst.2023.120.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of research conducted among 100 local government units performing the duties of road network administrators, i.e., administrators of municipal roads (AMR), county roads (ACR) and those operating within the boundaries of cities with county rights (ACCR). The aim of the research was to identify and assess management problems related to the implementation of statutory measures related to the protection and development of respective road networks. A hypothesis was formulated about the existence of statistically significant differences between the AMR, ACR and ACCR groups, which was verified by quantitative analysis of the data obtained from the online survey. They were analysed and interpreted using the SPSS package and using measures of descriptive statistics, the correlation coefficient and the Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks. The results of the study indicate that the difficulties of providing and maintaining an efficient road network pavement, as well as the challenges of developing draft financing plans for the construction, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of the road network, are currently the main points of focus for all road administrators. The lack of statistical significance of intergroup differences was observed in the vast majority of measurements. The exceptions to this were the differences that occurred in the total number of difficulties reported, which were greater among the members of AMR and ACR than ACCR, as well as the differences related to the implementation of measures undertaken for the maintenance of roadside greenery, which were more onerous for ACR.","PeriodicalId":43740,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT - THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE LOCAL ROADS AUTHORITY\",\"authors\":\"Marcin Świtała\",\"doi\":\"10.20858/sjsutst.2023.120.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the results of research conducted among 100 local government units performing the duties of road network administrators, i.e., administrators of municipal roads (AMR), county roads (ACR) and those operating within the boundaries of cities with county rights (ACCR). The aim of the research was to identify and assess management problems related to the implementation of statutory measures related to the protection and development of respective road networks. A hypothesis was formulated about the existence of statistically significant differences between the AMR, ACR and ACCR groups, which was verified by quantitative analysis of the data obtained from the online survey. They were analysed and interpreted using the SPSS package and using measures of descriptive statistics, the correlation coefficient and the Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks. The results of the study indicate that the difficulties of providing and maintaining an efficient road network pavement, as well as the challenges of developing draft financing plans for the construction, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of the road network, are currently the main points of focus for all road administrators. The lack of statistical significance of intergroup differences was observed in the vast majority of measurements. The exceptions to this were the differences that occurred in the total number of difficulties reported, which were greater among the members of AMR and ACR than ACCR, as well as the differences related to the implementation of measures undertaken for the maintenance of roadside greenery, which were more onerous for ACR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2023.120.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2023.120.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了在100个履行道路网络管理者职责的地方政府单位中进行的研究结果,即市政道路管理者(AMR)、县道管理者(ACR)和在拥有县权的城市边界内运营的地方政府管理者(ACCR)。研究的目的是确定和评估与实施与保护和发展各自道路网有关的法定措施有关的管理问题。提出了AMR、ACR和ACCR组之间存在统计学显著差异的假设,并通过对在线调查数据的定量分析进行了验证。使用SPSS软件包、描述性统计、相关系数和Kruskal–Wallis秩检验对其进行分析和解释。研究结果表明,提供和维护高效路网路面的困难,以及制定路网建设、重建和恢复融资计划草案的挑战,是目前所有道路管理人员关注的主要问题。在绝大多数测量中,观察到组间差异缺乏统计学意义。例外情况是报告的困难总数的差异,AMR和ACR成员之间的差异大于ACCR,以及与实施路边绿化维护措施有关的差异,这对ACR来说更为繁重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT - THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE LOCAL ROADS AUTHORITY
This paper presents the results of research conducted among 100 local government units performing the duties of road network administrators, i.e., administrators of municipal roads (AMR), county roads (ACR) and those operating within the boundaries of cities with county rights (ACCR). The aim of the research was to identify and assess management problems related to the implementation of statutory measures related to the protection and development of respective road networks. A hypothesis was formulated about the existence of statistically significant differences between the AMR, ACR and ACCR groups, which was verified by quantitative analysis of the data obtained from the online survey. They were analysed and interpreted using the SPSS package and using measures of descriptive statistics, the correlation coefficient and the Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks. The results of the study indicate that the difficulties of providing and maintaining an efficient road network pavement, as well as the challenges of developing draft financing plans for the construction, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of the road network, are currently the main points of focus for all road administrators. The lack of statistical significance of intergroup differences was observed in the vast majority of measurements. The exceptions to this were the differences that occurred in the total number of difficulties reported, which were greater among the members of AMR and ACR than ACCR, as well as the differences related to the implementation of measures undertaken for the maintenance of roadside greenery, which were more onerous for ACR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
PERSPECTIVES OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL INTEGRATED SUBURBAN-URBAN RAIL TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT ITS-PRO-FLOW: A NEW ENHANCED SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION FOR INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS OPTIMAL DOCKING PROBLEM OF UAV AT DETECTED MOVING OBJECT FACTORS RELATED TO MOTORCYCLING PERFORMANCE OF THE ELDERLY: A CASE STUDY OF KHI LEK SUBDISTRICT, UBON RATCHATHANI PROVINCE, THAILAND EVALUATION OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESS OF WAGON PROCESSING AT SHUNTING STATIONS USING THE SIMULATION MODEL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1