野狗对土耳其南部自然保护区野生动物的影响

IF 0.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY Polish Journal of Ecology Pub Date : 2022-10-24 DOI:10.3161/15052249PJE2020.70.1.004
I. Oğurlu, Y. Ünal, Mehmet Şirin Yelsiz, B. Pekin
{"title":"野狗对土耳其南部自然保护区野生动物的影响","authors":"I. Oğurlu, Y. Ünal, Mehmet Şirin Yelsiz, B. Pekin","doi":"10.3161/15052249PJE2020.70.1.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Feral dogs can negatively impact wildlife through predation, fear interceded behavioural changes, harassment, hybridisation, and disease transmission. Thus, the presence of feral dogs in nature reserves poses a major problem for wildlife conservation. In this study, we recorded the effects of free-roaming dogs (Canis familiaris) on wildlife species in a protected Mediterranean forest reserve in southern Turkey. By using camera traps and line transects we sought to understand how the presence of feral dogs impacted the main wildlife species in the study area. Applying presence-absence transect surveys and camera trapping techniques to estimate animal occurrence we covered approximately 97,00 ha and recorded 4209 images over a 154-week period. We found that the presence of feral dogs was significantly correlated with the movement of frequently observed wildlife species. Based on transect surveys, the species significantly affected by dog presence were fallow deer (Dama dama), wild boar (Sus scrofa), beech marten (Martes foina), badger (Meles meles), and red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Based on the camera trap data, fallow deer were negatively affected and wild boar not affected by dog occurrence while wild goat (Capra aegagrus) and caracal (Caracal caracal) were positively affected. The occurrence of wild boars, wild goats, hares, beech martens, red foxes and caracals across our study area increased with distance from agricultural land, while the occurrence of deer decreased. Overall, our findings suggest that the presence of dogs has a strong influence on wildlife in our study reserve. Since protected areas often are a final refuge for many of the species observed in this study, there is a need to take urgent measures to prevent feral dog impacts on wildlife and to reduce feral dog populations in wildlife reserves.","PeriodicalId":49683,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Feral Dogs on Wildlife in a Nature Reserve in Southern Turkey\",\"authors\":\"I. Oğurlu, Y. Ünal, Mehmet Şirin Yelsiz, B. Pekin\",\"doi\":\"10.3161/15052249PJE2020.70.1.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Feral dogs can negatively impact wildlife through predation, fear interceded behavioural changes, harassment, hybridisation, and disease transmission. Thus, the presence of feral dogs in nature reserves poses a major problem for wildlife conservation. In this study, we recorded the effects of free-roaming dogs (Canis familiaris) on wildlife species in a protected Mediterranean forest reserve in southern Turkey. By using camera traps and line transects we sought to understand how the presence of feral dogs impacted the main wildlife species in the study area. Applying presence-absence transect surveys and camera trapping techniques to estimate animal occurrence we covered approximately 97,00 ha and recorded 4209 images over a 154-week period. We found that the presence of feral dogs was significantly correlated with the movement of frequently observed wildlife species. Based on transect surveys, the species significantly affected by dog presence were fallow deer (Dama dama), wild boar (Sus scrofa), beech marten (Martes foina), badger (Meles meles), and red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Based on the camera trap data, fallow deer were negatively affected and wild boar not affected by dog occurrence while wild goat (Capra aegagrus) and caracal (Caracal caracal) were positively affected. The occurrence of wild boars, wild goats, hares, beech martens, red foxes and caracals across our study area increased with distance from agricultural land, while the occurrence of deer decreased. Overall, our findings suggest that the presence of dogs has a strong influence on wildlife in our study reserve. Since protected areas often are a final refuge for many of the species observed in this study, there is a need to take urgent measures to prevent feral dog impacts on wildlife and to reduce feral dog populations in wildlife reserves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3161/15052249PJE2020.70.1.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3161/15052249PJE2020.70.1.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:野狗会通过捕食、恐惧引起的行为变化、骚扰、杂交和疾病传播对野生动物产生负面影响。因此,野生狗在自然保护区的存在给野生动物保护带来了一个重大问题。在这项研究中,我们记录了自由漫游犬(Canis familyaris)对土耳其南部地中海森林保护区野生动物物种的影响。通过使用相机捕捉器和样线,我们试图了解野狗的存在如何影响研究区域的主要野生动物物种。应用存在-不存在样带调查和相机捕捉技术来估计动物的发生,我们在154周的时间里覆盖了大约97,00公顷,记录了4209张图像。我们发现,野狗的存在与经常观察到的野生动物物种的运动显著相关。根据样带调查,受狗存在显著影响的物种是休耕鹿(Dama Dama)、野猪(Sus scrofa)、山毛榉貂(Martes foina)、獾(Meles Meles)和赤狐(Vulpes Vulpes)。根据相机捕捉数据,休耕鹿受到负面影响,野猪不受狗的影响,而野山羊(Capra aegagrus)和卡拉卡尔(卡拉卡尔卡拉卡尔)受到正面影响。在我们的研究区域,野猪、野山羊、野兔、山毛榉貂、赤狐和商陆的发生率随着距离农田的距离而增加,而鹿的发生率则减少。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,狗的存在对我们研究保护区的野生动物有很大的影响。由于保护区通常是本研究中观察到的许多物种的最后避难所,因此有必要采取紧急措施防止野狗对野生动物的影响,并减少野生动物保护区内的野狗数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effects of Feral Dogs on Wildlife in a Nature Reserve in Southern Turkey
ABSTRACT Feral dogs can negatively impact wildlife through predation, fear interceded behavioural changes, harassment, hybridisation, and disease transmission. Thus, the presence of feral dogs in nature reserves poses a major problem for wildlife conservation. In this study, we recorded the effects of free-roaming dogs (Canis familiaris) on wildlife species in a protected Mediterranean forest reserve in southern Turkey. By using camera traps and line transects we sought to understand how the presence of feral dogs impacted the main wildlife species in the study area. Applying presence-absence transect surveys and camera trapping techniques to estimate animal occurrence we covered approximately 97,00 ha and recorded 4209 images over a 154-week period. We found that the presence of feral dogs was significantly correlated with the movement of frequently observed wildlife species. Based on transect surveys, the species significantly affected by dog presence were fallow deer (Dama dama), wild boar (Sus scrofa), beech marten (Martes foina), badger (Meles meles), and red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Based on the camera trap data, fallow deer were negatively affected and wild boar not affected by dog occurrence while wild goat (Capra aegagrus) and caracal (Caracal caracal) were positively affected. The occurrence of wild boars, wild goats, hares, beech martens, red foxes and caracals across our study area increased with distance from agricultural land, while the occurrence of deer decreased. Overall, our findings suggest that the presence of dogs has a strong influence on wildlife in our study reserve. Since protected areas often are a final refuge for many of the species observed in this study, there is a need to take urgent measures to prevent feral dog impacts on wildlife and to reduce feral dog populations in wildlife reserves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Ecology
Polish Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: POLISH JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY (formerly Ekologia polska) publishes original scientific research papers dealing with all aspects of ecology: both fundamental and applied, physiological ecology, evolutionary ecology, ecology of population, community, ecosystem, landscape as well as global ecology. There is no bias regarding taxons, ecosystems or geographical regions.
期刊最新文献
Anthropogenic Influence in a Eutrophic Marine Ecosystem Affects Condition of the Eastern Mud Snail Ilyanassa obsoleta and Its Prevalence of Parasitic Trematode Pleurogonius malaclemys Allelopathy of Native Pinus massoniana Lamb. on Invasive Species: Stronger Effect on Amaranthus retroflexus L. than on Celosia argentea L. Temporal Variability in Nest Numbers of Rook (Corvus frugilegus) Colonies: Influence of Nearby Rookeries and Insights for Species Censuses Reef-Dweling Christmas Tree Worms (Spirobranchus, Serpulidae, Polychaeta), on Porites Corals: Densities and Age Structure A Long-Term Study of Carex vesicaria and Phalaris arundinacea Population Dynamics in Permanent Plots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1