肉类质量、生物安全和动物福利:低效检验的后果

P. Tatemoto, Vanessa Louise Santos Oliveira, David Attuy Vey da Silva, Marco Túlio Costa Almeida
{"title":"肉类质量、生物安全和动物福利:低效检验的后果","authors":"P. Tatemoto, Vanessa Louise Santos Oliveira, David Attuy Vey da Silva, Marco Túlio Costa Almeida","doi":"10.18502/jfsh.v6i4.7568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In livestock, biosecurity, animal welfare and meat quality have a synergetic effect on the final product. To meet minimal safety and humane production, it is necessary to consider biosecurity risks and procedures to mitigate animal welfare problems. Following guidelines to achieve it, the meat quality improves consequently. Here we tested two parameters regarding the meat quality of beef cattle to understand how the poor inspection affects the quality of the final product. Therefore, 12 samples of the longissimus dorsi muscle were evaluated from different butcheries, using fresh meat recently received by the supplier. There were no sanitary inspection records related to the sampled meat. The results showed a large percentage of PSE (pale, soft, and exudative) and DFD (dark, firm, and dry) meats. Given the pH and color values, it is concluded that the slaughtering was not carried out properly. Hence, technological defects in the meat were observed, making it inappropriate for consumption. We concluded that inefficient pre-slaughter handling is compromising animal welfare, increasing the biosecurity risk, and impairing the quality of the final product. We argue that these problems not only decrease the sustainability of livestock systems, but also compromises human health. Currently, livestock plays an important role in global environmental concerns, such as climate change, land degradation, water pollution and biodiversity loss. Then, it is needed to reduce the waste of such products.","PeriodicalId":91000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food safety and hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meat quality, biosecurity, and animal welfare: consequences of an inefficient inspection\",\"authors\":\"P. Tatemoto, Vanessa Louise Santos Oliveira, David Attuy Vey da Silva, Marco Túlio Costa Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jfsh.v6i4.7568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In livestock, biosecurity, animal welfare and meat quality have a synergetic effect on the final product. To meet minimal safety and humane production, it is necessary to consider biosecurity risks and procedures to mitigate animal welfare problems. Following guidelines to achieve it, the meat quality improves consequently. Here we tested two parameters regarding the meat quality of beef cattle to understand how the poor inspection affects the quality of the final product. Therefore, 12 samples of the longissimus dorsi muscle were evaluated from different butcheries, using fresh meat recently received by the supplier. There were no sanitary inspection records related to the sampled meat. The results showed a large percentage of PSE (pale, soft, and exudative) and DFD (dark, firm, and dry) meats. Given the pH and color values, it is concluded that the slaughtering was not carried out properly. Hence, technological defects in the meat were observed, making it inappropriate for consumption. We concluded that inefficient pre-slaughter handling is compromising animal welfare, increasing the biosecurity risk, and impairing the quality of the final product. We argue that these problems not only decrease the sustainability of livestock systems, but also compromises human health. Currently, livestock plays an important role in global environmental concerns, such as climate change, land degradation, water pollution and biodiversity loss. Then, it is needed to reduce the waste of such products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food safety and hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food safety and hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh.v6i4.7568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food safety and hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh.v6i4.7568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在畜牧业,生物安全、动物福利和肉类质量对最终产品有协同作用。为了实现最低限度的安全和人道生产,有必要考虑生物安全风险和程序,以缓解动物福利问题。按照指导方针来实现这一点,肉的质量也随之提高。在这里,我们测试了关于肉牛肉质的两个参数,以了解不良检查如何影响最终产品的质量。因此,使用供应商最近收到的新鲜肉类,对来自不同肉店的12个背最长肌样本进行了评估。没有与抽样肉类有关的卫生检查记录。结果显示,PSE(苍白、柔软、渗出)和DFD(深色、坚硬、干燥)肉的比例很大。考虑到pH值和颜色值,得出的结论是屠宰没有正确进行。因此,观察到肉的技术缺陷,使其不适合食用。我们得出的结论是,低效的屠宰前处理正在损害动物福利,增加生物安全风险,并损害最终产品的质量。我们认为,这些问题不仅降低了畜牧系统的可持续性,而且损害了人类健康。目前,牲畜在气候变化、土地退化、水污染和生物多样性丧失等全球环境问题中发挥着重要作用。然后,需要减少此类产品的浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meat quality, biosecurity, and animal welfare: consequences of an inefficient inspection
In livestock, biosecurity, animal welfare and meat quality have a synergetic effect on the final product. To meet minimal safety and humane production, it is necessary to consider biosecurity risks and procedures to mitigate animal welfare problems. Following guidelines to achieve it, the meat quality improves consequently. Here we tested two parameters regarding the meat quality of beef cattle to understand how the poor inspection affects the quality of the final product. Therefore, 12 samples of the longissimus dorsi muscle were evaluated from different butcheries, using fresh meat recently received by the supplier. There were no sanitary inspection records related to the sampled meat. The results showed a large percentage of PSE (pale, soft, and exudative) and DFD (dark, firm, and dry) meats. Given the pH and color values, it is concluded that the slaughtering was not carried out properly. Hence, technological defects in the meat were observed, making it inappropriate for consumption. We concluded that inefficient pre-slaughter handling is compromising animal welfare, increasing the biosecurity risk, and impairing the quality of the final product. We argue that these problems not only decrease the sustainability of livestock systems, but also compromises human health. Currently, livestock plays an important role in global environmental concerns, such as climate change, land degradation, water pollution and biodiversity loss. Then, it is needed to reduce the waste of such products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the antioxidant activity and the level of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in honey Assessment of aflatoxin levels in whole and peeled ginger marketed in Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania Bacteriological quality of street-vended beverages sold in two popular markets in Georgetown, Guyana Assessment of meat preservation methods used by retailers and the estimation of direct economic losses associated with meat spoilage in Kenya Nitrosamine in meat and meat products: a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1