新西兰人工林平均顶高定义和抽样方法对估算误差的影响

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science Pub Date : 2019-02-19 DOI:10.33494/NZJFS492019X24X
E. Mason
{"title":"新西兰人工林平均顶高定义和抽样方法对估算误差的影响","authors":"E. Mason","doi":"10.33494/NZJFS492019X24X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A study was undertaken of 51 stand inventories to compare two alternative mean top height (MTH) calculation methods prevalent in New Zealand, and to evaluate the consequences of creating height versus diameter at breast height (H-D) curves at a stand-level during inventories as opposed to fitting H-D curves at a plot-level. \nMethods: The dataset was separated into two groups; one with plots having less than 6 heights measured and one with more than 5 heights measured. MTH was calculated using all possible combinations of the two calculation methods and with H-D curves either at a stand-level or a plot-level. Graphs were prepared to compare the 4 alternative MTH estimation techniques for all plots. In addition standard deviations of MTH between plots were calculated within stands, and then these were compared for different MTH calculation methods using interleaved histograms and with a mixed effects analysis of variance. \nResults: Results showed that the two MTH calculation methods were almost identical so long as H-D curves were fitted at a plot-level, but they differed substantially when curves were fitted at a stand-level. In addition, fitting H-D curves at a stand-level reduced independence of samples, resulting in substantial decreases in estimated standard deviations in MTH within samples, thereby artificially reducing confidence intervals around sample estimates. \nConclusions: Inventory estimates of MTH were found to depend on calculation method, and so a standard definition is required. In addition, H-D curves fitted at a stand level undermined the assumption that sampling units were independent, and thereby reduced estimated variation between plots by up to 69%, depending on MTH calculation method. Forest inventory procedures in New Zealand’s forest plantations should be redesigned to enable accurate definition of confidence intervals around sample estimates, and to facilitate the use of inventories for estimating variation in productivity across landscapes.","PeriodicalId":19172,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influences of mean top height definition and sampling method on errors of estimates in New Zealand’s forest plantations\",\"authors\":\"E. Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.33494/NZJFS492019X24X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A study was undertaken of 51 stand inventories to compare two alternative mean top height (MTH) calculation methods prevalent in New Zealand, and to evaluate the consequences of creating height versus diameter at breast height (H-D) curves at a stand-level during inventories as opposed to fitting H-D curves at a plot-level. \\nMethods: The dataset was separated into two groups; one with plots having less than 6 heights measured and one with more than 5 heights measured. MTH was calculated using all possible combinations of the two calculation methods and with H-D curves either at a stand-level or a plot-level. Graphs were prepared to compare the 4 alternative MTH estimation techniques for all plots. In addition standard deviations of MTH between plots were calculated within stands, and then these were compared for different MTH calculation methods using interleaved histograms and with a mixed effects analysis of variance. \\nResults: Results showed that the two MTH calculation methods were almost identical so long as H-D curves were fitted at a plot-level, but they differed substantially when curves were fitted at a stand-level. In addition, fitting H-D curves at a stand-level reduced independence of samples, resulting in substantial decreases in estimated standard deviations in MTH within samples, thereby artificially reducing confidence intervals around sample estimates. \\nConclusions: Inventory estimates of MTH were found to depend on calculation method, and so a standard definition is required. In addition, H-D curves fitted at a stand level undermined the assumption that sampling units were independent, and thereby reduced estimated variation between plots by up to 69%, depending on MTH calculation method. Forest inventory procedures in New Zealand’s forest plantations should be redesigned to enable accurate definition of confidence intervals around sample estimates, and to facilitate the use of inventories for estimating variation in productivity across landscapes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33494/NZJFS492019X24X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33494/NZJFS492019X24X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:对51个林分盘点进行了一项研究,以比较新西兰流行的两种替代平均顶部高度(MTH)计算方法,并评估在盘点期间在林分水平上创建高度与乳高直径(H-D)曲线而不是在地块水平上拟合H-D曲线的后果。方法:将数据集分为两组;一个具有测量到的小于6个高度的曲线图,另一个具有测得的大于5个高度的图。MTH使用两种计算方法的所有可能组合进行计算,并在林分水平或地块水平上使用H-D曲线。绘制图表以比较所有地块的4种备选MTH估计技术。此外,还计算了林分内地块间MTH的标准差,然后使用交错直方图和混合效应方差分析对不同MTH计算方法进行比较。结果:结果表明,只要H-D曲线在地块水平上拟合,两种MTH计算方法几乎相同,但当曲线在林分水平上拟合时,它们有很大的差异。此外,在林分水平上拟合H-D曲线降低了样本的独立性,导致样本内MTH的估计标准偏差显著降低,从而人为地降低了样本估计的置信区间。结论:MTH的库存估计取决于计算方法,因此需要一个标准的定义。此外,在林分水平拟合的H-D曲线破坏了采样单位独立的假设,从而根据MTH计算方法,将地块之间的估计变化减少了69%。应重新设计新西兰人工林的森林清查程序,以便能够准确定义样本估计的置信区间,并便于使用清查来估计不同景观的生产力变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influences of mean top height definition and sampling method on errors of estimates in New Zealand’s forest plantations
Background: A study was undertaken of 51 stand inventories to compare two alternative mean top height (MTH) calculation methods prevalent in New Zealand, and to evaluate the consequences of creating height versus diameter at breast height (H-D) curves at a stand-level during inventories as opposed to fitting H-D curves at a plot-level. Methods: The dataset was separated into two groups; one with plots having less than 6 heights measured and one with more than 5 heights measured. MTH was calculated using all possible combinations of the two calculation methods and with H-D curves either at a stand-level or a plot-level. Graphs were prepared to compare the 4 alternative MTH estimation techniques for all plots. In addition standard deviations of MTH between plots were calculated within stands, and then these were compared for different MTH calculation methods using interleaved histograms and with a mixed effects analysis of variance. Results: Results showed that the two MTH calculation methods were almost identical so long as H-D curves were fitted at a plot-level, but they differed substantially when curves were fitted at a stand-level. In addition, fitting H-D curves at a stand-level reduced independence of samples, resulting in substantial decreases in estimated standard deviations in MTH within samples, thereby artificially reducing confidence intervals around sample estimates. Conclusions: Inventory estimates of MTH were found to depend on calculation method, and so a standard definition is required. In addition, H-D curves fitted at a stand level undermined the assumption that sampling units were independent, and thereby reduced estimated variation between plots by up to 69%, depending on MTH calculation method. Forest inventory procedures in New Zealand’s forest plantations should be redesigned to enable accurate definition of confidence intervals around sample estimates, and to facilitate the use of inventories for estimating variation in productivity across landscapes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
20
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science is an international journal covering the breadth of forestry science. Planted forests are a particular focus but manuscripts on a wide range of forestry topics will also be considered. The journal''s scope covers forestry species, which are those capable of reaching at least five metres in height at maturity in the place they are located, but not grown or managed primarily for fruit or nut production.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of tending on attributes of radiata pine trees and stands in New Zealand – a review Above-ground biomass accumulation in Cerradão managed by the mass ratio Quantitative genetic parameters of heartwood and its chemical traits in a black pine (Pinus nigra J.F.Arnold) clonal seed orchard established in Greece Tree root research in New Zealand: a retrospective ‘review’ with emphasis on soil reinforcement for soil conservation and wind firmness Effect of changes in forest water balance and inferred root reinforcement on landslide occurrence and sediment generation following Pinus radiata harvest on Tertiary terrain, eastern North Island, New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1