标签中的评论:检查AO3上的书签文化

Q3 Arts and Humanities Proceedings from the Document Academy Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.35492/docam/9/1/7
Mikael Gyhagen
{"title":"标签中的评论:检查AO3上的书签文化","authors":"Mikael Gyhagen","doi":"10.35492/docam/9/1/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the bookmarking tags present on Archive of Our Own (AO3) through a study into the practices from their public annotation. The probe examines the presence of cultures of practice, and usable research data available on the platform. Examined fics had minimums of 25.000 words and seven chapters, published over at least four months. In addition, the number of individual bookmarks was limited to works with 300 or more, selected from disparate fandoms. The number of relevant bookmarks averaged at 11% of the total, a significant representation in the data, pointing to general trends within the archive. The probe revealed several layers of communication, in the forms of interactive tags, pure text commentary, and connections to larger collections. Each of the individual bookmarks, based on content, are classed as “Annotation”, “Curation” and “Communication” for purposes of analysis. These categories also pointed to practices in annotations of targeting specific, individual, audiences. It shows several different trends in users’ application of the bookmark function. These trends of practice go beyond individual fandoms, pointing to cultures pervasive on AO3 as a platform. The probe also presents the difficulties this bring to the study of bookmark data.","PeriodicalId":36214,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings from the Document Academy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments in Tags: Examining Bookmarking Cultures on AO3\",\"authors\":\"Mikael Gyhagen\",\"doi\":\"10.35492/docam/9/1/7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the bookmarking tags present on Archive of Our Own (AO3) through a study into the practices from their public annotation. The probe examines the presence of cultures of practice, and usable research data available on the platform. Examined fics had minimums of 25.000 words and seven chapters, published over at least four months. In addition, the number of individual bookmarks was limited to works with 300 or more, selected from disparate fandoms. The number of relevant bookmarks averaged at 11% of the total, a significant representation in the data, pointing to general trends within the archive. The probe revealed several layers of communication, in the forms of interactive tags, pure text commentary, and connections to larger collections. Each of the individual bookmarks, based on content, are classed as “Annotation”, “Curation” and “Communication” for purposes of analysis. These categories also pointed to practices in annotations of targeting specific, individual, audiences. It shows several different trends in users’ application of the bookmark function. These trends of practice go beyond individual fandoms, pointing to cultures pervasive on AO3 as a platform. The probe also presents the difficulties this bring to the study of bookmark data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings from the Document Academy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings from the Document Academy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/9/1/7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings from the Document Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/9/1/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对我们自己的档案(AO3)上的书签标记的公共注释实践的研究,对其进行了研究。该调查考察了实践文化的存在,以及平台上可用的可用研究数据。经审查的小说至少有25000字,七章,出版时间至少为四个月。此外,单个书签的数量仅限于从不同的粉丝中选择300个或更多的作品。相关书签的数量平均占总数的11%,这在数据中是一个重要的代表,表明了档案中的总体趋势。调查揭示了多个沟通层面,包括互动标签、纯文本评论以及与更大收藏的联系。基于内容,每个单独的书签都被归类为“注释”、“Curation”和“Communication”,以便于分析。这些类别还指出了针对特定、个人受众的注释中的做法。它展示了用户应用书签功能的几个不同趋势。这些实践趋势超越了个人粉丝,指向了AO3平台上普遍存在的文化。探讨了这给书签数据研究带来的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comments in Tags: Examining Bookmarking Cultures on AO3
This paper examines the bookmarking tags present on Archive of Our Own (AO3) through a study into the practices from their public annotation. The probe examines the presence of cultures of practice, and usable research data available on the platform. Examined fics had minimums of 25.000 words and seven chapters, published over at least four months. In addition, the number of individual bookmarks was limited to works with 300 or more, selected from disparate fandoms. The number of relevant bookmarks averaged at 11% of the total, a significant representation in the data, pointing to general trends within the archive. The probe revealed several layers of communication, in the forms of interactive tags, pure text commentary, and connections to larger collections. Each of the individual bookmarks, based on content, are classed as “Annotation”, “Curation” and “Communication” for purposes of analysis. These categories also pointed to practices in annotations of targeting specific, individual, audiences. It shows several different trends in users’ application of the bookmark function. These trends of practice go beyond individual fandoms, pointing to cultures pervasive on AO3 as a platform. The probe also presents the difficulties this bring to the study of bookmark data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings from the Document Academy
Proceedings from the Document Academy Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
This Sounds Like an Episode of The X-Files: Analyzing How Twitter Users Interpreted the COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Sci-Fi Television "i’m mixing comic book canon and mcu canon to suit my own needs": Information Sharing as Community Building in a Fandom in Flux Fandom, Fanzines, and Archiving Science Fiction Fannish History The Library Wants to Kill You: Places of Information as Battleground and Sanctum in Halo Halliday Journals and Holodecks: Audiences and Information in Sci-Fi Fandoms: Papers from the FanLIS 2023 Symposium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1