鸟眼糖枫(Acer Saccharum)和卷曲红枫(Acer Rubrum)的腐烂

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 FORESTRY Wood and Fiber Science Pub Date : 2020-07-27 DOI:10.22382/wfs-2020-027
T. Bal, K. E. Schneider, D. Richter
{"title":"鸟眼糖枫(Acer Saccharum)和卷曲红枫(Acer Rubrum)的腐烂","authors":"T. Bal, K. E. Schneider, D. Richter","doi":"10.22382/wfs-2020-027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two figured woods, commonly known as birdseye maple ( Acer saccharum , sugar maple) and curly maple ( Acer rubrum , red maple), were exposed to brown rot and white rot fungi in a standard laboratory decay test and compared with unfigured wood of each species, respectively. For the birdseye maple, two levels of figure intensity were used: wood with heavy figure and wood with light figure. Heavily figured birdseye maple wood was decayed significantly less by the brown rot fungus  Rhodonia placenta  than unfigured maple wood or lightly figured maple wood. However, heavily figured birdseye maple wood was decayed significantly more by two white rot fungi,  Trametes versicolor  and  Irpex lacteus , than unfigured maple wood but was not decayed significantly more than lightly figured wood. For both brown rot and white rot fungi, lightly figured birdseye maple wood did not decay significantly differently compared with unfigured wood. Likewise, there was no significant difference in decay between curly red maple wood and unfigured red maple wood for either brown rot or white rot fungi. Results suggest chemical or anatomical differences in the heavily figured birdseye sugar maple wood affect decay by brown rot and white rot fungi. These findings may be useful to hobbyists and woodworkers needing to protect wood or who partially decay wood to produce spalted wood for decorative purposes.","PeriodicalId":23620,"journal":{"name":"Wood and Fiber Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"292-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decay of birdseye sugar maple (Acer Saccharum) and curly red maple (Acer Rubrum)\",\"authors\":\"T. Bal, K. E. Schneider, D. Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.22382/wfs-2020-027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two figured woods, commonly known as birdseye maple ( Acer saccharum , sugar maple) and curly maple ( Acer rubrum , red maple), were exposed to brown rot and white rot fungi in a standard laboratory decay test and compared with unfigured wood of each species, respectively. For the birdseye maple, two levels of figure intensity were used: wood with heavy figure and wood with light figure. Heavily figured birdseye maple wood was decayed significantly less by the brown rot fungus  Rhodonia placenta  than unfigured maple wood or lightly figured maple wood. However, heavily figured birdseye maple wood was decayed significantly more by two white rot fungi,  Trametes versicolor  and  Irpex lacteus , than unfigured maple wood but was not decayed significantly more than lightly figured wood. For both brown rot and white rot fungi, lightly figured birdseye maple wood did not decay significantly differently compared with unfigured wood. Likewise, there was no significant difference in decay between curly red maple wood and unfigured red maple wood for either brown rot or white rot fungi. Results suggest chemical or anatomical differences in the heavily figured birdseye sugar maple wood affect decay by brown rot and white rot fungi. These findings may be useful to hobbyists and woodworkers needing to protect wood or who partially decay wood to produce spalted wood for decorative purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wood and Fiber Science\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"292-297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wood and Fiber Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2020-027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wood and Fiber Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2020-027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在标准的实验室腐烂试验中,将两种通常被称为鸟眼枫(Acer saccharum,糖枫)和卷曲枫(Acer rubrum,红枫)的木材分别暴露于褐腐菌和白腐菌中,并与未被发现的木材进行比较。对于鸟眼枫,使用了两个级别的图形强度:木材与重图形和木材与轻图形。褐腐菌胎盘Rhodonia对重花型鸟眼枫的腐蚀作用明显小于未花型枫和轻花型枫。而斑纹严重的鸟眼枫被两种白腐真菌(Trametes versicolor和Irpex lacteus)的腐烂程度显著高于未斑纹的鸟眼枫,但没有明显高于斑纹轻微的鸟眼枫。对于褐腐菌和白腐菌,浅纹鸟眼枫木与未纹鸟眼枫木相比,其腐烂程度无显著差异。同样,卷曲红枫和未卷曲红枫对褐腐菌和白腐菌的腐烂也没有显著差异。结果表明,重花型鸟眼糖枫的化学或解剖学差异影响褐腐菌和白腐菌的腐烂。这些发现可能对需要保护木材或部分腐烂木材以生产用于装饰目的的剥落木材的爱好者和木工有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decay of birdseye sugar maple (Acer Saccharum) and curly red maple (Acer Rubrum)
Two figured woods, commonly known as birdseye maple ( Acer saccharum , sugar maple) and curly maple ( Acer rubrum , red maple), were exposed to brown rot and white rot fungi in a standard laboratory decay test and compared with unfigured wood of each species, respectively. For the birdseye maple, two levels of figure intensity were used: wood with heavy figure and wood with light figure. Heavily figured birdseye maple wood was decayed significantly less by the brown rot fungus  Rhodonia placenta  than unfigured maple wood or lightly figured maple wood. However, heavily figured birdseye maple wood was decayed significantly more by two white rot fungi,  Trametes versicolor  and  Irpex lacteus , than unfigured maple wood but was not decayed significantly more than lightly figured wood. For both brown rot and white rot fungi, lightly figured birdseye maple wood did not decay significantly differently compared with unfigured wood. Likewise, there was no significant difference in decay between curly red maple wood and unfigured red maple wood for either brown rot or white rot fungi. Results suggest chemical or anatomical differences in the heavily figured birdseye sugar maple wood affect decay by brown rot and white rot fungi. These findings may be useful to hobbyists and woodworkers needing to protect wood or who partially decay wood to produce spalted wood for decorative purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wood and Fiber Science
Wood and Fiber Science 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: W&FS SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES INCLUDE THESE TOPIC AREAS: -Wood and Lignocellulosic Materials- Biomaterials- Timber Structures and Engineering- Biology- Nano-technology- Natural Fiber Composites- Timber Treatment and Harvesting- Botany- Mycology- Adhesives and Bioresins- Business Management and Marketing- Operations Research. SWST members have access to all full-text electronic versions of current and past Wood and Fiber Science issues.
期刊最新文献
IDENTIFICATION AND RECOGNIZATION OF BAMBOO BASED ON CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGES USING COMPUTER VISION Fiber Quality Prediction Using Nir Spectral Data: Tree-Based Ensemble Learning VS Deep Neural Networks PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT OF TASMANIAN PLANTATION EUCALYPTUS NITENS USING SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS Use of a Portable Near Infrared Spectrometer for Wood Identification of Four Dalbergia Species from Madagascar THE GLOBAL WOOD SPECIES PRIORITY LIST: A LIVING DATABASE OF TREE SPECIES MOST AT RISK FOR ILLEGAL LOGGING, UNSUSTAINABLE DEFORESTATION, AND HIGH RATES OF TRADE GLOBALLY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1