漂亮的价格是多少!游客愿意为樱花保护买单

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS Arts and the Market Pub Date : 2019-05-07 DOI:10.1108/AAM-02-2019-0010
F. Sussan, H. Nakagawa
{"title":"漂亮的价格是多少!游客愿意为樱花保护买单","authors":"F. Sussan, H. Nakagawa","doi":"10.1108/AAM-02-2019-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMapping the intrinsic value of the art of architecture and the art of nature within the context of Kakunodate and the preservation of its samurai manors and Sakura heritage trees, this paper proposes that from the perception of tourists, the preservation of both items is important. Extending the psychology of pricing that is subject to consumers’ preference and expectation to the context of valuation of cultural heritage assets, the purpose of this paper is to suggest that including the art of nature and the aesthetic of Sakura to the art of architecture (Samurai manors) will add more value to the cultural heritage of Kakunodate than when only the art of architecture is mentioned.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper uses Contingency Valuation Method to solicit tourists willingness-to-pay to preserve the architecture and the nature in Kakunodate. The survey uses a double bounded dichotomous choice model to elicit the various levels of tourists preference in various scenarios. Response from more than 1,000 tourists in three scenarios were collected. Through a maximum likelihood method and a subsequent truncated calculation, results are reported.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results support the conceptual argument that the art of nature adds value to the art of architecture only. Tourists are found to be willing to pay more to support both the architecture (samurai houses) and nature (cherry trees) than the samurai houses alone.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe research findings add to the inventory of research on prior works in heritage trees, conservation of trees and heritage tourism, and cultural heritage assets in general. The empirical findings support prior theoretical works that examined the relationship of nature and art, art and architecture, and architecture as visual consumption.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings have managerial implications for policy makers relative to a possible increase of revenue by adding accompanying-nature component to focal architectural assets when soliciting funding support.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe originality and this piece stems from extending trees as an art form in nature and its added value to architecture within the context of cultural heritage assets. The empirical findings add to the much discussed relationships among art, nature, and architecture.\n","PeriodicalId":42080,"journal":{"name":"Arts and the Market","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/AAM-02-2019-0010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What price beauty! Tourists willingness-to-pay for cherry blossom preservation\",\"authors\":\"F. Sussan, H. Nakagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/AAM-02-2019-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nMapping the intrinsic value of the art of architecture and the art of nature within the context of Kakunodate and the preservation of its samurai manors and Sakura heritage trees, this paper proposes that from the perception of tourists, the preservation of both items is important. Extending the psychology of pricing that is subject to consumers’ preference and expectation to the context of valuation of cultural heritage assets, the purpose of this paper is to suggest that including the art of nature and the aesthetic of Sakura to the art of architecture (Samurai manors) will add more value to the cultural heritage of Kakunodate than when only the art of architecture is mentioned.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper uses Contingency Valuation Method to solicit tourists willingness-to-pay to preserve the architecture and the nature in Kakunodate. The survey uses a double bounded dichotomous choice model to elicit the various levels of tourists preference in various scenarios. Response from more than 1,000 tourists in three scenarios were collected. Through a maximum likelihood method and a subsequent truncated calculation, results are reported.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results support the conceptual argument that the art of nature adds value to the art of architecture only. Tourists are found to be willing to pay more to support both the architecture (samurai houses) and nature (cherry trees) than the samurai houses alone.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe research findings add to the inventory of research on prior works in heritage trees, conservation of trees and heritage tourism, and cultural heritage assets in general. The empirical findings support prior theoretical works that examined the relationship of nature and art, art and architecture, and architecture as visual consumption.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings have managerial implications for policy makers relative to a possible increase of revenue by adding accompanying-nature component to focal architectural assets when soliciting funding support.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe originality and this piece stems from extending trees as an art form in nature and its added value to architecture within the context of cultural heritage assets. The empirical findings add to the much discussed relationships among art, nature, and architecture.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts and the Market\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/AAM-02-2019-0010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts and the Market\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAM-02-2019-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and the Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAM-02-2019-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在角宿馆及其武士庄园和樱花遗产树的保护背景下,绘制建筑艺术和自然艺术的内在价值,本文提出,从游客的角度来看,保护这两项都很重要。将受消费者偏好和期望影响的定价心理延伸到文化遗产资产估值的背景下,本文的目的是建议将自然艺术和樱花美学纳入建筑艺术(武士庄园)将比仅提及建筑艺术更能增加角馆文化遗产的价值。设计/方法/方法本文使用权变评估法来征求游客的意愿,以保护角厅的建筑和自然。本调查采用双界二分类选择模型来引出游客在不同场景下的不同偏好水平。调查收集了三种场景下1000多名游客的反馈。通过极大似然法和随后的截断计算,报告了结果。研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即自然艺术只会给建筑艺术增加价值。研究发现,游客愿意为建筑(武士屋)和自然(樱花树)支付更多的钱,而不仅仅是武士屋。研究的局限/意义研究结果补充了以往在文物树木、树木保育和文物旅游,以及一般文物资产方面的研究工作。实证研究结果支持了先前的理论工作,即研究自然与艺术、艺术与建筑以及建筑作为视觉消费的关系。实际意义在寻求资金支持时,通过在重点建筑资产中增加伴随性成分,这些发现对政策制定者具有管理意义。原创性/价值这个作品的原创性源于将树木作为一种自然艺术形式的延伸,以及它在文化遗产的背景下对建筑的附加价值。这些实证研究结果为艺术、自然和建筑之间的关系增添了许多讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What price beauty! Tourists willingness-to-pay for cherry blossom preservation
Purpose Mapping the intrinsic value of the art of architecture and the art of nature within the context of Kakunodate and the preservation of its samurai manors and Sakura heritage trees, this paper proposes that from the perception of tourists, the preservation of both items is important. Extending the psychology of pricing that is subject to consumers’ preference and expectation to the context of valuation of cultural heritage assets, the purpose of this paper is to suggest that including the art of nature and the aesthetic of Sakura to the art of architecture (Samurai manors) will add more value to the cultural heritage of Kakunodate than when only the art of architecture is mentioned. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses Contingency Valuation Method to solicit tourists willingness-to-pay to preserve the architecture and the nature in Kakunodate. The survey uses a double bounded dichotomous choice model to elicit the various levels of tourists preference in various scenarios. Response from more than 1,000 tourists in three scenarios were collected. Through a maximum likelihood method and a subsequent truncated calculation, results are reported. Findings The results support the conceptual argument that the art of nature adds value to the art of architecture only. Tourists are found to be willing to pay more to support both the architecture (samurai houses) and nature (cherry trees) than the samurai houses alone. Research limitations/implications The research findings add to the inventory of research on prior works in heritage trees, conservation of trees and heritage tourism, and cultural heritage assets in general. The empirical findings support prior theoretical works that examined the relationship of nature and art, art and architecture, and architecture as visual consumption. Practical implications The findings have managerial implications for policy makers relative to a possible increase of revenue by adding accompanying-nature component to focal architectural assets when soliciting funding support. Originality/value The originality and this piece stems from extending trees as an art form in nature and its added value to architecture within the context of cultural heritage assets. The empirical findings add to the much discussed relationships among art, nature, and architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Influence of movie-related online consumer reviews on movie choice: are there generational differences in processing information cues? Dance consumption and mood changes: Examining the role of gender and generational cohorts Participant-oriented evaluation through participatory action research: a case study of a community engagement approach Reading relationally: a proposal for relational-comparative research concerning city/capital of culture events Towards an “Evaluation Dilemmas Model” – designing an evaluation scheme for a European capital of culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1