基础数据治理动机:文献综述

IF 2.8 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Journal of Decision Systems Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1080/12460125.2022.2073637
M. Walsh, John McAvoy, David Sammon
{"title":"基础数据治理动机:文献综述","authors":"M. Walsh, John McAvoy, David Sammon","doi":"10.1080/12460125.2022.2073637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this review paper is to understand why organisations choose to implement data governance (DG) programmes. An understanding of these motivations will facilitate assessing the effectiveness of DG programmes. A search of the literature returned 628 publications for examination; of these 50 were deemed to be relevant to the research, and were selected for analysis and coding using a grounded theory approach. Our analysis found 115 organisational motivations for implementing DG, grouped into 23 categories. We use the Khatri and Brown framework to organise these categories across their five decision domains. The motivations are predominantly associated with operations and technology. This presents a challenge for organisations, where an over-focus on technology could lessen the business imperative. DG needs to be much more than an operational plan for managing the data asset. DG requires a holistic approach to succeed which suggests that all decision domains are considered adequately.","PeriodicalId":45565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Decision Systems","volume":"31 1","pages":"282 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grounding data governance motivations: a review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"M. Walsh, John McAvoy, David Sammon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12460125.2022.2073637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this review paper is to understand why organisations choose to implement data governance (DG) programmes. An understanding of these motivations will facilitate assessing the effectiveness of DG programmes. A search of the literature returned 628 publications for examination; of these 50 were deemed to be relevant to the research, and were selected for analysis and coding using a grounded theory approach. Our analysis found 115 organisational motivations for implementing DG, grouped into 23 categories. We use the Khatri and Brown framework to organise these categories across their five decision domains. The motivations are predominantly associated with operations and technology. This presents a challenge for organisations, where an over-focus on technology could lessen the business imperative. DG needs to be much more than an operational plan for managing the data asset. DG requires a holistic approach to succeed which suggests that all decision domains are considered adequately.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Decision Systems\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"282 - 298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Decision Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2073637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Decision Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2073637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇综述的目的是理解为什么组织选择实施数据治理(DG)计划。了解这些动机将有助于评估总干事方案的有效性。文献检索得到628份出版物供审查;其中50个被认为与研究相关,并被选择使用接地理论方法进行分析和编码。我们的分析发现了115个组织实施DG的动机,分为23类。我们使用Khatri和Brown框架将这些类别组织在他们的五个决策领域。这些动机主要与操作和技术有关。这给企业带来了挑战,过度关注技术可能会降低业务必要性。DG需要的不仅仅是管理数据资产的操作计划。DG需要一种全面的方法来取得成功,这表明所有决策领域都得到了充分的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grounding data governance motivations: a review of the literature
ABSTRACT The purpose of this review paper is to understand why organisations choose to implement data governance (DG) programmes. An understanding of these motivations will facilitate assessing the effectiveness of DG programmes. A search of the literature returned 628 publications for examination; of these 50 were deemed to be relevant to the research, and were selected for analysis and coding using a grounded theory approach. Our analysis found 115 organisational motivations for implementing DG, grouped into 23 categories. We use the Khatri and Brown framework to organise these categories across their five decision domains. The motivations are predominantly associated with operations and technology. This presents a challenge for organisations, where an over-focus on technology could lessen the business imperative. DG needs to be much more than an operational plan for managing the data asset. DG requires a holistic approach to succeed which suggests that all decision domains are considered adequately.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Decision Systems
Journal of Decision Systems OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Public acceptance of smart home technologies in the UK: a citizens’ jury study Perceptions of facilitators towards adoption of AI-based solutions for sustainable agriculture I am therefore, I do: a fit perspective of decision-making styles and business intelligence usage AI: A knowledge sharing tool for improving employees’ performance Data-driven decision making in advanced manufacturing Systems: modeling and analysis of critical success factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1