重新定义人道主义和发展部门的脆弱性和保障

IF 1.7 3区社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Social Politics Pub Date : 2021-01-07 DOI:10.1093/SP/JXAA040

G. Daoust, S. Dyvik

{"title":"重新定义人道主义和发展部门的脆弱性和保障","authors":"G. Daoust, S. Dyvik","doi":"10.1093/SP/JXAA040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Since 2018, \"safeguarding\" has been hailed as the answer to abuse, exploitation, and harassment in the humanitarian and development sector. However, safeguarding as a concept relies on conceptions of vulnerability, which are rarely critically interrogated. Bringing feminist, postcolonial, and critical disability studies to bear on what is conventionally viewed as an apolitical policy response, we argue that the need for safeguarding should be located within wider racialized, gendered, ableist, and geographic structures of power within which the sector is embedded. We conclude with theoretical reflections and directions for change centering intersectional and repoliticized conceptualizations of vulnerability and thus safeguarding.","PeriodicalId":47441,"journal":{"name":"Social Politics","volume":"29 1","pages":"355 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/SP/JXAA040","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing Vulnerability and Safeguarding in the Humanitarian and Development Sector\",\"authors\":\"G. Daoust, S. Dyvik\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/SP/JXAA040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Since 2018, \\\"safeguarding\\\" has been hailed as the answer to abuse, exploitation, and harassment in the humanitarian and development sector. However, safeguarding as a concept relies on conceptions of vulnerability, which are rarely critically interrogated. Bringing feminist, postcolonial, and critical disability studies to bear on what is conventionally viewed as an apolitical policy response, we argue that the need for safeguarding should be located within wider racialized, gendered, ableist, and geographic structures of power within which the sector is embedded. We conclude with theoretical reflections and directions for change centering intersectional and repoliticized conceptualizations of vulnerability and thus safeguarding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Politics\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"355 - 378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/SP/JXAA040\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/SP/JXAA040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/SP/JXAA040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要：自2018年以来，“保障”一直被誉为应对人道主义和发展部门的虐待、剥削和骚扰。然而，保障作为一个概念依赖于脆弱性的概念，而这些概念很少受到批判性的质疑。将女权主义、后殖民主义和批判性残疾研究与传统上被视为非政治性的政策回应相结合，我们认为，保障的必要性应该放在更广泛的种族化、性别化、能力主义和地理权力结构中，而该部门正是嵌入其中的。最后，我们对以跨部门和重新政治化的脆弱性概念为中心的变革进行了理论反思和指导，从而保障了脆弱性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Reconceptualizing Vulnerability and Safeguarding in the Humanitarian and Development Sector

Abstract:Since 2018, "safeguarding" has been hailed as the answer to abuse, exploitation, and harassment in the humanitarian and development sector. However, safeguarding as a concept relies on conceptions of vulnerability, which are rarely critically interrogated. Bringing feminist, postcolonial, and critical disability studies to bear on what is conventionally viewed as an apolitical policy response, we argue that the need for safeguarding should be located within wider racialized, gendered, ableist, and geographic structures of power within which the sector is embedded. We conclude with theoretical reflections and directions for change centering intersectional and repoliticized conceptualizations of vulnerability and thus safeguarding.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social Politics Multiple-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

10.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Politics is the journal for incisive analyses of gender, politics and policy across the globe. It takes on the critical emerging issues of our age: globalization, transnationality and citizenship, migration, diversity and its intersections, the restructuring of capitalisms and states. We engage with feminist theoretical issues and with theories of welfare regimes, "varieties of capitalism," the ideational and cultural turns in social science, governmentality and postcolonialism. We are looking for articles that engage in this exciting mix of debates that will be of interest to our multidisciplinary and international audience.