论士绅化的不公正

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Housing Theory & Society Pub Date : 2023-02-23 DOI:10.1080/14036096.2023.2181863
Casey J. Dawkins
{"title":"论士绅化的不公正","authors":"Casey J. Dawkins","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2023.2181863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article provides a survey and critique of several arguments advanced to support the claim that gentrification is unjust. I describe eight distinct injustices have been linked to gentrification: deprivation, estrangement, erasure, domination, censure, exploitation, disrespect, and marginalization. Scholars seeking to provide a comprehensive account of the injustices associated with gentrification must contend with the plural and contested nature of gentrification-induced injustice, the pervasiveness of domination as a distinct form of injustice and a component or contributor to other forms of injustice, and the difficulty of accommodating individual and collective forms of injustice within a single conception of justice. Although landlords, property owners, developers, and gentrifiers share blame for inflicting the harms of gentrification, states ultimately have the moral obligation to rectify the injustices of gentrification through the establishment of policies and institutions that discourage unjust actions.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"40 1","pages":"261 - 281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Injustices of Gentrification\",\"authors\":\"Casey J. Dawkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14036096.2023.2181863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article provides a survey and critique of several arguments advanced to support the claim that gentrification is unjust. I describe eight distinct injustices have been linked to gentrification: deprivation, estrangement, erasure, domination, censure, exploitation, disrespect, and marginalization. Scholars seeking to provide a comprehensive account of the injustices associated with gentrification must contend with the plural and contested nature of gentrification-induced injustice, the pervasiveness of domination as a distinct form of injustice and a component or contributor to other forms of injustice, and the difficulty of accommodating individual and collective forms of injustice within a single conception of justice. Although landlords, property owners, developers, and gentrifiers share blame for inflicting the harms of gentrification, states ultimately have the moral obligation to rectify the injustices of gentrification through the establishment of policies and institutions that discourage unjust actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Theory & Society\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"261 - 281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Theory & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2181863\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Theory & Society","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2181863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文对支持士绅化不公正主张的几个论点进行了调查和批评。我描述了与绅士化有关的八种明显的不公正现象:剥夺、疏远、抹杀、统治、谴责、剥削、不尊重和边缘化。想要全面描述与士绅化相关的不公正现象的学者们必须应对士绅化引发的不公正的复数和有争议的性质,统治作为一种独特的不公正形式和其他形式不公正的组成部分或贡献者的普遍性,以及难以在单一的正义概念中容纳个人和集体形式的不公正。尽管房东、业主、开发商和士绅化者都对造成士绅化的危害负有责任,但国家最终有道德义务通过制定政策和制度来遏制不公正行为,从而纠正士绅化中的不公正现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Injustices of Gentrification
ABSTRACT This article provides a survey and critique of several arguments advanced to support the claim that gentrification is unjust. I describe eight distinct injustices have been linked to gentrification: deprivation, estrangement, erasure, domination, censure, exploitation, disrespect, and marginalization. Scholars seeking to provide a comprehensive account of the injustices associated with gentrification must contend with the plural and contested nature of gentrification-induced injustice, the pervasiveness of domination as a distinct form of injustice and a component or contributor to other forms of injustice, and the difficulty of accommodating individual and collective forms of injustice within a single conception of justice. Although landlords, property owners, developers, and gentrifiers share blame for inflicting the harms of gentrification, states ultimately have the moral obligation to rectify the injustices of gentrification through the establishment of policies and institutions that discourage unjust actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Co-Living, Gentlemen’s Clubs, and Residential Hotels: A Long View of Shared Housing Infrastructures for Single Young Professionals Toward a feminist housing commons? Conceptualising care - (as) - work in collaborative housing Acquaintances or Familiar Strangers? How Similarity and Spatial Proximity Shape Neighbour Relations within Residential Buildings Balancing Accumulation and Affordability: How Dutch Housing Politics Moved from Private-Rental Liberalization to Regulation Green Neighbourhood Identity: How Residents Use Urban Nature Against Territorial Stigmatization in Finnish Housing Estates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1