数据驱动的治理和问责绩效:来自美国农业环境政策的重要反思

IF 2.5 3区哲学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Science As Culture Pub Date : 2023-02-08 DOI:10.1080/09505431.2023.2175654

Ritwick Ghosh

引用次数: 2

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Data-driven governance and performances of accountability: critical reflections from US agri-environmental policy

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Science As Culture Multiple-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Our culture is a scientific one, defining what is natural and what is rational. Its values can be seen in what are sought out as facts and made as artefacts, what are designed as processes and products, and what are forged as weapons and filmed as wonders. In our daily experience, power is exercised through expertise, e.g. in science, technology and medicine. Science as Culture explores how all these shape the values which contend for influence over the wider society. Science mediates our cultural experience. It increasingly defines what it is to be a person, through genetics, medicine and information technology. Its values get embodied and naturalized in concepts, techniques, research priorities, gadgets and advertising. Many films, artworks and novels express popular concerns about these developments. In a society where icons of progress are drawn from science, technology and medicine, they are either celebrated or demonised. Often their progress is feared as ’unnatural’, while their critics are labelled ’irrational’. Public concerns are rebuffed by ostensibly value-neutral experts and positivist polemics. Yet the culture of science is open to study like any other culture. Cultural studies analyses the role of expertise throughout society. Many journals address the history, philosophy and social studies of science, its popularisation, and the public understanding of society.