音乐学院乐器教师对评价的功能和目的的看法

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Foro de Educacion Pub Date : 2020-01-04 DOI:10.14516/fde.651
Aránzazu González Royo, Alfredo Bautista
{"title":"音乐学院乐器教师对评价的功能和目的的看法","authors":"Aránzazu González Royo, Alfredo Bautista","doi":"10.14516/fde.651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most research on teachers’ ideas about assessment comes from studies conducted with general education teachers (e.g., primary, secondary, university). In contrast, there are only a few studies focused on teachers of art-related disciplines, specifically those who teach instrumental performance in music conservatories. The aim of this study was to describe the ideas that instrumental music teachers have on the functions and purposes of assessment, comparing them with the ideas outlined in the current music curriculum. Participants were 18 teachers from different instrumental specialties, who taught at state-funded conservatories within the autonomous Community of Madrid. We conducted semi­structured interviews in which we asked teachers about the purposes that they had in mind when assessing students. Responses were analyzed using content analysis. Findings showed that the most frequently mentioned primary purposes of assessment were summative, formative and self­assessment, while grading students appeared most frequently as a secondary purpose. Few teachers refereed to the formative purpose. In addition, we found that the teachers’ responses alluded to both social and educational functions of assessment. We conclude that the ideas of the interviewed teachers reflected what is prescribed in the current music curriculum only partially, given the marginal role of the formative purpose as compared with curriculum guidelines. Limitations of the study are discussed. We suggest that researchers should conduct future research addressing the tensions between educational and social functions of assessment throughout each educational cycle.","PeriodicalId":43476,"journal":{"name":"Foro de Educacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideas de los profesores de instrumento de conservatorio sobre las funciones y finalidades de la evaluación\",\"authors\":\"Aránzazu González Royo, Alfredo Bautista\",\"doi\":\"10.14516/fde.651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most research on teachers’ ideas about assessment comes from studies conducted with general education teachers (e.g., primary, secondary, university). In contrast, there are only a few studies focused on teachers of art-related disciplines, specifically those who teach instrumental performance in music conservatories. The aim of this study was to describe the ideas that instrumental music teachers have on the functions and purposes of assessment, comparing them with the ideas outlined in the current music curriculum. Participants were 18 teachers from different instrumental specialties, who taught at state-funded conservatories within the autonomous Community of Madrid. We conducted semi­structured interviews in which we asked teachers about the purposes that they had in mind when assessing students. Responses were analyzed using content analysis. Findings showed that the most frequently mentioned primary purposes of assessment were summative, formative and self­assessment, while grading students appeared most frequently as a secondary purpose. Few teachers refereed to the formative purpose. In addition, we found that the teachers’ responses alluded to both social and educational functions of assessment. We conclude that the ideas of the interviewed teachers reflected what is prescribed in the current music curriculum only partially, given the marginal role of the formative purpose as compared with curriculum guidelines. Limitations of the study are discussed. We suggest that researchers should conduct future research addressing the tensions between educational and social functions of assessment throughout each educational cycle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foro de Educacion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foro de Educacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foro de Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大多数关于教师评估思想的研究来自对普通教育教师(如小学、中学、大学)的研究。相比之下,只有少数研究关注艺术相关学科的教师,特别是那些在音乐学院教授器乐表演的教师。本研究的目的是描述器乐教师对评估功能和目的的看法,并将其与当前音乐课程中概述的看法进行比较。参与者是来自不同乐器专业的18名教师,他们在马德里自治区内的国家资助的音乐学院任教。我们进行了半结构化的访谈,询问教师在评估学生时的目的。使用内容分析对回复进行分析。研究结果表明,最常被提及的评估主要目的是总结性、形成性和自我评估,而给学生打分最常被视为次要目的。很少有老师提到形成目的。此外,我们发现教师的反应暗示了评估的社会和教育功能。我们得出的结论是,受访教师的想法只部分反映了当前音乐课程中的规定,因为与课程指南相比,形成目的的作用微不足道。讨论了该研究的局限性。我们建议研究人员在未来进行研究,解决每个教育周期评估的教育功能和社会功能之间的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ideas de los profesores de instrumento de conservatorio sobre las funciones y finalidades de la evaluación
Most research on teachers’ ideas about assessment comes from studies conducted with general education teachers (e.g., primary, secondary, university). In contrast, there are only a few studies focused on teachers of art-related disciplines, specifically those who teach instrumental performance in music conservatories. The aim of this study was to describe the ideas that instrumental music teachers have on the functions and purposes of assessment, comparing them with the ideas outlined in the current music curriculum. Participants were 18 teachers from different instrumental specialties, who taught at state-funded conservatories within the autonomous Community of Madrid. We conducted semi­structured interviews in which we asked teachers about the purposes that they had in mind when assessing students. Responses were analyzed using content analysis. Findings showed that the most frequently mentioned primary purposes of assessment were summative, formative and self­assessment, while grading students appeared most frequently as a secondary purpose. Few teachers refereed to the formative purpose. In addition, we found that the teachers’ responses alluded to both social and educational functions of assessment. We conclude that the ideas of the interviewed teachers reflected what is prescribed in the current music curriculum only partially, given the marginal role of the formative purpose as compared with curriculum guidelines. Limitations of the study are discussed. We suggest that researchers should conduct future research addressing the tensions between educational and social functions of assessment throughout each educational cycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foro de Educacion
Foro de Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pedagogies of precariousness in the neoliberal educational order. Insecurity and recomposition of possibilities in the current political-pedagogical context Dificultades y desafíos de integración de los estudiantes venezolanos en Colombia desde la voz de sus docentes El papel de la educación para la prevención de violencias machistas. Estudio cualitativo en Lamu, Kenia La belleza ante el reto de educar para la sostenibilidad Conectividad e inclusión: el panorama argentino de la precariedad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1