网络自由度排名的政治性

IF 3.6 Q1 COMMUNICATION Internet Policy Review Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:10.14763/2023.2.1710

T. Lokot, M. Wijermars

{"title":"网络自由度排名的政治性","authors":"T. Lokot, M. Wijermars","doi":"10.14763/2023.2.1710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International rankings play an active role in defining the issue they claim to capture and giving the issue salience by presenting it as a matter of global concern. As internet access expanded globally, the past two decades have seen a rapid proliferation of indexes measuring and comparing the state of internet freedom around the globe. This article examines the politics of these rankings, e","PeriodicalId":45799,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The politics of internet freedom rankings\",\"authors\":\"T. Lokot, M. Wijermars\",\"doi\":\"10.14763/2023.2.1710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International rankings play an active role in defining the issue they claim to capture and giving the issue salience by presenting it as a matter of global concern. As internet access expanded globally, the past two decades have seen a rapid proliferation of indexes measuring and comparing the state of internet freedom around the globe. This article examines the politics of these rankings, e\",\"PeriodicalId\":45799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Policy Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.2.1710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.2.1710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

国际排名在定义他们声称要抓住的问题方面发挥着积极作用，并通过将其作为全球关注的问题来突出这一问题。随着互联网接入在全球范围内的扩大，过去二十年来，衡量和比较全球互联网自由状况的指数迅速激增。这篇文章考察了这些排名的政治性

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The politics of internet freedom rankings

International rankings play an active role in defining the issue they claim to capture and giving the issue salience by presenting it as a matter of global concern. As internet access expanded globally, the past two decades have seen a rapid proliferation of indexes measuring and comparing the state of internet freedom around the globe. This article examines the politics of these rankings, e

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊