政策措施对与工作有关的健康风险的影响——定量和定性相结合

S. G. van den Heuvel, R. Vergeer, Marjolein de Weerd
{"title":"政策措施对与工作有关的健康风险的影响——定量和定性相结合","authors":"S. G. van den Heuvel, R. Vergeer, Marjolein de Weerd","doi":"10.1080/14773996.2017.1415421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Policy-makers have an urgent need for quantitative data to support their decision-making process. Since quantitative data are rarely available, the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is needed to estimate the consequences of a policy measure. In this study, we will estimate the effects of the abolishment of the risk assessment obligation on work-related health risks at small companies in low risk sectors (SCLR) in the Netherlands, using a mixed methods approach. Data were derived from surveys, literature and expert elicitation. A reduction of 26% in the number of preventive measures was predicted. However, compliance with the policy measure in SCLR was very low (27%). In all scenarios, we found statistically significant but small unfavourable effects on the exposure to work-related health risks. We concluded that the abolishment of the risk assessment obligation in SCLR will have no large effects on health and health costs.","PeriodicalId":43946,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2017.1415421","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of a policy measure on work-related health risks – combine the quantitative and the qualitative\",\"authors\":\"S. G. van den Heuvel, R. Vergeer, Marjolein de Weerd\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14773996.2017.1415421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Policy-makers have an urgent need for quantitative data to support their decision-making process. Since quantitative data are rarely available, the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is needed to estimate the consequences of a policy measure. In this study, we will estimate the effects of the abolishment of the risk assessment obligation on work-related health risks at small companies in low risk sectors (SCLR) in the Netherlands, using a mixed methods approach. Data were derived from surveys, literature and expert elicitation. A reduction of 26% in the number of preventive measures was predicted. However, compliance with the policy measure in SCLR was very low (27%). In all scenarios, we found statistically significant but small unfavourable effects on the exposure to work-related health risks. We concluded that the abolishment of the risk assessment obligation in SCLR will have no large effects on health and health costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2017.1415421\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2017.1415421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2017.1415421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

决策者迫切需要定量数据来支持他们的决策过程。由于很少有定量数据,因此需要结合定量和定性方法来估计一项政策措施的后果。在本研究中,我们将采用混合方法,估计取消风险评估义务对荷兰低风险部门(SCLR)小公司工作相关健康风险的影响。数据来源于调查、文献和专家的启发。预计预防措施的数量将减少26%。然而,对SCLR政策措施的依从性非常低(27%)。在所有情况下,我们发现统计上显著但较小的不利影响暴露于与工作有关的健康风险。我们的结论是,在SCLR中取消风险评估义务不会对健康和健康成本产生大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of a policy measure on work-related health risks – combine the quantitative and the qualitative
Abstract Policy-makers have an urgent need for quantitative data to support their decision-making process. Since quantitative data are rarely available, the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is needed to estimate the consequences of a policy measure. In this study, we will estimate the effects of the abolishment of the risk assessment obligation on work-related health risks at small companies in low risk sectors (SCLR) in the Netherlands, using a mixed methods approach. Data were derived from surveys, literature and expert elicitation. A reduction of 26% in the number of preventive measures was predicted. However, compliance with the policy measure in SCLR was very low (27%). In all scenarios, we found statistically significant but small unfavourable effects on the exposure to work-related health risks. We concluded that the abolishment of the risk assessment obligation in SCLR will have no large effects on health and health costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety risk factors in two different types of routine outsourced work: a systematic literature review Multimodal virtual environments: an opportunity to improve fire safety training? Road traffic collisions leading to human casualties in Riyadh: a retrospective study Addressing essential skills gaps among participants in an OHS training program: a pilot study Farewell from the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1