老年人先前认知水平个性化认知刺激的有效性

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERONTOLOGY Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1097/TGR.0000000000000345
E. Calatayud, C. Jiménez-Sánchez, S. Calvo, N. Brandín-de la Cruz, Pablo Herrero, I. Gómez-Soria
{"title":"老年人先前认知水平个性化认知刺激的有效性","authors":"E. Calatayud, C. Jiménez-Sánchez, S. Calvo, N. Brandín-de la Cruz, Pablo Herrero, I. Gómez-Soria","doi":"10.1097/TGR.0000000000000345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. This randomized clinical trial analyzed whether a personalized cognitive stimulation based on the individual's preexisting cognitive levels may be more effective in the short and long terms than a standard cognitive stimulation program. In total, 288 older adults were randomized into an intervention group and a control group, stratified according to their cognitive levels. There were significant differences between groups, with a small effect size at postintervention (10 weeks), follow-up I (26 weeks), and follow-up II (52 weeks) (P < .001, 0.2 <r < 0.4) and in the cognitive category (P < .001). The personalization of cognitive stimulation is effective to maintain normal cognitive functioning and to delay cognitive decline.","PeriodicalId":45972,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation","volume":"38 1","pages":"73 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Cognitive Stimulation Personalized by the Preexisting Cognitive Level in Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"E. Calatayud, C. Jiménez-Sánchez, S. Calvo, N. Brandín-de la Cruz, Pablo Herrero, I. Gómez-Soria\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TGR.0000000000000345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. This randomized clinical trial analyzed whether a personalized cognitive stimulation based on the individual's preexisting cognitive levels may be more effective in the short and long terms than a standard cognitive stimulation program. In total, 288 older adults were randomized into an intervention group and a control group, stratified according to their cognitive levels. There were significant differences between groups, with a small effect size at postintervention (10 weeks), follow-up I (26 weeks), and follow-up II (52 weeks) (P < .001, 0.2 <r < 0.4) and in the cognitive category (P < .001). The personalization of cognitive stimulation is effective to maintain normal cognitive functioning and to delay cognitive decline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TGR.0000000000000345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TGR.0000000000000345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

文本中提供了补充数字内容。这项随机临床试验分析了基于个体先前存在的认知水平的个性化认知刺激在短期和长期内是否比标准认知刺激计划更有效。总共有288名老年人被随机分为干预组和对照组,根据他们的认知水平进行分层。两组之间存在显著差异,干预后(10周)、随访I(26周)和随访II(52周)的影响较小(P<.001,0.2本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Cognitive Stimulation Personalized by the Preexisting Cognitive Level in Older Adults
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. This randomized clinical trial analyzed whether a personalized cognitive stimulation based on the individual's preexisting cognitive levels may be more effective in the short and long terms than a standard cognitive stimulation program. In total, 288 older adults were randomized into an intervention group and a control group, stratified according to their cognitive levels. There were significant differences between groups, with a small effect size at postintervention (10 weeks), follow-up I (26 weeks), and follow-up II (52 weeks) (P < .001, 0.2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, (TGR) is a peer-reviewed journal that presents clinical, basic, and applied research, as well as theoretic information, consolidated into a clinically relevant format and provides a resource for the healthcare professional practicing in the area of geriatric rehabilitation. TGR provides useful, treatment-related information written by and for specialists in all aspects of geriatric care. Each issue focuses on a specific topic, providing dependable hands-on tips and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Caregiver Support Role in Occupational Therapy Video Telehealth: A Scoping Review. Validity and Reliability of Virtually Obtained Functional Outcomes in Older Adults Teleassessment of Balance and Gait Outcome Measures in Older Adults Emergency Management During Telehealth 1RM Living
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1