希腊版爱荷华孕妇婴儿喂养态度量表的信度和效度

M. Iliadou, K. Lykeridou, P. Prezerakos, C. Tzavara, S. Tziaferi
{"title":"希腊版爱荷华孕妇婴儿喂养态度量表的信度和效度","authors":"M. Iliadou, K. Lykeridou, P. Prezerakos, C. Tzavara, S. Tziaferi","doi":"10.5455/msm.2019.31.160-165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A modifiable factor related to breastfeeding is breastfeeding attitudes. The Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS) is used to evaluate this factor. Although the breastfeeding rates in Greece are declined there is not available any validated instrument to evaluate infant feeding attitudes. Aim: to determine the psychometric properties of the Greek adaptation of the IIFAS in a sample of pregnant women. Materials and Methods: Pregnant women (N=203) from a University Hospital in Athens, Greece, were administered the Greek version of the IIFAS, while being in hospital, and their infant feeding mode at six months postpartum was recorded by telephone. The reliability of the scale was assessed by using corrected item-total correlations and Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity of the scale was assessed by using confirmatory factor analysis and predictive validity by using t-tests. Multiple linear regression analyses in a stepwise method (p for removal was set at 0.1 and p for entry was set at .05) was performed in order to find variables independently associated with IIFAS total score. Results: The mean IIFAS score was 70.0 (SD=7.6). The corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.22 to 0.51. Cronbach’s alpha was equal to 0.71. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated an adequate fit of the one-factor model. Concerning the predictive validity of IIFAS it was significant for breastfeeding at six months. The mean IIFAS score was significantly greater (p=0.001) for women that had exclusive breastfeeding at six months (mean (SD): 68.4(6.6)) as compared with those that did not (mean (SD): 64.0(7.5)). Higher IIFAS scores were found in older women, with higher educational level and in those that had breastfed children in their social environment. Conclusion: The Greek version of the IIFAS demonstrated satisfying reliability and validity for measuring women’s infant feeding attitudes in the Greek context. Also, the results of the present study provide further evidence of the international applicability of the IIFAS.","PeriodicalId":94128,"journal":{"name":"Materia socio-medica","volume":"31 1","pages":"160 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and Validity of the Greek Version of the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale Among Pregnant Women\",\"authors\":\"M. Iliadou, K. Lykeridou, P. Prezerakos, C. Tzavara, S. Tziaferi\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/msm.2019.31.160-165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: A modifiable factor related to breastfeeding is breastfeeding attitudes. The Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS) is used to evaluate this factor. Although the breastfeeding rates in Greece are declined there is not available any validated instrument to evaluate infant feeding attitudes. Aim: to determine the psychometric properties of the Greek adaptation of the IIFAS in a sample of pregnant women. Materials and Methods: Pregnant women (N=203) from a University Hospital in Athens, Greece, were administered the Greek version of the IIFAS, while being in hospital, and their infant feeding mode at six months postpartum was recorded by telephone. The reliability of the scale was assessed by using corrected item-total correlations and Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity of the scale was assessed by using confirmatory factor analysis and predictive validity by using t-tests. Multiple linear regression analyses in a stepwise method (p for removal was set at 0.1 and p for entry was set at .05) was performed in order to find variables independently associated with IIFAS total score. Results: The mean IIFAS score was 70.0 (SD=7.6). The corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.22 to 0.51. Cronbach’s alpha was equal to 0.71. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated an adequate fit of the one-factor model. Concerning the predictive validity of IIFAS it was significant for breastfeeding at six months. The mean IIFAS score was significantly greater (p=0.001) for women that had exclusive breastfeeding at six months (mean (SD): 68.4(6.6)) as compared with those that did not (mean (SD): 64.0(7.5)). Higher IIFAS scores were found in older women, with higher educational level and in those that had breastfed children in their social environment. Conclusion: The Greek version of the IIFAS demonstrated satisfying reliability and validity for measuring women’s infant feeding attitudes in the Greek context. Also, the results of the present study provide further evidence of the international applicability of the IIFAS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materia socio-medica\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"160 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materia socio-medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2019.31.160-165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materia socio-medica","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2019.31.160-165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

与母乳喂养有关的一个可改变的因素是母乳喂养态度。爱荷华州婴儿喂养态度量表(IIFAS)用于评估这一因素。虽然希腊的母乳喂养率有所下降,但没有任何有效的工具来评估婴儿喂养态度。目的:确定孕妇样本中希腊语适应IIFAS的心理测量特性。材料与方法:203名来自希腊雅典某大学医院的孕妇在住院期间使用希腊版IIFAS,并在产后6个月通过电话记录其婴儿喂养模式。量表的可靠性通过使用校正的项目-总量相关性和Cronbach’s alpha来评估。量表的建构效度采用验证性因子分析,预测效度采用t检验。采用逐步方法进行多元线性回归分析(去除p设为0.1,进入p设为0.05),以找到与IIFAS总分独立相关的变量。结果:平均IIFAS评分为70.0 (SD=7.6)。修正后的项目-总相关系数在0.22 - 0.51之间。Cronbach 's alpha = 0.71。验证性因子分析表明单因素模型拟合良好。关于IIFAS的预测有效性,6个月母乳喂养显著。在六个月时进行纯母乳喂养的妇女(平均(SD): 68.4(6.6))的平均IIFAS评分显著高于未进行纯母乳喂养的妇女(平均(SD): 64.0(7.5)) (p=0.001)。在年龄较大、受教育程度较高以及在社会环境中母乳喂养儿童的妇女中,IIFAS得分较高。结论:希腊版本的IIFAS显示了令人满意的信度和效度来测量希腊背景下妇女喂养婴儿的态度。此外,本研究的结果进一步证明了国际财务会计准则的国际适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and Validity of the Greek Version of the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale Among Pregnant Women
Introduction: A modifiable factor related to breastfeeding is breastfeeding attitudes. The Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS) is used to evaluate this factor. Although the breastfeeding rates in Greece are declined there is not available any validated instrument to evaluate infant feeding attitudes. Aim: to determine the psychometric properties of the Greek adaptation of the IIFAS in a sample of pregnant women. Materials and Methods: Pregnant women (N=203) from a University Hospital in Athens, Greece, were administered the Greek version of the IIFAS, while being in hospital, and their infant feeding mode at six months postpartum was recorded by telephone. The reliability of the scale was assessed by using corrected item-total correlations and Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity of the scale was assessed by using confirmatory factor analysis and predictive validity by using t-tests. Multiple linear regression analyses in a stepwise method (p for removal was set at 0.1 and p for entry was set at .05) was performed in order to find variables independently associated with IIFAS total score. Results: The mean IIFAS score was 70.0 (SD=7.6). The corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.22 to 0.51. Cronbach’s alpha was equal to 0.71. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated an adequate fit of the one-factor model. Concerning the predictive validity of IIFAS it was significant for breastfeeding at six months. The mean IIFAS score was significantly greater (p=0.001) for women that had exclusive breastfeeding at six months (mean (SD): 68.4(6.6)) as compared with those that did not (mean (SD): 64.0(7.5)). Higher IIFAS scores were found in older women, with higher educational level and in those that had breastfed children in their social environment. Conclusion: The Greek version of the IIFAS demonstrated satisfying reliability and validity for measuring women’s infant feeding attitudes in the Greek context. Also, the results of the present study provide further evidence of the international applicability of the IIFAS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Mediating Role of Anxiety in the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Psychosocial Functions of Nurses and Pediatricians in PICUs. Characteristics and Related Factors of Bacterial Infection Among Patients With Cirrhosis. Evaluation of the Cartinorm Use in the Therapy of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Lymph Nodes in Metastatic Cancer and Lymphoma: Our Single-institution Experience. The Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment White Blood Cell and Platelet Counts for Survival Outcome in Primary Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1