后台研究复原力研究人员——医疗保健复原力研究项目中数据收集的困境和原则

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Health Governance Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI:10.1108/ijhg-07-2022-0068
S. Wiig, Cecilie Haraldseid-Driftland, Heidi Dombestein, Hilda Bø Lyng, E. Ree, Birte Fagerdal, Lene Schibevaag, Veslemøy Guise
{"title":"后台研究复原力研究人员——医疗保健复原力研究项目中数据收集的困境和原则","authors":"S. Wiig, Cecilie Haraldseid-Driftland, Heidi Dombestein, Hilda Bø Lyng, E. Ree, Birte Fagerdal, Lene Schibevaag, Veslemøy Guise","doi":"10.1108/ijhg-07-2022-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeResilience in healthcare is fundamental for what constitutes quality in healthcare. To understand healthcare resilience, resilience research needs a multilevel perspective, diverse research designs, and taking advantage of different data sources. However, approaching resilience researchers as a data source is a new approach within this field and needs careful consideration to ensure that research is trustworthy and ethically sound. The aim of this short “backstage” general review paper is to give a snapshot of how the Resilience in Healthcare (RiH) research program identified and dealt with potential methodological and ethical challenges in researching researcher colleagues.Design/methodology/approachThe authors first provide an overview of the main challenges and benefits from the literature on researching researcher colleagues. Second, the authors demonstrate how this literature was used to guide strategies and principles adopted in the RiH research process.FindingsThe paper describes established principles and a checklist for data collection and analysis to overcome potential dilemmas and challenges to ensure trustworthiness and transparency in the process.Originality/valueMining the knowledge and experience of resilience researchers is fundamental for taking the research field to the next step, and furthermore an approach that is relevant across different research fields. This paper provides guidance on how other research projects can approach researcher colleagues in similar ways to gain new insight, build theory and advance their research field based on insider competence.","PeriodicalId":42859,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Backstage researching resilience researchers – dilemmas and principles for data collection in the resilience in healthcare research program\",\"authors\":\"S. Wiig, Cecilie Haraldseid-Driftland, Heidi Dombestein, Hilda Bø Lyng, E. Ree, Birte Fagerdal, Lene Schibevaag, Veslemøy Guise\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijhg-07-2022-0068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeResilience in healthcare is fundamental for what constitutes quality in healthcare. To understand healthcare resilience, resilience research needs a multilevel perspective, diverse research designs, and taking advantage of different data sources. However, approaching resilience researchers as a data source is a new approach within this field and needs careful consideration to ensure that research is trustworthy and ethically sound. The aim of this short “backstage” general review paper is to give a snapshot of how the Resilience in Healthcare (RiH) research program identified and dealt with potential methodological and ethical challenges in researching researcher colleagues.Design/methodology/approachThe authors first provide an overview of the main challenges and benefits from the literature on researching researcher colleagues. Second, the authors demonstrate how this literature was used to guide strategies and principles adopted in the RiH research process.FindingsThe paper describes established principles and a checklist for data collection and analysis to overcome potential dilemmas and challenges to ensure trustworthiness and transparency in the process.Originality/valueMining the knowledge and experience of resilience researchers is fundamental for taking the research field to the next step, and furthermore an approach that is relevant across different research fields. This paper provides guidance on how other research projects can approach researcher colleagues in similar ways to gain new insight, build theory and advance their research field based on insider competence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-07-2022-0068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-07-2022-0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的医疗保健的弹性是构成医疗保健质量的基础。为了理解医疗弹性,弹性研究需要多层次的视角、多样化的研究设计,并利用不同的数据来源。然而,将复原力研究人员作为数据来源是该领域的一种新方法,需要仔细考虑,以确保研究是可信的和合乎道德的。这篇简短的“后台”综述论文的目的是简要介绍医疗保健弹性(RiH)研究项目如何识别和应对研究同事中潜在的方法和伦理挑战。设计/方法论/方法作者首先概述了研究同事文献中的主要挑战和好处。其次,作者展示了这些文献是如何用于指导RiH研究过程中采用的策略和原则的。发现本文描述了数据收集和分析的既定原则和清单,以克服潜在的困境和挑战,确保过程中的可信度和透明度。独创性/价值挖掘韧性研究人员的知识和经验是将研究领域推向下一步的基础,也是一种跨不同研究领域的相关方法。本文为其他研究项目如何以类似的方式接近研究人员同事提供了指导,以获得新的见解,建立理论,并在内部能力的基础上推进其研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Backstage researching resilience researchers – dilemmas and principles for data collection in the resilience in healthcare research program
PurposeResilience in healthcare is fundamental for what constitutes quality in healthcare. To understand healthcare resilience, resilience research needs a multilevel perspective, diverse research designs, and taking advantage of different data sources. However, approaching resilience researchers as a data source is a new approach within this field and needs careful consideration to ensure that research is trustworthy and ethically sound. The aim of this short “backstage” general review paper is to give a snapshot of how the Resilience in Healthcare (RiH) research program identified and dealt with potential methodological and ethical challenges in researching researcher colleagues.Design/methodology/approachThe authors first provide an overview of the main challenges and benefits from the literature on researching researcher colleagues. Second, the authors demonstrate how this literature was used to guide strategies and principles adopted in the RiH research process.FindingsThe paper describes established principles and a checklist for data collection and analysis to overcome potential dilemmas and challenges to ensure trustworthiness and transparency in the process.Originality/valueMining the knowledge and experience of resilience researchers is fundamental for taking the research field to the next step, and furthermore an approach that is relevant across different research fields. This paper provides guidance on how other research projects can approach researcher colleagues in similar ways to gain new insight, build theory and advance their research field based on insider competence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Governance
International Journal of Health Governance HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Governance (IJHG) is oriented to serve those at the policy and governance levels within government, healthcare systems or healthcare organizations. It bridges the academic, public and private sectors, presenting case studies, research papers, reviews and viewpoints to provide an understanding of health governance that is both practical and actionable for practitioners, managers and policy makers. Policy and governance to promote, maintain or restore health extends beyond the clinical care aspect alone.
期刊最新文献
What influences perceptions about the concept of return on investment from healthcare quality improvement programmes? An institutional theory perspective What influences perceptions about the concept of return on investment from healthcare quality improvement programmes? An institutional theory perspective Doctors only blame the patients: a systems analysis of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) Exploring the quality of life of palliative care patients: empirical evidence from India The role of governance in mitigating an epidemic disease: evidence from HIV prevalence in 45 Sub-Saharan African countries, 1996–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1