从流行语到批判心理学:邀请认真对待交叉性

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Women & Therapy Pub Date : 2020-03-19 DOI:10.1080/02703149.2020.1729473
P. Grzanka
{"title":"从流行语到批判心理学:邀请认真对待交叉性","authors":"P. Grzanka","doi":"10.1080/02703149.2020.1729473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, I introduce a framework that invites psychologists to take intersectionality seriously. First, I revisit some primary tools of intersectional analysis and underscore their relevance to critical training. I then sketch out a flexible typology of what intersectionality is and, more consequentially, what it is not. Next, I consider how intersectionality can help to reimagine the relationships between complementary and competing paradigms in multicultural feminist theory. Finally, I extend Cole’s three-question framework for intersectional research in psychology to develop practical questions that might deepen psychology’s engagement with intersectionality at the level of critical pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":46696,"journal":{"name":"Women & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729473","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Buzzword to Critical Psychology: An Invitation to Take Intersectionality Seriously\",\"authors\":\"P. Grzanka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02703149.2020.1729473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this paper, I introduce a framework that invites psychologists to take intersectionality seriously. First, I revisit some primary tools of intersectional analysis and underscore their relevance to critical training. I then sketch out a flexible typology of what intersectionality is and, more consequentially, what it is not. Next, I consider how intersectionality can help to reimagine the relationships between complementary and competing paradigms in multicultural feminist theory. Finally, I extend Cole’s three-question framework for intersectional research in psychology to develop practical questions that might deepen psychology’s engagement with intersectionality at the level of critical pedagogy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women & Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729473\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729473\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

在本文中,我介绍了一个框架,邀请心理学家认真对待交叉性。首先,我回顾了交叉分析的一些主要工具,并强调了它们与关键训练的相关性。然后我勾勒出一个灵活的类型,什么是交叉性,更重要的是,什么不是。接下来,我将考虑交叉性如何帮助重新想象多元文化女权主义理论中互补和竞争范式之间的关系。最后,我扩展了科尔的心理学交叉研究的三问题框架,以发展实际问题,这些问题可能会加深心理学在批判教育学水平上与交叉性的接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Buzzword to Critical Psychology: An Invitation to Take Intersectionality Seriously
Abstract In this paper, I introduce a framework that invites psychologists to take intersectionality seriously. First, I revisit some primary tools of intersectional analysis and underscore their relevance to critical training. I then sketch out a flexible typology of what intersectionality is and, more consequentially, what it is not. Next, I consider how intersectionality can help to reimagine the relationships between complementary and competing paradigms in multicultural feminist theory. Finally, I extend Cole’s three-question framework for intersectional research in psychology to develop practical questions that might deepen psychology’s engagement with intersectionality at the level of critical pedagogy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Women & Therapy
Women & Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Women & Therapy is the only professional journal that focuses entirely on the complex interrelationship between women and the therapeutic experience. Devoted to descriptive, theoretical, clinical, and empirical perspectives on the topic of women and therapy, the journal is intended for feminist practitioners as well as for individuals interested in the practice of feminist therapy. The journal focuses on a wide range of content areas, including: •issues in the process of therapy with female clients •problems in living that affect women in greater proportion than men, such as depression, eating disorders, and agoraphobia •women"s traditional and nontraditional roles in society and how these affect and can be affected by therapy.
期刊最新文献
Applying Black Feminist Theory to Research, Practice, and Advocacy on Gendered Racism among Black Women Writehealing: a Sistah’s Circle Praxis to Heal and Liberate Healing through Grassroots Activism: Therapists for Protester Wellness “Black Women Saved my Life”: A Case Study on Healing Intersectional Racial Trauma Seeking Womanist-Liberation: Using Testimonios to Drive anti-Racism in Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1