生产数据分析在二语认知机制研究中的缺陷

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Second Language Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI:10.1075/jsls.21013.fuk
Junya Fukuta, Yoshito Nishimura, Yu Tamura
{"title":"生产数据分析在二语认知机制研究中的缺陷","authors":"Junya Fukuta, Yoshito Nishimura, Yu Tamura","doi":"10.1075/jsls.21013.fuk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article addresses the pitfalls of performance analysis in investigating cognitive processing during second\n language (L2) learning. The problems that we discuss in this paper are twofold: (1) Assuming psychological variables to be\n ontological entities without meeting the criteria for ontological reality and (2) Inappropriateness of assessing abilities based\n on learner’s speaking or writing performance to investigate cognitive processes. By addressing these problems, we argue that some\n latent variables postulated by observing L2 performance do not exist in reality and emphasize the difficulty of interpreting\n cognitive mechanisms through performance analysis. We also enumerate some problems that arise from the epistemological\n perspectives of previous research practice (e.g., the bifurcation of contradictory hypotheses and their indeterminacy). Finally,\n two alternative approaches treating L2 performance are proposed. The implications of this line of discussion for future research\n are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":29903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pitfalls of production data analysis for investigating L2 cognitive mechanism\",\"authors\":\"Junya Fukuta, Yoshito Nishimura, Yu Tamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jsls.21013.fuk\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article addresses the pitfalls of performance analysis in investigating cognitive processing during second\\n language (L2) learning. The problems that we discuss in this paper are twofold: (1) Assuming psychological variables to be\\n ontological entities without meeting the criteria for ontological reality and (2) Inappropriateness of assessing abilities based\\n on learner’s speaking or writing performance to investigate cognitive processes. By addressing these problems, we argue that some\\n latent variables postulated by observing L2 performance do not exist in reality and emphasize the difficulty of interpreting\\n cognitive mechanisms through performance analysis. We also enumerate some problems that arise from the epistemological\\n perspectives of previous research practice (e.g., the bifurcation of contradictory hypotheses and their indeterminacy). Finally,\\n two alternative approaches treating L2 performance are proposed. The implications of this line of discussion for future research\\n are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21013.fuk\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21013.fuk","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了绩效分析在研究第二语言学习过程中的认知加工过程中存在的缺陷。本文讨论的问题有两个:(1)假设心理变量为本体论实体而不满足本体论真实的标准;(2)基于学习者的口语或写作表现来评估能力以研究认知过程是不恰当的。通过解决这些问题,我们认为观察二语表现所假定的一些潜在变量在现实中并不存在,并强调通过表现分析来解释认知机制的难度。我们还列举了以往研究实践中从认识论角度产生的一些问题(例如,矛盾假设的分叉及其不确定性)。最后,提出了两种处理第二语言绩效的替代方法。本文还讨论了这一讨论路线对未来研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pitfalls of production data analysis for investigating L2 cognitive mechanism
This article addresses the pitfalls of performance analysis in investigating cognitive processing during second language (L2) learning. The problems that we discuss in this paper are twofold: (1) Assuming psychological variables to be ontological entities without meeting the criteria for ontological reality and (2) Inappropriateness of assessing abilities based on learner’s speaking or writing performance to investigate cognitive processes. By addressing these problems, we argue that some latent variables postulated by observing L2 performance do not exist in reality and emphasize the difficulty of interpreting cognitive mechanisms through performance analysis. We also enumerate some problems that arise from the epistemological perspectives of previous research practice (e.g., the bifurcation of contradictory hypotheses and their indeterminacy). Finally, two alternative approaches treating L2 performance are proposed. The implications of this line of discussion for future research are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
The effects of frequency, duration, and intensity on L2 learning through Duolingo The detriment that error production creates is affected by non-L1 speakers’ linguistic group membership The neural correlates of second language syntax The relationships between individual differences in working memory and language analytical ability and the effectiveness of different types of corrective feedback How can we communicate (visually) what we (usually) mean by collocation and keyness?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1