媒体和大规模枪击事件:美国有线电视新闻网对科伦拜恩高中和帕克兰高中大规模枪击事件报道的场论

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Electronic News Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.1177/19312431221111380
H. Hume, G. Perreault
{"title":"媒体和大规模枪击事件:美国有线电视新闻网对科伦拜恩高中和帕克兰高中大规模枪击事件报道的场论","authors":"H. Hume, G. Perreault","doi":"10.1177/19312431221111380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through discourse analysis, this article seeks to compare the cable news coverage of the Columbine High School shooting and the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting (n = 81) in the first two days of coverage using field theory, with CNN broadcast transcripts as the unit of analysis. The research showed that the shooter was the dominant shaping force in the CNN discourse in both school shooting events.","PeriodicalId":29929,"journal":{"name":"Electronic News","volume":"16 1","pages":"147 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Media and Mass Shootings: Field Theory in CNN News Coverage of the Columbine High School and Parkland High School Mass Shootings\",\"authors\":\"H. Hume, G. Perreault\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19312431221111380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through discourse analysis, this article seeks to compare the cable news coverage of the Columbine High School shooting and the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting (n = 81) in the first two days of coverage using field theory, with CNN broadcast transcripts as the unit of analysis. The research showed that the shooter was the dominant shaping force in the CNN discourse in both school shooting events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic News\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"147 - 163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431221111380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431221111380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图通过话语分析,运用场域理论对哥伦拜恩高中枪击案和马乔里·斯通曼·道格拉斯高中枪击案(n = 81)报道前两天的有线新闻报道进行比较,并以CNN的直播文字记录为分析单位。研究表明,在这两起校园枪击事件中,枪手都是CNN话语的主导塑造力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Media and Mass Shootings: Field Theory in CNN News Coverage of the Columbine High School and Parkland High School Mass Shootings
Through discourse analysis, this article seeks to compare the cable news coverage of the Columbine High School shooting and the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting (n = 81) in the first two days of coverage using field theory, with CNN broadcast transcripts as the unit of analysis. The research showed that the shooter was the dominant shaping force in the CNN discourse in both school shooting events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic News
Electronic News COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Does Tribe Trump Facts? Novel Measures of Hostile Media The Social Media Comment Section as an Unruly Public Arena: How Comment Reading Erodes Trust in News Media Innovation and Determination: How Local American TV Journalists Told the COVID-19 “Story of a Lifetime” “Standard” Appearance and “Accentless” Speech: How Performance Neutrality Limits Diversity in Broadcast News Attitudes of U.S. Public Broadcasters: A Liberal Helping of Interpretive Journalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1