Andra Serban , Sven Kepes , Wenhao Wang , Robert Baldwin
{"title":"认知能力与创造力:类型学贡献与元分析综述","authors":"Andra Serban , Sven Kepes , Wenhao Wang , Robert Baldwin","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the correlation between cognitive ability and creativity. Introducing an integrative typology of creativity, we assess how, at the individual level, cognitive ability at Stratum III, as well as different cognitive ability dimensions at Stratum II from Carroll's (1993) Three-Stratum Theory, correlate with three creativity perspectives (person, process, and product), and different dimensions within them. Using 135 independent samples containing 65,829 subjects, we found an observed meta-analytic correlation between cognitive ability at Stratum III and overall creativity of 0.27 (the corrected mean correlation was 0.33). The mean correlation was strongest for variables in the process perspective of creativity. We also observed that the Stratum II dimensions of cognitive ability most strongly related to creativity are broad retrieval ability and broad visual perception. In addition, we found that several conceptual and methodological moderators (e.g., cognitive ability measure, creativity measure, creativity domain, type of ratings) had a noticeable impact on the strength of the meta-analytic correlation. Dominance and sensitivity analyses tended to support our meta-analytic results. We discuss our study's contributions and practical implications and suggest future research avenues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 101757"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive ability and creativity: Typology contributions and a meta-analytic review\",\"authors\":\"Andra Serban , Sven Kepes , Wenhao Wang , Robert Baldwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Our meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the correlation between cognitive ability and creativity. Introducing an integrative typology of creativity, we assess how, at the individual level, cognitive ability at Stratum III, as well as different cognitive ability dimensions at Stratum II from Carroll's (1993) Three-Stratum Theory, correlate with three creativity perspectives (person, process, and product), and different dimensions within them. Using 135 independent samples containing 65,829 subjects, we found an observed meta-analytic correlation between cognitive ability at Stratum III and overall creativity of 0.27 (the corrected mean correlation was 0.33). The mean correlation was strongest for variables in the process perspective of creativity. We also observed that the Stratum II dimensions of cognitive ability most strongly related to creativity are broad retrieval ability and broad visual perception. In addition, we found that several conceptual and methodological moderators (e.g., cognitive ability measure, creativity measure, creativity domain, type of ratings) had a noticeable impact on the strength of the meta-analytic correlation. Dominance and sensitivity analyses tended to support our meta-analytic results. We discuss our study's contributions and practical implications and suggest future research avenues.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000387\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cognitive ability and creativity: Typology contributions and a meta-analytic review
Our meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the correlation between cognitive ability and creativity. Introducing an integrative typology of creativity, we assess how, at the individual level, cognitive ability at Stratum III, as well as different cognitive ability dimensions at Stratum II from Carroll's (1993) Three-Stratum Theory, correlate with three creativity perspectives (person, process, and product), and different dimensions within them. Using 135 independent samples containing 65,829 subjects, we found an observed meta-analytic correlation between cognitive ability at Stratum III and overall creativity of 0.27 (the corrected mean correlation was 0.33). The mean correlation was strongest for variables in the process perspective of creativity. We also observed that the Stratum II dimensions of cognitive ability most strongly related to creativity are broad retrieval ability and broad visual perception. In addition, we found that several conceptual and methodological moderators (e.g., cognitive ability measure, creativity measure, creativity domain, type of ratings) had a noticeable impact on the strength of the meta-analytic correlation. Dominance and sensitivity analyses tended to support our meta-analytic results. We discuss our study's contributions and practical implications and suggest future research avenues.
期刊介绍:
This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.