亚洲重男轻女研究可以为欧洲历史人口学研究提供哪些假设?

IF 1 3区 历史学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES History of the Family Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1080/1081602X.2022.2129417
M. Das Gupta
{"title":"亚洲重男轻女研究可以为欧洲历史人口学研究提供哪些假设?","authors":"M. Das Gupta","doi":"10.1080/1081602X.2022.2129417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT What insights can studies of son preference in Asia offer European historical demographers? Research on Asia is far easier than on historical Europe, given the scope for in-depth studies of a contemporary phenomenon instead of using available historical data. Levels of sex-selection have also been high in Asia, which makes it easier to analyze its correlates. This enables developing hypotheses that might be useful in studies of historical Europe. Studies in Asia indicate that, in rigidly patrilineal societies, son preference forms part of households’ strategy for managing their assets and risks. The extent of sex-selection varied enormously over time within a given setting, rising sharply when households faced heightened risk --- such as war, or the unwinding of Communist regimes that offered communal access to resources --- and decreasing as modern state pension systems mature. These household strategies also affect the life-chances of other household members, including marriage restriction to reduce asset fragmentation. Kinship systems shape the rights of different categories of household members and the norms of cooperation between them — including between generations, spouses, and siblings of different genders and birth orders. This paper offers some hypotheses on the implications of variations in patrilineal kinship systems in Europe for the life-chances of different categories of household members. For purposes of constructing hypotheses that can be tested if data permit, the European kinship systems are contrasted in a stylized way, as those based on a ‘lifeboat’ ethic of jettisoning non-heirs from the household, versus those based on a more ‘corporate’ ethic in which the household seeks to support all its members. Historical demographers working on Europe have rich fields to explore, given the region’s diversity: of kinship systems, of economic opportunities, and of exposure to major risks such as wars, famine, and the establishment and dis-establishment of Communism.","PeriodicalId":46118,"journal":{"name":"History of the Family","volume":"27 1","pages":"791 - 800"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What hypotheses can research on son preference in Asia offer for European historical demographic research?\",\"authors\":\"M. Das Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1081602X.2022.2129417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT What insights can studies of son preference in Asia offer European historical demographers? Research on Asia is far easier than on historical Europe, given the scope for in-depth studies of a contemporary phenomenon instead of using available historical data. Levels of sex-selection have also been high in Asia, which makes it easier to analyze its correlates. This enables developing hypotheses that might be useful in studies of historical Europe. Studies in Asia indicate that, in rigidly patrilineal societies, son preference forms part of households’ strategy for managing their assets and risks. The extent of sex-selection varied enormously over time within a given setting, rising sharply when households faced heightened risk --- such as war, or the unwinding of Communist regimes that offered communal access to resources --- and decreasing as modern state pension systems mature. These household strategies also affect the life-chances of other household members, including marriage restriction to reduce asset fragmentation. Kinship systems shape the rights of different categories of household members and the norms of cooperation between them — including between generations, spouses, and siblings of different genders and birth orders. This paper offers some hypotheses on the implications of variations in patrilineal kinship systems in Europe for the life-chances of different categories of household members. For purposes of constructing hypotheses that can be tested if data permit, the European kinship systems are contrasted in a stylized way, as those based on a ‘lifeboat’ ethic of jettisoning non-heirs from the household, versus those based on a more ‘corporate’ ethic in which the household seeks to support all its members. Historical demographers working on Europe have rich fields to explore, given the region’s diversity: of kinship systems, of economic opportunities, and of exposure to major risks such as wars, famine, and the establishment and dis-establishment of Communism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of the Family\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"791 - 800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of the Family\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2022.2129417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Family","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2022.2129417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要亚洲重男轻女研究能为欧洲历史人口学家提供哪些见解?考虑到对当代现象的深入研究而不是使用现有的历史数据,对亚洲的研究要比对历史欧洲的研究容易得多。亚洲的性别选择水平也很高,这使得分析其相关性变得更容易。这有助于发展可能对历史欧洲研究有用的假设。亚洲的研究表明,在严格的父系社会中,重男轻女是家庭管理资产和风险战略的一部分。在特定的环境中,性别选择的程度随着时间的推移变化很大,当家庭面临更高的风险时,比如战争,或者提供公共资源的共产主义政权的解体,性别选择会急剧增加,而随着现代国家养老金制度的成熟,性别选择也会减少。这些家庭策略也会影响其他家庭成员的生活机会,包括限制婚姻以减少资产碎片化。亲属制度塑造了不同类别家庭成员的权利以及他们之间的合作规范,包括不同性别和出生顺序的代际、配偶和兄弟姐妹之间的合作。本文就欧洲父系亲属制度的变化对不同类别家庭成员生活机会的影响提出了一些假设。为了构建在数据允许的情况下可以检验的假设,欧洲的亲属制度以一种程式化的方式进行了对比,即那些基于抛弃家庭非继承人的“救生艇”伦理的制度,与那些基于家庭寻求支持其所有成员的更“企业”伦理的体系。鉴于欧洲的多样性,研究欧洲的历史人口学家有丰富的领域可以探索:亲属制度、经济机会,以及面临战争、饥荒、共产主义的建立和解体等重大风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What hypotheses can research on son preference in Asia offer for European historical demographic research?
ABSTRACT What insights can studies of son preference in Asia offer European historical demographers? Research on Asia is far easier than on historical Europe, given the scope for in-depth studies of a contemporary phenomenon instead of using available historical data. Levels of sex-selection have also been high in Asia, which makes it easier to analyze its correlates. This enables developing hypotheses that might be useful in studies of historical Europe. Studies in Asia indicate that, in rigidly patrilineal societies, son preference forms part of households’ strategy for managing their assets and risks. The extent of sex-selection varied enormously over time within a given setting, rising sharply when households faced heightened risk --- such as war, or the unwinding of Communist regimes that offered communal access to resources --- and decreasing as modern state pension systems mature. These household strategies also affect the life-chances of other household members, including marriage restriction to reduce asset fragmentation. Kinship systems shape the rights of different categories of household members and the norms of cooperation between them — including between generations, spouses, and siblings of different genders and birth orders. This paper offers some hypotheses on the implications of variations in patrilineal kinship systems in Europe for the life-chances of different categories of household members. For purposes of constructing hypotheses that can be tested if data permit, the European kinship systems are contrasted in a stylized way, as those based on a ‘lifeboat’ ethic of jettisoning non-heirs from the household, versus those based on a more ‘corporate’ ethic in which the household seeks to support all its members. Historical demographers working on Europe have rich fields to explore, given the region’s diversity: of kinship systems, of economic opportunities, and of exposure to major risks such as wars, famine, and the establishment and dis-establishment of Communism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The History of the Family: An International Quarterly makes a significant contribution by publishing works reflecting new developments in scholarship and by charting new directions in the historical study of the family. Further emphasizing the international developments in historical research on the family, the Quarterly encourages articles on comparative research across various cultures and societies in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim, in addition to Europe, the United States and Canada, as well as work in the context of global history.
期刊最新文献
Trends in assortative mating in the United States, 1700-1910. Evidence from FamiLinx data. Children as pawns on the national Chess board: children in Israel’s 1948 war of Independence Dangerous liaisons, or strategies for family management in eighteenth-century Venice Varieties of egalitarianism: gender ideologies in the late socialism of the German Democratic Republic Hurricanes, fertility, and family structure: a study of early 20th century Jamaica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1