经皮锁定钢板、克氏针与外固定器治疗开放性掌骨骨折的比较研究

Ting-gang Chu, Zongwei Zhou, J. Xue, An-yuan Wang, Liang-fu Jiang, Jian Ding, Xinglong Chen, Weiyang Gao
{"title":"经皮锁定钢板、克氏针与外固定器治疗开放性掌骨骨折的比较研究","authors":"Ting-gang Chu, Zongwei Zhou, J. Xue, An-yuan Wang, Liang-fu Jiang, Jian Ding, Xinglong Chen, Weiyang Gao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-054X.2019.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the clinical efficacy of supercutaneous locking plate, Kirschner wire and external fixator in the treatment of open metacarpal fractures, and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the three different fixation methods. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom March 2015 to February 2017, 62 cases of open metacarpal fractures with poor soft tissue conditions were treated with cross Kirschner wire (group A with 23 cases), external fixator (group B with 20 cases) and supercutaneous locking plate (group C with 19 cases). The clinical effects of the three methods were analyzed from the operation time, plaster external fixation time, fracture healing time, finger joint range of motion and postoperative complications. \n \n \nResults \nAll the three groups were follow-up for 8 to 26 months with an average of 10.6 months. The mean operation time was (25.6±2.6) minutes in group A, (42.3±3.4) minutes in group B and (43.1±4.3) minutes in group C. The mean plaster external fixation time was (5.1±1.0) weeks in group A, (3.6±0.6) weeks in group B and (1.8±0.4) weeks in group C. The mean fracture healing time was (8.5±1.0) weeks in group A, (8.2±0.9) weeks in group B and (6.1±0.7) weeks in group C. The excellent and good rates of finger joint range of motion at 4 and 24 weeks after the operation were 34.8% and 73.9% in group A, 40.0% and 80.0% in group B and 89.5% and 94.7% in group C respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications was 34.8% in group A, 25.0% in group B and 5.3% in group C, respectively. Except the operation time of group C was longer than that of group A and group B, the other indexes were better. Except for the excellent and good rate of finger joint range of motion at 24 weeks after the operation, the other differences had statistical significance (P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nFor the open metacarpal fractures with severe contamination or soft tissue injuries, the supercutaneous locking plate fixation can achieve better clinical results than cross Kirschner wire and external fixator. \n \n \nKey words: \nMetacarpal bones; Fractures,bone; Kirschner wire; External fixator; Locking plate","PeriodicalId":67383,"journal":{"name":"中华手外科杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"321-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of supercutaneous locking plate, Kirschner wire and external fixator in the treatment of open metacarpal fractures\",\"authors\":\"Ting-gang Chu, Zongwei Zhou, J. Xue, An-yuan Wang, Liang-fu Jiang, Jian Ding, Xinglong Chen, Weiyang Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-054X.2019.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the clinical efficacy of supercutaneous locking plate, Kirschner wire and external fixator in the treatment of open metacarpal fractures, and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the three different fixation methods. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom March 2015 to February 2017, 62 cases of open metacarpal fractures with poor soft tissue conditions were treated with cross Kirschner wire (group A with 23 cases), external fixator (group B with 20 cases) and supercutaneous locking plate (group C with 19 cases). The clinical effects of the three methods were analyzed from the operation time, plaster external fixation time, fracture healing time, finger joint range of motion and postoperative complications. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAll the three groups were follow-up for 8 to 26 months with an average of 10.6 months. The mean operation time was (25.6±2.6) minutes in group A, (42.3±3.4) minutes in group B and (43.1±4.3) minutes in group C. The mean plaster external fixation time was (5.1±1.0) weeks in group A, (3.6±0.6) weeks in group B and (1.8±0.4) weeks in group C. The mean fracture healing time was (8.5±1.0) weeks in group A, (8.2±0.9) weeks in group B and (6.1±0.7) weeks in group C. The excellent and good rates of finger joint range of motion at 4 and 24 weeks after the operation were 34.8% and 73.9% in group A, 40.0% and 80.0% in group B and 89.5% and 94.7% in group C respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications was 34.8% in group A, 25.0% in group B and 5.3% in group C, respectively. Except the operation time of group C was longer than that of group A and group B, the other indexes were better. Except for the excellent and good rate of finger joint range of motion at 24 weeks after the operation, the other differences had statistical significance (P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nFor the open metacarpal fractures with severe contamination or soft tissue injuries, the supercutaneous locking plate fixation can achieve better clinical results than cross Kirschner wire and external fixator. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nMetacarpal bones; Fractures,bone; Kirschner wire; External fixator; Locking plate\",\"PeriodicalId\":67383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华手外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"321-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华手外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-054X.2019.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华手外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-054X.2019.05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较经皮锁定钢板、克氏针和外固定架治疗开放性掌骨骨折的临床疗效,并分析三种不同固定方法的优缺点。方法2015年3月~ 2017年2月,对62例软组织条件较差的开放性掌骨骨折采用交叉克氏针(A组23例)、外固定架(B组20例)、皮外锁定钢板(C组19例)治疗。从手术时间、石膏外固定时间、骨折愈合时间、手指关节活动范围及术后并发症等方面分析三种方法的临床效果。结果三组患者均随访8 ~ 26个月,平均10.6个月。A组平均手术时间为(25.6±2.6)分钟,B组为(42.3±3.4)分钟,c组为(43.1±4.3)分钟。A组平均石膏外固定时间为(5.1±1.0)周,B组为(3.6±0.6)周,c组为(1.8±0.4)周。A组平均骨折愈合时间为(8.5±1.0)周。B组为(8.2±0.9)周,C组为(6.1±0.7)周。术后4周、24周手指关节活动范围优良率A组为34.8%、73.9%,B组为40.0%、80.0%,C组为89.5%、94.7%。A组术后并发症发生率为34.8%,B组为25.0%,C组为5.3%。除C组手术时间较A、B组长外,其他指标均优于A、B组。除术后24周手指关节活动范围优良率外,其他差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于严重污染或软组织损伤的开放性掌骨骨折,经皮锁定钢板内固定比交叉克氏针外固定架能取得更好的临床效果。关键词:掌骨;骨折,骨;柯式线;外固定器;锁定板
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of supercutaneous locking plate, Kirschner wire and external fixator in the treatment of open metacarpal fractures
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of supercutaneous locking plate, Kirschner wire and external fixator in the treatment of open metacarpal fractures, and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the three different fixation methods. Methods From March 2015 to February 2017, 62 cases of open metacarpal fractures with poor soft tissue conditions were treated with cross Kirschner wire (group A with 23 cases), external fixator (group B with 20 cases) and supercutaneous locking plate (group C with 19 cases). The clinical effects of the three methods were analyzed from the operation time, plaster external fixation time, fracture healing time, finger joint range of motion and postoperative complications. Results All the three groups were follow-up for 8 to 26 months with an average of 10.6 months. The mean operation time was (25.6±2.6) minutes in group A, (42.3±3.4) minutes in group B and (43.1±4.3) minutes in group C. The mean plaster external fixation time was (5.1±1.0) weeks in group A, (3.6±0.6) weeks in group B and (1.8±0.4) weeks in group C. The mean fracture healing time was (8.5±1.0) weeks in group A, (8.2±0.9) weeks in group B and (6.1±0.7) weeks in group C. The excellent and good rates of finger joint range of motion at 4 and 24 weeks after the operation were 34.8% and 73.9% in group A, 40.0% and 80.0% in group B and 89.5% and 94.7% in group C respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications was 34.8% in group A, 25.0% in group B and 5.3% in group C, respectively. Except the operation time of group C was longer than that of group A and group B, the other indexes were better. Except for the excellent and good rate of finger joint range of motion at 24 weeks after the operation, the other differences had statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion For the open metacarpal fractures with severe contamination or soft tissue injuries, the supercutaneous locking plate fixation can achieve better clinical results than cross Kirschner wire and external fixator. Key words: Metacarpal bones; Fractures,bone; Kirschner wire; External fixator; Locking plate
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4937
期刊最新文献
Microsurgical replantation of retrograde avulsion injury of finger skin Management of intra-articular metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with external fixators Early and mid-term electrophysiological study of the contralateral C7 nerve transfer using the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve as a bridge to the deep branch of ulnar nerve Application of joint debridement for distal interphalangeal joint mucocele Clinical efficacy analysis of trans-articular plate combined with Kirschner wire for treatment of the fifth carpometacarpal joint fracture and dislocation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1