评估新冠肺炎政策措施,以保护居住在长期护理设施中的欧洲老年人

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Global Social Policy Pub Date : 2021-05-23 DOI:10.1177/14680181211013717
L. Frisina Doetter, Benedikt Preuß, H. Rothgang
{"title":"评估新冠肺炎政策措施,以保护居住在长期护理设施中的欧洲老年人","authors":"L. Frisina Doetter, Benedikt Preuß, H. Rothgang","doi":"10.1177/14680181211013717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current COVID-19 pandemic has come to impact all areas of life involving the health, psycho-social and economic wellbeing of individuals, as well as all stages of life from childhood to old age. Particularly, the frail elderly have had to face the gravest consequences of the disease; while reporting measures tend to differ between countries making direct comparisons difficult, national statistics worldwide point to a disproportionate and staggering share of COVID-19 related mortality coming from residential long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Still, the severity of the impact on the institutionalized elderly has not been uniform across countries. In an effort to better understand the disparities in impact on Europe’s elderly living in LTCFs, we review data on mortality outcomes seen during the first wave of the pandemic (months March to June 2020). We then set out to understand the role played by the following two factors: (1) the infection rate in the general population and (2) member state adherence to policy recommendations put forth by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) targeting the LTC sector. Regarding the latter, we compare the content of national policy measures in six countries – Austria, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Spain and Sweden – with those of the ECDC. Our findings establish that infection rates in the general population accounted for most of the variation in mortality among member states, however adherence to EU policy helped to explain the residual variation between cases. This suggests that in order to best protect the institutionalized elderly from infectious disease of this kind, countries need to adopt a two-pronged approach to developing measures: one that aims at reducing transmission within the general population and one that specifically targets LTCFs.","PeriodicalId":46041,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"146801812110137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14680181211013717","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking stock of COVID-19 policy measures to protect Europe’s elderly living in long-term care facilities\",\"authors\":\"L. Frisina Doetter, Benedikt Preuß, H. Rothgang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14680181211013717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current COVID-19 pandemic has come to impact all areas of life involving the health, psycho-social and economic wellbeing of individuals, as well as all stages of life from childhood to old age. Particularly, the frail elderly have had to face the gravest consequences of the disease; while reporting measures tend to differ between countries making direct comparisons difficult, national statistics worldwide point to a disproportionate and staggering share of COVID-19 related mortality coming from residential long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Still, the severity of the impact on the institutionalized elderly has not been uniform across countries. In an effort to better understand the disparities in impact on Europe’s elderly living in LTCFs, we review data on mortality outcomes seen during the first wave of the pandemic (months March to June 2020). We then set out to understand the role played by the following two factors: (1) the infection rate in the general population and (2) member state adherence to policy recommendations put forth by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) targeting the LTC sector. Regarding the latter, we compare the content of national policy measures in six countries – Austria, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Spain and Sweden – with those of the ECDC. Our findings establish that infection rates in the general population accounted for most of the variation in mortality among member states, however adherence to EU policy helped to explain the residual variation between cases. This suggests that in order to best protect the institutionalized elderly from infectious disease of this kind, countries need to adopt a two-pronged approach to developing measures: one that aims at reducing transmission within the general population and one that specifically targets LTCFs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Social Policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"146801812110137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14680181211013717\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181211013717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181211013717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

当前的新冠肺炎大流行已经影响到生活的所有领域,包括个人的健康、心理社会和经济福祉,以及从儿童到老年的所有阶段。特别是体弱的老年人不得不面对这种疾病的最严重后果;尽管各国的报告措施往往不同,难以进行直接比较,但世界各地的国家统计数据表明,新冠肺炎相关死亡率中,居住长期护理机构(LTCF)所占比例不成比例,令人震惊。尽管如此,对被收容的老年人影响的严重程度在各国并不一致。为了更好地了解LTCF对欧洲老年人影响的差异,我们审查了第一波疫情期间(2020年3月至6月)的死亡率数据。然后,我们开始了解以下两个因素所起的作用:(1)普通人群的感染率;(2)成员国遵守欧洲疾病预防和控制中心(ECDC)针对LTC部门提出的政策建议。关于后者,我们将奥地利、丹麦、德国、爱尔兰、西班牙和瑞典这六个国家的国家政策措施的内容与经合组织的内容进行了比较。我们的研究结果表明,普通人群的感染率是成员国死亡率变化的主要原因,但遵守欧盟政策有助于解释病例之间的残余差异。这表明,为了最好地保护被收容的老年人免受此类传染病的侵害,各国需要采取双管齐下的方法来制定措施:一种旨在减少普通人群中的传播,另一种专门针对LTCF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taking stock of COVID-19 policy measures to protect Europe’s elderly living in long-term care facilities
The current COVID-19 pandemic has come to impact all areas of life involving the health, psycho-social and economic wellbeing of individuals, as well as all stages of life from childhood to old age. Particularly, the frail elderly have had to face the gravest consequences of the disease; while reporting measures tend to differ between countries making direct comparisons difficult, national statistics worldwide point to a disproportionate and staggering share of COVID-19 related mortality coming from residential long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Still, the severity of the impact on the institutionalized elderly has not been uniform across countries. In an effort to better understand the disparities in impact on Europe’s elderly living in LTCFs, we review data on mortality outcomes seen during the first wave of the pandemic (months March to June 2020). We then set out to understand the role played by the following two factors: (1) the infection rate in the general population and (2) member state adherence to policy recommendations put forth by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) targeting the LTC sector. Regarding the latter, we compare the content of national policy measures in six countries – Austria, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Spain and Sweden – with those of the ECDC. Our findings establish that infection rates in the general population accounted for most of the variation in mortality among member states, however adherence to EU policy helped to explain the residual variation between cases. This suggests that in order to best protect the institutionalized elderly from infectious disease of this kind, countries need to adopt a two-pronged approach to developing measures: one that aims at reducing transmission within the general population and one that specifically targets LTCFs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Social Policy
Global Social Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Global Social Policy is a fully peer-reviewed journal that advances the understanding of the impact of globalisation processes upon social policy and social development on the one hand, and the impact of social policy upon globalisation processes on the other hand. The journal analyses the contributions of a range of national and international actors, both governmental and non-governmental, to global social policy and social development discourse and practice. Global Social Policy publishes scholarly policy-oriented articles and reports that focus on aspects of social policy and social and human development as broadly defined in the context of globalisation be it in contemporary or historical contexts.
期刊最新文献
Social sustainability in the decarbonized welfare state: Social policy as a buffer against poverty related to environmental taxes When growth is not enough: Do government transfers moderate the effect of economic growth on absolute and relative child poverty? Social policy as knowledge process: How its sociotechnical links to labour reconfigure the social question An eco-social policy typology: From system reproduction to transformation Reflexivity in global social policy: Introduction to the special issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1