选定农业产业的基准维护绩效

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Pub Date : 2020-12-22 DOI:10.1108/jqme-02-2019-0018
B. Gandhare, M. Akarte
{"title":"选定农业产业的基准维护绩效","authors":"B. Gandhare, M. Akarte","doi":"10.1108/jqme-02-2019-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper demonstrates a multi-criteria analytic hierarchy process (AHP) framework for evaluating and benchmarking maintenance performance in the select agro-based industry.Design/methodology/approachInitially, 20 maintenance practices (criteria) have been identified after a detailed literature review and discussion with the agro-based industry (sugar, textile and dairy industry) executives. These are then grouped into six maintenance management areas referred to as group criteria. The multi-criteria methodology consists of three steps: criteria identification, hierarchical modeling and data collection and maintenance performance evaluation, and benchmarking. The multi-criteria methodology proposed in this work facilitates two ways of carrying out benchmarking: (1) within the agro-based industry and (2) between the agro-based industry. The methodology has been explained by taking a case example of 45 agro-based industries (18 dairy, 13 sugar and 14 textile) from the western region of India. The sensitivity analysis of the model has been performed to ascertain the robustness of the results.FindingsThere is a difference in the maintenance performance across the agro-based industries due to different maintenance practices perceived differently.Research limitations/implicationsThe outcome of the model is mainly given by the judgments of the agro-based industry executives. It is also sensitive to any change in the relative importance to the evaluation criteria or the perception about the maintenance performance.Practical implicationsThe study contributes in identifying the weakness, if any, by comparing the agro-based industry under investigation with the benchmark factory at three levels, namely, overall performance (factory level), group criteria (maintenance management area level) and criteria (maintenance practice level) allowing further improvement.Originality/valueThe methodology assists in better decision-making and in improving maintenance performance.","PeriodicalId":16938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking maintenance performance in select agro-based industry\",\"authors\":\"B. Gandhare, M. Akarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jqme-02-2019-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper demonstrates a multi-criteria analytic hierarchy process (AHP) framework for evaluating and benchmarking maintenance performance in the select agro-based industry.Design/methodology/approachInitially, 20 maintenance practices (criteria) have been identified after a detailed literature review and discussion with the agro-based industry (sugar, textile and dairy industry) executives. These are then grouped into six maintenance management areas referred to as group criteria. The multi-criteria methodology consists of three steps: criteria identification, hierarchical modeling and data collection and maintenance performance evaluation, and benchmarking. The multi-criteria methodology proposed in this work facilitates two ways of carrying out benchmarking: (1) within the agro-based industry and (2) between the agro-based industry. The methodology has been explained by taking a case example of 45 agro-based industries (18 dairy, 13 sugar and 14 textile) from the western region of India. The sensitivity analysis of the model has been performed to ascertain the robustness of the results.FindingsThere is a difference in the maintenance performance across the agro-based industries due to different maintenance practices perceived differently.Research limitations/implicationsThe outcome of the model is mainly given by the judgments of the agro-based industry executives. It is also sensitive to any change in the relative importance to the evaluation criteria or the perception about the maintenance performance.Practical implicationsThe study contributes in identifying the weakness, if any, by comparing the agro-based industry under investigation with the benchmark factory at three levels, namely, overall performance (factory level), group criteria (maintenance management area level) and criteria (maintenance practice level) allowing further improvement.Originality/valueThe methodology assists in better decision-making and in improving maintenance performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jqme-02-2019-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jqme-02-2019-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的本文展示了一个多标准层次分析法(AHP)框架,用于评估和基准测试选定的农业产业的维护绩效。设计/方法/方法最初,在详细的文献审查和与农业(糖、纺织和乳制品行业)高管的讨论后,确定了20种维护实践(标准)。然后将其分为六个维护管理区域,称为组标准。多标准方法由三个步骤组成:标准识别、分层建模和数据收集、维护性能评估以及基准测试。本工作中提出的多标准方法有助于两种方式进行基准测试:(1)在农产工业内部和(2)在农产业之间。该方法以印度西部地区的45个农业产业(18个乳制品、13个制糖和14个纺织)为例进行了解释。对模型进行了灵敏度分析,以确定结果的稳健性。发现由于不同的维护实践,不同的农业行业的维护绩效存在差异。研究局限性/含义模型的结果主要由农业行业高管的判断给出。它对评估标准的相对重要性或对维护性能的感知的任何变化也很敏感。实际含义该研究通过在三个层面上比较所调查的农业工业与基准工厂,即总体绩效(工厂层面)、小组标准(维护管理领域层面)和允许进一步改进的标准(维护实践层面),有助于识别弱点(如果有的话)。独创性/价值该方法有助于更好的决策和提高维护性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarking maintenance performance in select agro-based industry
PurposeThis paper demonstrates a multi-criteria analytic hierarchy process (AHP) framework for evaluating and benchmarking maintenance performance in the select agro-based industry.Design/methodology/approachInitially, 20 maintenance practices (criteria) have been identified after a detailed literature review and discussion with the agro-based industry (sugar, textile and dairy industry) executives. These are then grouped into six maintenance management areas referred to as group criteria. The multi-criteria methodology consists of three steps: criteria identification, hierarchical modeling and data collection and maintenance performance evaluation, and benchmarking. The multi-criteria methodology proposed in this work facilitates two ways of carrying out benchmarking: (1) within the agro-based industry and (2) between the agro-based industry. The methodology has been explained by taking a case example of 45 agro-based industries (18 dairy, 13 sugar and 14 textile) from the western region of India. The sensitivity analysis of the model has been performed to ascertain the robustness of the results.FindingsThere is a difference in the maintenance performance across the agro-based industries due to different maintenance practices perceived differently.Research limitations/implicationsThe outcome of the model is mainly given by the judgments of the agro-based industry executives. It is also sensitive to any change in the relative importance to the evaluation criteria or the perception about the maintenance performance.Practical implicationsThe study contributes in identifying the weakness, if any, by comparing the agro-based industry under investigation with the benchmark factory at three levels, namely, overall performance (factory level), group criteria (maintenance management area level) and criteria (maintenance practice level) allowing further improvement.Originality/valueThe methodology assists in better decision-making and in improving maintenance performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: This exciting journal looks at maintenance engineering from a positive standpoint, and clarifies its recently elevatedstatus as a highly technical, scientific, and complex field. Typical areas examined include: ■Budget and control ■Equipment management ■Maintenance information systems ■Process capability and maintenance ■Process monitoring techniques ■Reliability-based maintenance ■Replacement and life cycle costs ■TQM and maintenance
期刊最新文献
Spare parts management in industry 4.0 era: a literature review Data-driven decision-making in maintenance management and coordination throughout the asset life cycle: an empirical study Joint maintenance planning and production scheduling optimization model for green environment Identification of optimal maintenance parameters for best maintenance and service management system in the SMEs Modeling and solving the multi-objective energy-efficient production planning and scheduling with imperfect maintenance activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1