《金瓶梅》的满语阅读：18世纪初的评点、百科全书与翻译实践

IF 0.6 2区历史学 Q1 HISTORY LATE IMPERIAL CHINA Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI:10.1353/late.2021.0005

Nathan Vedal

{"title":"《金瓶梅》的满语阅读：18世纪初的评点、百科全书与翻译实践","authors":"Nathan Vedal","doi":"10.1353/late.2021.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the notorious, but little-studied Manchu translation of Jinpingmei. I argue that the translation embraces multiple levels of translingual literacy, embodied in the philological reading aids provided throughout the text. The forms of commentary contained within require a reconsideration of Manchu reading practices and allow for a comparison with approaches to Sinitic writing and vernacular reading across early modern East Asia.","PeriodicalId":43948,"journal":{"name":"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA","volume":"42 1","pages":"1 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Manchu Reading of Jinpingmei: Commentary, Encyclopedism, and Translingual Practices in Early Eighteenth-Century China\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Vedal\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/late.2021.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines the notorious, but little-studied Manchu translation of Jinpingmei. I argue that the translation embraces multiple levels of translingual literacy, embodied in the philological reading aids provided throughout the text. The forms of commentary contained within require a reconsideration of Manchu reading practices and allow for a comparison with approaches to Sinitic writing and vernacular reading across early modern East Asia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/late.2021.0005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/late.2021.0005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要：本文对《金瓶梅》的满语翻译进行了研究。我认为，翻译包含了多个层面的跨语言素养，体现在整个文本中提供的语文阅读辅助工具中。其中包含的评论形式需要重新考虑满族的阅读实践，并允许与现代东亚早期的汉化写作和白话文阅读方法进行比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The Manchu Reading of Jinpingmei: Commentary, Encyclopedism, and Translingual Practices in Early Eighteenth-Century China

Abstract:This article examines the notorious, but little-studied Manchu translation of Jinpingmei. I argue that the translation embraces multiple levels of translingual literacy, embodied in the philological reading aids provided throughout the text. The forms of commentary contained within require a reconsideration of Manchu reading practices and allow for a comparison with approaches to Sinitic writing and vernacular reading across early modern East Asia.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊