气候变率和收获后粮食损失减少技术:来自坦桑尼亚农村的证据。

IF 0.9 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Studies in Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI:10.22004/AG.ECON.287548
S. Ndiritu, R. Ruhinduka
{"title":"气候变率和收获后粮食损失减少技术:来自坦桑尼亚农村的证据。","authors":"S. Ndiritu, R. Ruhinduka","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.287548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on improved storage and preservation technologies as an adaptation strategy in response to climate change. We also study the trade-off between improved cereal storage technologies and the preservation techniques among rural households in Tanzania. We find that climate variables significantly influence farmers’ choice of improved storage technologies and preserving decisions. Using a bivariate probit model, we find that modern storage technologies and preservation measures are substitutes. Farmers can significantly reduce annual costs associated with preservation by adopting (usually long lasting) modern storage facilities.","PeriodicalId":44547,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate variability and post-harvest food loss abatement technologies: evidence from rural Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"S. Ndiritu, R. Ruhinduka\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.287548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on improved storage and preservation technologies as an adaptation strategy in response to climate change. We also study the trade-off between improved cereal storage technologies and the preservation techniques among rural households in Tanzania. We find that climate variables significantly influence farmers’ choice of improved storage technologies and preserving decisions. Using a bivariate probit model, we find that modern storage technologies and preservation measures are substitutes. Farmers can significantly reduce annual costs associated with preservation by adopting (usually long lasting) modern storage facilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.287548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.287548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文重点研究了改进储存和保存技术作为应对气候变化的适应策略。我们还研究了坦桑尼亚农村家庭改良谷物储存技术和保存技术之间的权衡。我们发现气候变量显著影响农民对改良储存技术的选择和保存决策。利用二元概率模型,我们发现现代储存技术和保存措施是替代的。农民可以通过采用(通常是持久的)现代储存设施大大减少与保存相关的年度成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Climate variability and post-harvest food loss abatement technologies: evidence from rural Tanzania.
This paper focuses on improved storage and preservation technologies as an adaptation strategy in response to climate change. We also study the trade-off between improved cereal storage technologies and the preservation techniques among rural households in Tanzania. We find that climate variables significantly influence farmers’ choice of improved storage technologies and preserving decisions. Using a bivariate probit model, we find that modern storage technologies and preservation measures are substitutes. Farmers can significantly reduce annual costs associated with preservation by adopting (usually long lasting) modern storage facilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Agricultural Economics
Studies in Agricultural Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Facilitating PLF Technology Adoption in the Pig and Poultry Industries Comparing the impacts of economic uncertainty, climate change, Covid-19, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict: Which is the most dangerous for EU27 food prices? Assessing the sectoral and cross-sectoral impacts of new European Union broiler chicken welfare measures in Hungary as proposed by the European Food Safety Authority Suckler-cow and sheep farming in global comparison – production systems and economics The profitability of site-specific fertilisation based on Sure Grow Solutions – A Canadian case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1