新冠肺炎大流行期间公众对远程医疗应用的接受度评估

Muhammad Reza Velayani, M. Nuruzzaman, Agung Fatwanto, Bambang Sugiantoro
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间公众对远程医疗应用的接受度评估","authors":"Muhammad Reza Velayani, M. Nuruzzaman, Agung Fatwanto, Bambang Sugiantoro","doi":"10.14421/jiska.2023.8.2.140-153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telemedicine is a technology that provides benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been going on for more than two years. However, we have never conducted an evaluation or assessment of Telemedicine applications. In this study, we tried to look at people's acceptance of using the application, and 104 participants became respondents. This study uses the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) method, which this method measures the influence between variables. TAM has five indicator variables: Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Attitude Toward Using, Behavioral Intention, and Actual Usage. In this study, four models were made with three comparison models; then, for the results of testing the relationship between variables, three hypotheses are always accepted in each model, namely Perceived Ease of Use with Perceived Usefulness, Perception Ease of Use with Attitude Toward Using, and Behavioral Intention with Actual Usage. Then the two hypotheses always rejected in each model are Perceived Usefulness with Attitude Toward Using, Attitude Toward Using with Behavioral Intention. Then there is one hypothesis for each model that is refused, namely Perceived Usefulness with Behavioral Intention, Perceived Usefulness with Actual Usage, Perceived Ease of Use with Behavioral Intention, and Perceived Ease of Use with Actual Usage.","PeriodicalId":34216,"journal":{"name":"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluasi Penerimaan Masyarakat Terhadap Aplikasi Telemedicine pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Reza Velayani, M. Nuruzzaman, Agung Fatwanto, Bambang Sugiantoro\",\"doi\":\"10.14421/jiska.2023.8.2.140-153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Telemedicine is a technology that provides benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been going on for more than two years. However, we have never conducted an evaluation or assessment of Telemedicine applications. In this study, we tried to look at people's acceptance of using the application, and 104 participants became respondents. This study uses the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) method, which this method measures the influence between variables. TAM has five indicator variables: Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Attitude Toward Using, Behavioral Intention, and Actual Usage. In this study, four models were made with three comparison models; then, for the results of testing the relationship between variables, three hypotheses are always accepted in each model, namely Perceived Ease of Use with Perceived Usefulness, Perception Ease of Use with Attitude Toward Using, and Behavioral Intention with Actual Usage. Then the two hypotheses always rejected in each model are Perceived Usefulness with Attitude Toward Using, Attitude Toward Using with Behavioral Intention. Then there is one hypothesis for each model that is refused, namely Perceived Usefulness with Behavioral Intention, Perceived Usefulness with Actual Usage, Perceived Ease of Use with Behavioral Intention, and Perceived Ease of Use with Actual Usage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14421/jiska.2023.8.2.140-153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/jiska.2023.8.2.140-153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

远程医疗是在持续两年多的COVID-19大流行期间提供益处的技术。然而,我们从未对远程医疗的应用进行评估或评估。在这项研究中,我们试图了解人们对使用应用程序的接受程度,104名参与者成为了受访者。本研究采用TAM (Technology Acceptance Model)方法,该方法衡量变量之间的影响。TAM有五个指标变量:感知易用性、感知有用性、使用态度、行为意图和实际使用。本研究共制作了4个模型和3个比较模型;然后,对于变量之间关系的检验结果,每个模型都接受三个假设,即感知易用性与感知有用性、感知易用性与使用态度、行为意图与实际使用。每个模型都拒绝的两个假设是感知有用性与使用态度、使用态度与行为意图。然后每个模型都有一个假设被拒绝,即行为意图感知有用性、实际使用感知有用性、行为意图感知易用性和实际使用感知易用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluasi Penerimaan Masyarakat Terhadap Aplikasi Telemedicine pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19
Telemedicine is a technology that provides benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been going on for more than two years. However, we have never conducted an evaluation or assessment of Telemedicine applications. In this study, we tried to look at people's acceptance of using the application, and 104 participants became respondents. This study uses the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) method, which this method measures the influence between variables. TAM has five indicator variables: Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Attitude Toward Using, Behavioral Intention, and Actual Usage. In this study, four models were made with three comparison models; then, for the results of testing the relationship between variables, three hypotheses are always accepted in each model, namely Perceived Ease of Use with Perceived Usefulness, Perception Ease of Use with Attitude Toward Using, and Behavioral Intention with Actual Usage. Then the two hypotheses always rejected in each model are Perceived Usefulness with Attitude Toward Using, Attitude Toward Using with Behavioral Intention. Then there is one hypothesis for each model that is refused, namely Perceived Usefulness with Behavioral Intention, Perceived Usefulness with Actual Usage, Perceived Ease of Use with Behavioral Intention, and Perceived Ease of Use with Actual Usage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pemodelan Proses Bisnis Kuliah Online MOOCs menggunakan BPMN (Studi Kasus alison.com) Analisis Bibliometrik Publikasi Isu Kebocoran Data Menggunakan VOSviewer Klasifikasi Sentimen Masyarakat Terhadap Proses Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara (IKN) Indonesia pada Media Sosial Twitter Menggunakan Metode Naïve Bayes Klasifikasi Tingkat Kerusakan Sektor Pasca Bencana Alam Menggunakan Metode MULTIMOORA Berbasis Web Pembuatan Ergonomic Mechanical Keyboard untuk Mengurangi Cidera Tangan Menggunakan Teknologi Arduino
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1