专家产品评论的一致性:葡萄酒指南的应用

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Wine Economics and Policy Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI:10.36253/wep-12400
G. Penagos-Londoño, Felipe Ruiz-Moreno, Ricardo Sellers-Rubio, Salvador Del Barrio-García, A. B. Casado-Díaz
{"title":"专家产品评论的一致性:葡萄酒指南的应用","authors":"G. Penagos-Londoño, Felipe Ruiz-Moreno, Ricardo Sellers-Rubio, Salvador Del Barrio-García, A. B. Casado-Díaz","doi":"10.36253/wep-12400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose of this study is to examine the internal consistency of wine guides by comparing the judgements of expert wine tasters and reviewers. A classification of wines is provided to establish whether expert reviews of similar wines are coherent. Design/methodology/approach. Sentiment analysis based on natural language processing techniques was used to compare quantitative and qualitative reviews between experts. In addition, a finite mixture model was used to classify wines into categories to analyse internal consistency between ratings. Findings. The results for a sample of more than 200,000 Wine Enthusiast ratings reveal significant differences between expert reviews. This finding indicates that there are no standard criteria for reviewing wines included in the guide. Originality. Wine guides are amongst the most widely used marketing resources in the wine industry. They provide a signal to consumers about the quality of wines, guiding their purchase decisions. They also influence the reputation of brands and the performance of companies producing these wines. The main contribution of this study is to propose a new way to compare the reviews of wine guide experts.","PeriodicalId":38081,"journal":{"name":"Wine Economics and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency of expert product reviews: an application to wine guides\",\"authors\":\"G. Penagos-Londoño, Felipe Ruiz-Moreno, Ricardo Sellers-Rubio, Salvador Del Barrio-García, A. B. Casado-Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.36253/wep-12400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. The purpose of this study is to examine the internal consistency of wine guides by comparing the judgements of expert wine tasters and reviewers. A classification of wines is provided to establish whether expert reviews of similar wines are coherent. Design/methodology/approach. Sentiment analysis based on natural language processing techniques was used to compare quantitative and qualitative reviews between experts. In addition, a finite mixture model was used to classify wines into categories to analyse internal consistency between ratings. Findings. The results for a sample of more than 200,000 Wine Enthusiast ratings reveal significant differences between expert reviews. This finding indicates that there are no standard criteria for reviewing wines included in the guide. Originality. Wine guides are amongst the most widely used marketing resources in the wine industry. They provide a signal to consumers about the quality of wines, guiding their purchase decisions. They also influence the reputation of brands and the performance of companies producing these wines. The main contribution of this study is to propose a new way to compare the reviews of wine guide experts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wine Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wine Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-12400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wine Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-12400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。本研究的目的是通过比较专家品酒师和评论家的判断来检验葡萄酒指南的内部一致性。提供了葡萄酒的分类,以确定是否专家评论相似的葡萄酒是连贯的。设计/方法/方法。基于自然语言处理技术的情感分析用于比较专家之间的定量和定性评论。此外,采用有限混合模型对葡萄酒进行分类,以分析评级之间的内部一致性。发现。对20多万份《葡萄酒爱好者》(Wine Enthusiast)评级样本的调查结果显示,专家评论之间存在显著差异。这一发现表明,没有标准的标准,审查葡萄酒包括在指南。创意。葡萄酒指南是葡萄酒行业最广泛使用的营销资源之一。它们向消费者提供了关于葡萄酒质量的信号,指导他们的购买决策。它们还会影响品牌的声誉和生产这些葡萄酒的公司的业绩。本研究的主要贡献是提出了一种比较葡萄酒指南专家评论的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consistency of expert product reviews: an application to wine guides
Purpose. The purpose of this study is to examine the internal consistency of wine guides by comparing the judgements of expert wine tasters and reviewers. A classification of wines is provided to establish whether expert reviews of similar wines are coherent. Design/methodology/approach. Sentiment analysis based on natural language processing techniques was used to compare quantitative and qualitative reviews between experts. In addition, a finite mixture model was used to classify wines into categories to analyse internal consistency between ratings. Findings. The results for a sample of more than 200,000 Wine Enthusiast ratings reveal significant differences between expert reviews. This finding indicates that there are no standard criteria for reviewing wines included in the guide. Originality. Wine guides are amongst the most widely used marketing resources in the wine industry. They provide a signal to consumers about the quality of wines, guiding their purchase decisions. They also influence the reputation of brands and the performance of companies producing these wines. The main contribution of this study is to propose a new way to compare the reviews of wine guide experts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wine Economics and Policy
Wine Economics and Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current Evidence for the Management of Edentulous Atrophic Mandible Fractures: A PRISMA-SWiM Guided Review. State of the International Wine Markets in 2022: New market trends for wines require new strategies Does anyone read my papers? The gap between academic consumer research and the real (wine) world The Impact of Alternative Packaging on the Life Cycle of Wine on Tap The impact of fees on customer purchasing behavior and beliefs in winery tasting rooms: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1