表面上的敌意:美洲法院严重侵犯人权的概念与刑罚权之间的紧张关系

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Derecho PUCP Pub Date : 2020-05-29 DOI:10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008
Adrián Lengua Parra, Victor Emilio Ostolaza Seminario
{"title":"表面上的敌意:美洲法院严重侵犯人权的概念与刑罚权之间的紧张关系","authors":"Adrián Lengua Parra, Victor Emilio Ostolaza Seminario","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the judgment of the Barrios Altos case vs. Peru, the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights began to develop the concept of «serious violations of rights» and their consequences in the national criminal sphere. Despite being a consolidated standard, nowadays there are still doubts about what acts should be classified under such legal category and if it is correct to limit certain procedural and criminal guarantees in order to achieve their criminalization. This paper explains these controversies in order to propose a legal solution that avoids impunity and ensures the legitimacy of the legal system.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enemistad aparente: la tensión entre el concepto de graves violaciones de derechos humanos de la Corte Interamericana con el derecho pena\",\"authors\":\"Adrián Lengua Parra, Victor Emilio Ostolaza Seminario\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From the judgment of the Barrios Altos case vs. Peru, the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights began to develop the concept of «serious violations of rights» and their consequences in the national criminal sphere. Despite being a consolidated standard, nowadays there are still doubts about what acts should be classified under such legal category and if it is correct to limit certain procedural and criminal guarantees in order to achieve their criminalization. This paper explains these controversies in order to propose a legal solution that avoids impunity and ensures the legitimacy of the legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Derecho PUCP\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Derecho PUCP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho PUCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

从巴里奥斯·阿尔托斯诉秘鲁案的判决开始,美洲人权法院开始发展“严重侵犯权利”的概念及其在国家刑事领域的后果。尽管这是一个统一的标准,但目前仍有人怀疑哪些行为应被归类为这一法律类别,以及限制某些程序和刑事保障以实现其刑事定罪是否正确。本文解释了这些争议,以提出一个避免有罪不罚并确保法律制度合法性的法律解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enemistad aparente: la tensión entre el concepto de graves violaciones de derechos humanos de la Corte Interamericana con el derecho pena
From the judgment of the Barrios Altos case vs. Peru, the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights began to develop the concept of «serious violations of rights» and their consequences in the national criminal sphere. Despite being a consolidated standard, nowadays there are still doubts about what acts should be classified under such legal category and if it is correct to limit certain procedural and criminal guarantees in order to achieve their criminalization. This paper explains these controversies in order to propose a legal solution that avoids impunity and ensures the legitimacy of the legal system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Las transgresiones respetuosas de la enseñanza del common law y el derecho civil en Quebec: lecciones del método transistémico de educación jurídica Violencia sexual y derecho penal: sobre los problemas contemporáneos en la interpretación del tipo penal de violación sexual en el Código Penal del Perú La formulación de un estándar normativo de imparcialidad que incorpore la imparcialidad objetivo-cognitiva en el ordenamiento jurídico peruano: un estudio sobre la repercusión de la jurisprudencia de los tribunales internacionales de derechos humanos Reflexiones sobre los fundamentos de la responsabilidad médica por wrongful life. ¿La vida como daño? Descripción de los riesgos y desafíos para la integridad académica de aplicaciones generativas de inteligencia artificial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1