走向平权女权主义男孩研究

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.3167/BHS.2021.140106
T. Laurie, Catherine Driscoll, L. Grealy, S. Tang, Grace Sharkey
{"title":"走向平权女权主义男孩研究","authors":"T. Laurie, Catherine Driscoll, L. Grealy, S. Tang, Grace Sharkey","doi":"10.3167/BHS.2021.140106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This critical commentary considers the significance of Connell’s The Men and the Boys in the development of an affirmative feminist boys studies. In particular, the article asks: How can research on boys contribute to feminist research on childhood and youth, without either establishing a false equivalency with girls studies, or overstating the singularity of “the boy” across diverse cultural and historical contexts? Connell’s four-tiered account of social relations—political, economic, emotional, and symbolic—provides an important corrective to reductionist approaches to both feminism and boyhood, and this article draws on The Men and the Boys to think through contrasting sites of identity formation around boys: online cultures of “incels” (involuntary celibates); transmasculinities and the biological diversity of the category “man”; and the social power excercised within an elite Australian boys school. The article concludes by identifying contemporary challenges emerging from the heuristic model offered in The Men and the Boys.","PeriodicalId":42228,"journal":{"name":"Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an Affirmative Feminist Boys Studies\",\"authors\":\"T. Laurie, Catherine Driscoll, L. Grealy, S. Tang, Grace Sharkey\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/BHS.2021.140106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This critical commentary considers the significance of Connell’s The Men and the Boys in the development of an affirmative feminist boys studies. In particular, the article asks: How can research on boys contribute to feminist research on childhood and youth, without either establishing a false equivalency with girls studies, or overstating the singularity of “the boy” across diverse cultural and historical contexts? Connell’s four-tiered account of social relations—political, economic, emotional, and symbolic—provides an important corrective to reductionist approaches to both feminism and boyhood, and this article draws on The Men and the Boys to think through contrasting sites of identity formation around boys: online cultures of “incels” (involuntary celibates); transmasculinities and the biological diversity of the category “man”; and the social power excercised within an elite Australian boys school. The article concludes by identifying contemporary challenges emerging from the heuristic model offered in The Men and the Boys.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/BHS.2021.140106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/BHS.2021.140106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文评述了康奈尔的《男人与男孩》在平权女性主义男孩研究发展中的重要意义。这篇文章特别提出了一个问题:关于男孩的研究如何能为女性主义关于童年和青年的研究做出贡献,既不建立与女孩研究的错误等同,也不夸大“男孩”在不同文化和历史背景下的独特性?康奈尔对社会关系的四级描述——政治、经济、情感和象征——为女权主义和少年时代的简化主义方法提供了重要的纠正,本文借鉴了《男人和男孩》,通过对男孩周围身份形成的对比网站进行思考:“incels”(非自愿的独身者)的网络文化;跨男性化与“男人”范畴的生物多样性;以及在一所澳大利亚精英男校中行使的社会权力。文章最后指出了《男人和男孩》中启发式模型所带来的当代挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards an Affirmative Feminist Boys Studies
This critical commentary considers the significance of Connell’s The Men and the Boys in the development of an affirmative feminist boys studies. In particular, the article asks: How can research on boys contribute to feminist research on childhood and youth, without either establishing a false equivalency with girls studies, or overstating the singularity of “the boy” across diverse cultural and historical contexts? Connell’s four-tiered account of social relations—political, economic, emotional, and symbolic—provides an important corrective to reductionist approaches to both feminism and boyhood, and this article draws on The Men and the Boys to think through contrasting sites of identity formation around boys: online cultures of “incels” (involuntary celibates); transmasculinities and the biological diversity of the category “man”; and the social power excercised within an elite Australian boys school. The article concludes by identifying contemporary challenges emerging from the heuristic model offered in The Men and the Boys.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal
Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Student-Led Cricket Matches as a Product of Coaching/Mentoring Influenced Gender Identities Book Review Observations on Belonging and Brotherhood in All-Male Catholic Schools The Normal Foreskin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1