组织研究文献综述的系统性：框架与评价

IF 8.9 2区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1177/10944281211008652

Zeki Simsek, B. Fox, Ciaran Heavey

{"title":"组织研究文献综述的系统性：框架与评价","authors":"Zeki Simsek, B. Fox, Ciaran Heavey","doi":"10.1177/10944281211008652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, connectedness, universalism, and coherence. We then supplement that conceptual development with empirical insights into the reported practices of systematicity in a sample of 165 published reviews across three journals in organizational research. We finally trace implications for the future conduct of literature reviews, including the potential perils of systematicity without mindfulness.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"26 1","pages":"292 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10944281211008652","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Zeki Simsek, B. Fox, Ciaran Heavey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10944281211008652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, connectedness, universalism, and coherence. We then supplement that conceptual development with empirical insights into the reported practices of systematicity in a sample of 165 published reviews across three journals in organizational research. We finally trace implications for the future conduct of literature reviews, including the potential perils of systematicity without mindfulness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizational Research Methods\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"292 - 321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10944281211008652\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizational Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211008652\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211008652","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 30

摘要

在这项研究中，我们首先开发了一个框架，根据透明、覆盖、饱和、连通性、普遍主义和连贯性的原则，将系统性作为在文献综述实践中应用显式方法的一个包罗万象的方向。然后，我们在组织研究的三种期刊上发表的165篇评论样本中，用对所报道的系统性实践的经验见解来补充这一概念发展。最后，我们追溯了对未来文学评论的影响，包括没有正念的系统性的潜在危险。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment

In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, connectedness, universalism, and coherence. We then supplement that conceptual development with empirical insights into the reported practices of systematicity in a sample of 165 published reviews across three journals in organizational research. We finally trace implications for the future conduct of literature reviews, including the potential perils of systematicity without mindfulness.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Organizational Research Methods Multiple-

CiteScore

23.20

自引率

3.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Organizational Research Methods (ORM) was founded with the aim of introducing pertinent methodological advancements to researchers in organizational sciences. The objective of ORM is to promote the application of current and emerging methodologies to advance both theory and research practices. Articles are expected to be comprehensible to readers with a background consistent with the methodological and statistical training provided in contemporary organizational sciences doctoral programs. The text should be presented in a manner that facilitates accessibility. For instance, highly technical content should be placed in appendices, and authors are encouraged to include example data and computer code when relevant. Additionally, authors should explicitly outline how their contribution has the potential to advance organizational theory and research practice.