芬兰高中物理资优学生多元智能自评

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02783193.2021.2005205
Taina Makkonen, J. Lavonen, K. Tirri
{"title":"芬兰高中物理资优学生多元智能自评","authors":"Taina Makkonen, J. Lavonen, K. Tirri","doi":"10.1080/02783193.2021.2005205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This quantitative study examined self-perceptions of multiple intelligences among gifted physics-oriented Finnish upper-secondary students (N = 164). The specific focus was on gender differences in the self-evaluated intelligence profiles. The data were gathered via an online questionnaire based on Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences. The highest overall ratings were in environmental, spiritual, and logical-mathematical intelligences, and the lowest in linguistic intelligence. Several gender- and grade-level-related differences appeared. Males with similar grades as females in physics, mathematics, and English perceived their intelligence as higher in logical-mathematical and spatial areas. Females thought more positively of their linguistic and environmental intelligence. The findings give cause for concern about genuine gender equity in education in a country such as Finland with high overall equality.","PeriodicalId":46979,"journal":{"name":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"19 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Evaluated Multiple Intelligences of Gifted Upper-Secondary-School Physics Students in Finland\",\"authors\":\"Taina Makkonen, J. Lavonen, K. Tirri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02783193.2021.2005205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This quantitative study examined self-perceptions of multiple intelligences among gifted physics-oriented Finnish upper-secondary students (N = 164). The specific focus was on gender differences in the self-evaluated intelligence profiles. The data were gathered via an online questionnaire based on Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences. The highest overall ratings were in environmental, spiritual, and logical-mathematical intelligences, and the lowest in linguistic intelligence. Several gender- and grade-level-related differences appeared. Males with similar grades as females in physics, mathematics, and English perceived their intelligence as higher in logical-mathematical and spatial areas. Females thought more positively of their linguistic and environmental intelligence. The findings give cause for concern about genuine gender equity in education in a country such as Finland with high overall equality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.2005205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.2005205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本定量研究考察了164名芬兰资优物理高中生的多元智能自我认知。特别关注的是自我评估智力档案中的性别差异。数据是通过基于加德纳多元智能理论的在线问卷收集的。总体得分最高的是环境智能、精神智能和逻辑数学智能,最低的是语言智能。出现了一些与性别和年级有关的差异。在物理、数学和英语方面与女性成绩相似的男性认为他们在逻辑数学和空间领域的智力更高。女性对自己的语言和环境智力的评价更为积极。研究结果引起了人们对芬兰这样一个整体性别平等程度很高的国家在教育方面是否存在真正的性别平等的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-Evaluated Multiple Intelligences of Gifted Upper-Secondary-School Physics Students in Finland
ABSTRACT This quantitative study examined self-perceptions of multiple intelligences among gifted physics-oriented Finnish upper-secondary students (N = 164). The specific focus was on gender differences in the self-evaluated intelligence profiles. The data were gathered via an online questionnaire based on Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences. The highest overall ratings were in environmental, spiritual, and logical-mathematical intelligences, and the lowest in linguistic intelligence. Several gender- and grade-level-related differences appeared. Males with similar grades as females in physics, mathematics, and English perceived their intelligence as higher in logical-mathematical and spatial areas. Females thought more positively of their linguistic and environmental intelligence. The findings give cause for concern about genuine gender equity in education in a country such as Finland with high overall equality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
The Life and Work of Marcia Gentry: Providing Opportunities and Promoting Excellence Marcia Gentry: Early Research Passions and Subsequent Important Contributions to Equity and Diverse Students Marcia Gentry as Influencer: Leader, Scholar, Colleague, Friend Memories and Musings: My Experiences with Marcia Gentry and More Inspiring the Future: An Interview with Kenneth Kiewra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1