新冠肺炎大流行期间远程毒品法庭评估的初步经验教训

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Crime & Justice Pub Date : 2022-03-06 DOI:10.1080/0735648X.2022.2047100
Elizabeth N. Hartsell, J. Lane
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间远程毒品法庭评估的初步经验教训","authors":"Elizabeth N. Hartsell, J. Lane","doi":"10.1080/0735648X.2022.2047100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed how the justice system and its research partners can do their work. We were working with the Marion County Diversion Drug Court doing preliminary observations and developing a collaborative grant proposal to implement services and evaluate the program when the court was forced to move entirely online using Zoom due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper discusses how the transition to Zoom changed the evaluation of the drug court and service delivery. While we expected to conduct in-person focus groups and interviews with the court team and participants, as well as in-person observations of team meetings and court, these were not possible from March 2020 to June 2021 (in person court resumed in July 2021). Consequently, we adapted the now-funded, ongoing evaluation plan to conduct observations, interviews, and coding via Zoom and Qualtrics. We discuss the strengths, limitations, and early lessons learned from this endeavor. We also report initial findings on how COVID-19 affected service delivery and explore the possible implications of online drug court beyond the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":46770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crime & Justice","volume":"45 1","pages":"627 - 645"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial lessons learned during a remote drug court evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth N. Hartsell, J. Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0735648X.2022.2047100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed how the justice system and its research partners can do their work. We were working with the Marion County Diversion Drug Court doing preliminary observations and developing a collaborative grant proposal to implement services and evaluate the program when the court was forced to move entirely online using Zoom due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper discusses how the transition to Zoom changed the evaluation of the drug court and service delivery. While we expected to conduct in-person focus groups and interviews with the court team and participants, as well as in-person observations of team meetings and court, these were not possible from March 2020 to June 2021 (in person court resumed in July 2021). Consequently, we adapted the now-funded, ongoing evaluation plan to conduct observations, interviews, and coding via Zoom and Qualtrics. We discuss the strengths, limitations, and early lessons learned from this endeavor. We also report initial findings on how COVID-19 affected service delivery and explore the possible implications of online drug court beyond the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crime & Justice\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"627 - 645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crime & Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2022.2047100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crime & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2022.2047100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行极大地改变了司法系统及其研究伙伴开展工作的方式。由于COVID-19大流行,我们正在与马里昂县转移毒品法院合作,进行初步观察并制定合作赠款提案,以实施服务并评估该计划,当时法院被迫完全使用Zoom在线。本文讨论了向Zoom过渡如何改变了对毒品法庭的评价和服务提供。虽然我们预计将对法庭团队和参与者进行面对面的焦点小组和访谈,以及对团队会议和法庭进行面对面的观察,但这些在2020年3月至2021年6月期间无法实现(当面法庭于2021年7月恢复)。因此,我们调整了现在资助的、正在进行的评估计划,通过Zoom和Qualtrics进行观察、访谈和编码。我们讨论了从这一努力中获得的优势、局限性和早期经验教训。我们还报告了COVID-19如何影响服务提供的初步调查结果,并探讨了在线毒品法庭在大流行之后可能产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Initial lessons learned during a remote drug court evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic
ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed how the justice system and its research partners can do their work. We were working with the Marion County Diversion Drug Court doing preliminary observations and developing a collaborative grant proposal to implement services and evaluate the program when the court was forced to move entirely online using Zoom due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper discusses how the transition to Zoom changed the evaluation of the drug court and service delivery. While we expected to conduct in-person focus groups and interviews with the court team and participants, as well as in-person observations of team meetings and court, these were not possible from March 2020 to June 2021 (in person court resumed in July 2021). Consequently, we adapted the now-funded, ongoing evaluation plan to conduct observations, interviews, and coding via Zoom and Qualtrics. We discuss the strengths, limitations, and early lessons learned from this endeavor. We also report initial findings on how COVID-19 affected service delivery and explore the possible implications of online drug court beyond the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Crime & Justice
Journal of Crime & Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Does type of counsel matter? A Comparison of outcomes in cases involving retained- and assigned counsel An empirical analysis of the (Un)readability of inmate handbooks Opioid misuse and legislative responses in U.S. states: politics and lawmaking to address a public health crisis The impact of professional orientations on officers’ supervision behaviors in juvenile and adult community corrections: a multi-agency analysis Examining risk and risk perception on LSD and MDMA in online marketplaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1