2019冠状病毒病在泰国南部爆发期间,公共卫生人员的封锁压力和倦怠

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING Nursing and Midwifery Studies Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.4103/nms.nms_92_20
Sopista Tunthanathip, Kasetchai Laeheem, Patchaima Buayom, Veraya Khwanthong, Chalermpol Osotpromma
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病在泰国南部爆发期间,公共卫生人员的封锁压力和倦怠","authors":"Sopista Tunthanathip, Kasetchai Laeheem, Patchaima Buayom, Veraya Khwanthong, Chalermpol Osotpromma","doi":"10.4103/nms.nms_92_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected people around the world. Therefore, this situation has caused stress and burnout among the people and public health staff in Thailand. Objective: This study aimed to compare the stress and burnout levels among public health personnel during the lockdown and un-lockdown periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. The secondary objective was to identify the factors associated with stress and burnout. Methods: This research was a cross-sectional survey study with online self-rated questionnaires. The sample size was 158 participants. Using convenience sampling, participants who worked in 12th health region, Southern Thailand took the questionnaire twice. The first time was during May–June 2020, which was the lockdown period from the COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand, and the participants completed the questionnaires again during July–August in the same year, which was the un-lockdown period. The non-parametric sign test, Spearman’s correlation, and logistic regression analyses were performed for testing the hypotheses. Results: The average total scores for stress during the lockdown and un-lockdown periods were 4.139 ± 3.534 and 3.398 ± 3.344, respectively. Moreover, the average total scores for burnout during the lockdown and un-lockdown periods were 1.573 ± 0.777 and 1.519 ± 0.702, respectively. The stress scores during the lockdown period were significantly higher than those during the un-lockdown period (sign test, P = 0.02). The stress correlated with the burnout by using Spearman’s correlation (P < 0.001). Binary logistic regression showed that the stress score (odds ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval 1.41–2.91) was a risk factor for burnout. Conclusion: During the outbreak, the stress and burnout were high; the health organizations should have interventions or activities to reduce stress and burnout.","PeriodicalId":45398,"journal":{"name":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lockdown stress and burnout of public health personnel during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Southern Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Sopista Tunthanathip, Kasetchai Laeheem, Patchaima Buayom, Veraya Khwanthong, Chalermpol Osotpromma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/nms.nms_92_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected people around the world. Therefore, this situation has caused stress and burnout among the people and public health staff in Thailand. Objective: This study aimed to compare the stress and burnout levels among public health personnel during the lockdown and un-lockdown periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. The secondary objective was to identify the factors associated with stress and burnout. Methods: This research was a cross-sectional survey study with online self-rated questionnaires. The sample size was 158 participants. Using convenience sampling, participants who worked in 12th health region, Southern Thailand took the questionnaire twice. The first time was during May–June 2020, which was the lockdown period from the COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand, and the participants completed the questionnaires again during July–August in the same year, which was the un-lockdown period. The non-parametric sign test, Spearman’s correlation, and logistic regression analyses were performed for testing the hypotheses. Results: The average total scores for stress during the lockdown and un-lockdown periods were 4.139 ± 3.534 and 3.398 ± 3.344, respectively. Moreover, the average total scores for burnout during the lockdown and un-lockdown periods were 1.573 ± 0.777 and 1.519 ± 0.702, respectively. The stress scores during the lockdown period were significantly higher than those during the un-lockdown period (sign test, P = 0.02). The stress correlated with the burnout by using Spearman’s correlation (P < 0.001). Binary logistic regression showed that the stress score (odds ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval 1.41–2.91) was a risk factor for burnout. Conclusion: During the outbreak, the stress and burnout were high; the health organizations should have interventions or activities to reduce stress and burnout.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing and Midwifery Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing and Midwifery Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_92_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_92_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行影响了世界各地的人们。因此,这种情况在泰国人民和公共卫生工作人员中造成了压力和倦怠。目的:本研究旨在比较新冠肺炎疫情封锁和非封锁期间泰国公共卫生人员的压力和倦怠水平。次要目的是确定与压力和倦怠相关的因素。方法:本研究是一项横断面调查研究,采用在线自评问卷。样本量为158名参与者。使用方便抽样法,在泰国南部第12卫生区工作的参与者进行了两次问卷调查。第一次是在2020年5月至6月,即新冠肺炎在泰国爆发后的封锁期,参与者在同年7月至8月再次完成问卷调查,即未封锁期。采用非参数符号检验、Spearman相关和逻辑回归分析对假设进行检验。结果:封锁期和非封锁期的压力平均总分分别为4.139±3.534和3.398±3.344。此外,在封锁和非封锁期间,倦怠的平均总分分别为1.573±0.777和1.519±0.702。封锁期间的压力得分显著高于非封锁期间(符号检验,P=0.02)。通过Spearman相关性,压力与倦怠相关(P<0.001)。二元逻辑回归显示,压力得分(比值比1.75;95%置信区间1.41-2.91)是倦怠的危险因素。结论:疫情暴发期间,应激和倦怠程度较高;卫生组织应该采取干预措施或活动来减少压力和倦怠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lockdown stress and burnout of public health personnel during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Southern Thailand
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected people around the world. Therefore, this situation has caused stress and burnout among the people and public health staff in Thailand. Objective: This study aimed to compare the stress and burnout levels among public health personnel during the lockdown and un-lockdown periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. The secondary objective was to identify the factors associated with stress and burnout. Methods: This research was a cross-sectional survey study with online self-rated questionnaires. The sample size was 158 participants. Using convenience sampling, participants who worked in 12th health region, Southern Thailand took the questionnaire twice. The first time was during May–June 2020, which was the lockdown period from the COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand, and the participants completed the questionnaires again during July–August in the same year, which was the un-lockdown period. The non-parametric sign test, Spearman’s correlation, and logistic regression analyses were performed for testing the hypotheses. Results: The average total scores for stress during the lockdown and un-lockdown periods were 4.139 ± 3.534 and 3.398 ± 3.344, respectively. Moreover, the average total scores for burnout during the lockdown and un-lockdown periods were 1.573 ± 0.777 and 1.519 ± 0.702, respectively. The stress scores during the lockdown period were significantly higher than those during the un-lockdown period (sign test, P = 0.02). The stress correlated with the burnout by using Spearman’s correlation (P < 0.001). Binary logistic regression showed that the stress score (odds ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval 1.41–2.91) was a risk factor for burnout. Conclusion: During the outbreak, the stress and burnout were high; the health organizations should have interventions or activities to reduce stress and burnout.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived stress and social support in pregnant women during the COVID-19 Pandemic Physical resilience and its related factors in Iranian older adults with ischemic heart disease: A cross-sectional study Psychological well-being and coping strategies of midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A qualitative study The Effects of Nigella sativa and curcumin supplementation on oxidative stress biomarkers in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis or osteopenia: A triple-blind factorial randomized controlled trial Effects of ambulation during the first stage of labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1