1965 - 1980年,英国政府在津巴布韦民族主义宣传中的代表

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY Casopis za Suvremenu Povijest Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.1177/00220094221136799
Hugh Pattenden
{"title":"1965 - 1980年,英国政府在津巴布韦民族主义宣传中的代表","authors":"Hugh Pattenden","doi":"10.1177/00220094221136799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the ways in which the two main African nationalist opposition groups in Rhodesia portrayed Britain in their media output. It uses a variety of sources, including newspapers, magazines, radio, and television programmes to recreate the key messages of the Zimbabwe African National Union and Zimbabwe African People's Union during the Unilateral Declaration of Independence period (1965–80). It argues that both groups recognised the importance of using propaganda for political purposes and developed an image of Britain as they believed it should be seen by the World. It further suggests, however, that this depiction of Britain was not always consistently applied, and that wider pressures can be seen at play. At times they claimed that the British were on the side of the rebellious settlers, and not to be trusted. Yet on other occasions they keenly asserted that, as the colonial power, the British Government had responsibility for Rhodesia and should be the focus of negotiations. In looking at these issues, this exploration of the propaganda war seeks to expand the historiography of Britain, Rhodesia, and the Zimbabwean nationalist movement.","PeriodicalId":53857,"journal":{"name":"Casopis za Suvremenu Povijest","volume":"58 1","pages":"152 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Representation of the British Government in Zimbabwean Nationalist Propaganda, 1965–80\",\"authors\":\"Hugh Pattenden\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00220094221136799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the ways in which the two main African nationalist opposition groups in Rhodesia portrayed Britain in their media output. It uses a variety of sources, including newspapers, magazines, radio, and television programmes to recreate the key messages of the Zimbabwe African National Union and Zimbabwe African People's Union during the Unilateral Declaration of Independence period (1965–80). It argues that both groups recognised the importance of using propaganda for political purposes and developed an image of Britain as they believed it should be seen by the World. It further suggests, however, that this depiction of Britain was not always consistently applied, and that wider pressures can be seen at play. At times they claimed that the British were on the side of the rebellious settlers, and not to be trusted. Yet on other occasions they keenly asserted that, as the colonial power, the British Government had responsibility for Rhodesia and should be the focus of negotiations. In looking at these issues, this exploration of the propaganda war seeks to expand the historiography of Britain, Rhodesia, and the Zimbabwean nationalist movement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Casopis za Suvremenu Povijest\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"152 - 176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Casopis za Suvremenu Povijest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094221136799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Casopis za Suvremenu Povijest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094221136799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了罗得西亚的两个主要非洲民族主义反对派团体在其媒体输出中描绘英国的方式。它利用各种来源,包括报纸、杂志、广播和电视节目,再现津巴布韦非洲民族联盟和津巴布韦非洲人民联盟在单方面宣布独立期间(1965-80年)的主要信息。它认为,两派都认识到利用宣传达到政治目的的重要性,并形成了他们认为应该被世界看到的英国形象。然而,它进一步表明,这种对英国的描述并不总是一贯适用,而且可以看到更广泛的压力在起作用。有时,他们声称英国人站在反叛的定居者一边,不值得信任。然而,在其他场合,他们强烈地断言,作为殖民大国,英国政府对罗得西亚负有责任,并应成为谈判的焦点。在观察这些问题时,对宣传战的探索试图扩展英国、罗得西亚和津巴布韦民族主义运动的史学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Representation of the British Government in Zimbabwean Nationalist Propaganda, 1965–80
This article explores the ways in which the two main African nationalist opposition groups in Rhodesia portrayed Britain in their media output. It uses a variety of sources, including newspapers, magazines, radio, and television programmes to recreate the key messages of the Zimbabwe African National Union and Zimbabwe African People's Union during the Unilateral Declaration of Independence period (1965–80). It argues that both groups recognised the importance of using propaganda for political purposes and developed an image of Britain as they believed it should be seen by the World. It further suggests, however, that this depiction of Britain was not always consistently applied, and that wider pressures can be seen at play. At times they claimed that the British were on the side of the rebellious settlers, and not to be trusted. Yet on other occasions they keenly asserted that, as the colonial power, the British Government had responsibility for Rhodesia and should be the focus of negotiations. In looking at these issues, this exploration of the propaganda war seeks to expand the historiography of Britain, Rhodesia, and the Zimbabwean nationalist movement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Croatian Emigration in North America and Aid Shipments to the Population of the „Old Country” during 1944 and 1945 The Convergence of the Political Strategies of Slovene Catholic Populists and Liberals in World War I The Establishment of Trade Relations between the Socialist Republic of Montenegro and the Federal States of the Federal Republic of Germany Radna snaga iz Nezavisne Države Hrvatske za njemačku zrakoplovnu industriju “Cultural phenomena of two giants”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1