双通道测量的B型不确定度

IF 0.1 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Ukrainian Metrological Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI:10.24027/2306-7039.4.2022.276316
M. Dorozhovets
{"title":"双通道测量的B型不确定度","authors":"M. Dorozhovets","doi":"10.24027/2306-7039.4.2022.276316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the problems of evaluating the standard uncertainty of measuring a quantity using the type B method, the result of which is the average value of the results obtained from two channels with the same parameters, for example, as the indications of two measuring instruments of the same type. It is shown that for given values of maximum permissible errors (MPE) of measuring instruments and their readings x1 and x2, the uncertainty of the result determined a posteriori is not equal to the uncertainty determined by the conventional method (GUM). It is shown that when the measurement result is determined as arithmetic mean y=(x1+x2)/2, additional information as the half distance of readings v=|x1-x2|/2 can be used to correctly determine the standard uncertainty of such measurement. Depending on the half distance of readings, the standard uncertainty can theoretically vary from its maximum value (the readings of both meters are equal) to zero (with maximum difference in readings). The analysis of the uncertainty was carried out for uniform distributions of possible deviations of the readings of measuring instruments within their MPE. The results of simulations by the modified Monte-Carlo method, which show good convergence with theoretical results, are given.","PeriodicalId":40775,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type B uncertainty of two-channel measurements\",\"authors\":\"M. Dorozhovets\",\"doi\":\"10.24027/2306-7039.4.2022.276316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents the problems of evaluating the standard uncertainty of measuring a quantity using the type B method, the result of which is the average value of the results obtained from two channels with the same parameters, for example, as the indications of two measuring instruments of the same type. It is shown that for given values of maximum permissible errors (MPE) of measuring instruments and their readings x1 and x2, the uncertainty of the result determined a posteriori is not equal to the uncertainty determined by the conventional method (GUM). It is shown that when the measurement result is determined as arithmetic mean y=(x1+x2)/2, additional information as the half distance of readings v=|x1-x2|/2 can be used to correctly determine the standard uncertainty of such measurement. Depending on the half distance of readings, the standard uncertainty can theoretically vary from its maximum value (the readings of both meters are equal) to zero (with maximum difference in readings). The analysis of the uncertainty was carried out for uniform distributions of possible deviations of the readings of measuring instruments within their MPE. The results of simulations by the modified Monte-Carlo method, which show good convergence with theoretical results, are given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrainian Metrological Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrainian Metrological Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.4.2022.276316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.4.2022.276316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了使用B型方法评估测量量的标准不确定度的问题,该方法的结果是从具有相同参数的两个通道获得的结果的平均值,例如,作为同一类型的两个测量仪器的指示。结果表明,对于给定的测量仪器的最大允许误差(MPE)值及其读数x1和x2,后验确定的结果的不确定性不等于传统方法(GUM)确定的不确定性。结果表明,当测量结果被确定为算术平均值y=(x1+x2)/2时,可以使用诸如读数的半距离v=|x1-x2|/2的附加信息来正确地确定这种测量的标准不确定度。根据读数的半距离,标准不确定度理论上可以从其最大值(两个仪表的读数相等)到零(读数差异最大)不等。对测量仪器读数在MPE范围内可能偏差的均匀分布进行了不确定度分析。文中给出了改进蒙特卡罗方法的仿真结果,与理论结果具有良好的收敛性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Type B uncertainty of two-channel measurements
The paper presents the problems of evaluating the standard uncertainty of measuring a quantity using the type B method, the result of which is the average value of the results obtained from two channels with the same parameters, for example, as the indications of two measuring instruments of the same type. It is shown that for given values of maximum permissible errors (MPE) of measuring instruments and their readings x1 and x2, the uncertainty of the result determined a posteriori is not equal to the uncertainty determined by the conventional method (GUM). It is shown that when the measurement result is determined as arithmetic mean y=(x1+x2)/2, additional information as the half distance of readings v=|x1-x2|/2 can be used to correctly determine the standard uncertainty of such measurement. Depending on the half distance of readings, the standard uncertainty can theoretically vary from its maximum value (the readings of both meters are equal) to zero (with maximum difference in readings). The analysis of the uncertainty was carried out for uniform distributions of possible deviations of the readings of measuring instruments within their MPE. The results of simulations by the modified Monte-Carlo method, which show good convergence with theoretical results, are given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ukrainian Metrological Journal
Ukrainian Metrological Journal INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
A statistical method for the assessment of metrological characteristics of reference materials Study of metrological characteristics of the state primary measurement standard of volume flow and mass consumption of liquid in preparation for participation in international comparisons The estimation of the long-term drift of the inductance measurement standards Study of reading errors when calibrating analog ohmmeters Modern approaches to studying the accuracy of determination of deformation values in geodesic monitoring of crane equipment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1