年轻低危重度主动脉狭窄患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较

Q4 Medicine US Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI:10.15420/usc.2022.08
Q. Nguyen, J. Luc, T. MacGillivray, O. Preventza
{"title":"年轻低危重度主动脉狭窄患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较","authors":"Q. Nguyen, J. Luc, T. MacGillivray, O. Preventza","doi":"10.15420/usc.2022.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aortic stenosis is a common form of acquired degenerative valvular disease associated with poor survival after the onset of symptoms. Treatment options for patients with aortic stenosis in addition to medical therapy include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with either tissue or mechanical valves, or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves via either transfemoral or alternative access routes. In this review, the authors discuss the current evidence and special considerations regarding the use of TAVR versus SAVR in the management of severe aortic stenosis in young (<65 years of age), low-risk patients, highlighting the history of aortic stenosis treatment, the current guidelines and recommendations, and important issues that remain to be addressed. Ultimately, until ongoing clinical trials with long-term follow-up data shed light on whether interventions for aortic stenosis can be broadened to a low-risk population, TAVR in young, low-risk patients should be undertaken with caution and with guidance from a multidisciplinary heart team.","PeriodicalId":37809,"journal":{"name":"US Cardiology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Young, Low-risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"Q. Nguyen, J. Luc, T. MacGillivray, O. Preventza\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/usc.2022.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aortic stenosis is a common form of acquired degenerative valvular disease associated with poor survival after the onset of symptoms. Treatment options for patients with aortic stenosis in addition to medical therapy include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with either tissue or mechanical valves, or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves via either transfemoral or alternative access routes. In this review, the authors discuss the current evidence and special considerations regarding the use of TAVR versus SAVR in the management of severe aortic stenosis in young (<65 years of age), low-risk patients, highlighting the history of aortic stenosis treatment, the current guidelines and recommendations, and important issues that remain to be addressed. Ultimately, until ongoing clinical trials with long-term follow-up data shed light on whether interventions for aortic stenosis can be broadened to a low-risk population, TAVR in young, low-risk patients should be undertaken with caution and with guidance from a multidisciplinary heart team.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"US Cardiology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"US Cardiology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2022.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2022.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉狭窄是一种常见的获得性退行性瓣膜病,症状出现后生存率低。除了药物治疗外,主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗选择还包括组织或机械瓣膜的外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR),或通过经股或替代途径的球囊扩张或自扩张瓣膜的经导管主动脉瓣置换法(TAVR)。在这篇综述中,作者讨论了目前使用TAVR与SAVR治疗年轻(<65岁)低风险患者严重主动脉瓣狭窄的证据和特殊注意事项,强调了主动脉瓣狭窄治疗的历史、目前的指南和建议,以及有待解决的重要问题。最终,在正在进行的具有长期随访数据的临床试验阐明主动脉瓣狭窄的干预措施是否可以扩大到低风险人群之前,年轻低风险患者的TAVR应谨慎进行,并在多学科心脏团队的指导下进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Young, Low-risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis
Aortic stenosis is a common form of acquired degenerative valvular disease associated with poor survival after the onset of symptoms. Treatment options for patients with aortic stenosis in addition to medical therapy include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with either tissue or mechanical valves, or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves via either transfemoral or alternative access routes. In this review, the authors discuss the current evidence and special considerations regarding the use of TAVR versus SAVR in the management of severe aortic stenosis in young (<65 years of age), low-risk patients, highlighting the history of aortic stenosis treatment, the current guidelines and recommendations, and important issues that remain to be addressed. Ultimately, until ongoing clinical trials with long-term follow-up data shed light on whether interventions for aortic stenosis can be broadened to a low-risk population, TAVR in young, low-risk patients should be undertaken with caution and with guidance from a multidisciplinary heart team.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
US Cardiology Review
US Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: US Cardiology Review (USC) is an international, US-English language, peer-reviewed journal that is published bi-annually and aims to assist time-pressured physicians to stay abreast of key advances and opinion in the area of cardiovascular disease. The journal comprises balanced and comprehensive review articles written by leading authorities. The journal provides updates on a range of salient issues to support physicians in developing their knowledge and effectiveness in day-to-day clinical practice. The journal endeavours to support the continuous medical education of specialist and general cardiologists and disseminate knowledge of the field to the wider cardiovascular community.
期刊最新文献
MI and Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries New Innovations to Address Sudden Cardiac Arrest Sex and Gender Differences in Fibromuscular Dysplasia Executive Summary from the 2023 Charleston HFpEF Conference Early Ventricular Septal Rupture following Acute Myocardial Infarction Diagnosed on Left Ventriculogram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1