The prognostic value of concomitant carcinoma in situ in patients with upper tract urinary carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: an systematic review and Meta-analysis

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of concomitant carcinoma in situ (CCIS) on tumor survival for the upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) through systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods In the light of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed and EMBASE China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang database by key words "upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma" "renal sputum cancer" "concomitant carcinoma in situ" , and "radical ureterectomy" were performed for all reports that included detailed results on the predictors of CCIS. The search deadline is June 2019, and the search terms are English and Chinese. Methodological quality evaluation was performed using the QUIPS tool, and statistical analysis of the relevant data was performed using Stata 12.0 and RevMan 5.3 software. Results Sixteen articles were included in this study and all published between 2012 and 2019. A total of 11 131 patients with UTUC, including 1 774 (15.9%) patients with CCIS. According to our final results, there was a significant correlation of CCIS with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR=1.10, 95%CI 1.05-1.16, P<0.001), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=1.15, 95%CI 1.09-1.21, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR=1.10, 95%CI 1.03-1.17, P=0.003). Begg′s bias analysis showed no significant publication bias in CSS (P=0.822), RFS (P=0.348), and OS (P=0.452). Conclusions This study demonstrated that CCIS was associated with poor oncological outcome and could serve as a independent prognostic factor for patient with UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy. Key words: Urologic diseases; Upper tract urinary carcinoma; Radical nephroureterectomy; Concomitant carcinoma in situ; Prognosis; Meta-analysis