老年人就业项目必要性和有效性的实验研究:政策框架与年龄组的互动效应

Joohyun Oh, Y. Park
{"title":"老年人就业项目必要性和有效性的实验研究:政策框架与年龄组的互动效应","authors":"Joohyun Oh, Y. Park","doi":"10.31888/jkgs.2022.42.3.603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welfare policies for the older adults are essential to the unprepared older adults generation in an unprecedentedly fast population aged society. However, although the allocation according to demographic characteristics in welfare policies is a universal method, welfare policies focusing on older adults are seeds of the generational conflict centered on economic interests. The purpose of this study is to explore how policy framing should be taken to positively enhance the public's attitude toward the older adults’s job project, which is part of the welfare policy for the older adults. To this end, we set up and conducted a 3 policy framing (Welfare Policy vs. Economic Revitalization Policy vs. Welfare & Economic Revitalization Policy) × 2 age group (20s, 30s vs. 50s, 60s) between-subject experimental design. The result showed that people in the young age group (the 20s and 30s) positively evaluated the need for policies when presenting the goal of the policy as Welfare & Economic Revitalization Policy, compared to others. On the other hand, people in the older adults group (the 50s and 60s) evaluated the older adults job project positively regardless of policy framing but showed a relatively more favorable attitude when suggesting policies to revitalize the economy rather than welfare. In conclusion, implications for the results of analysis and the direction of public relations of welfare policies for senior citizens are suggested. \n","PeriodicalId":90513,"journal":{"name":"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Study on Necessity and Effectiveness of Job Creating Project for Older Adults: Interaction Effect of Policy Framing and Age Group\",\"authors\":\"Joohyun Oh, Y. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.31888/jkgs.2022.42.3.603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Welfare policies for the older adults are essential to the unprepared older adults generation in an unprecedentedly fast population aged society. However, although the allocation according to demographic characteristics in welfare policies is a universal method, welfare policies focusing on older adults are seeds of the generational conflict centered on economic interests. The purpose of this study is to explore how policy framing should be taken to positively enhance the public's attitude toward the older adults’s job project, which is part of the welfare policy for the older adults. To this end, we set up and conducted a 3 policy framing (Welfare Policy vs. Economic Revitalization Policy vs. Welfare & Economic Revitalization Policy) × 2 age group (20s, 30s vs. 50s, 60s) between-subject experimental design. The result showed that people in the young age group (the 20s and 30s) positively evaluated the need for policies when presenting the goal of the policy as Welfare & Economic Revitalization Policy, compared to others. On the other hand, people in the older adults group (the 50s and 60s) evaluated the older adults job project positively regardless of policy framing but showed a relatively more favorable attitude when suggesting policies to revitalize the economy rather than welfare. In conclusion, implications for the results of analysis and the direction of public relations of welfare policies for senior citizens are suggested. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":90513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31888/jkgs.2022.42.3.603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31888/jkgs.2022.42.3.603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人口老龄化速度空前快的社会中,老年人的福利政策对毫无准备的老年人一代至关重要。然而,尽管福利政策中根据人口特征进行分配是一种普遍的方法,但以老年人为重点的福利政策是以经济利益为中心的代际冲突的种子。本研究的目的是探讨如何制定政策,积极提高公众对老年人就业项目的态度,这是老年人福利政策的一部分。为此,我们建立并进行了3个政策框架(福利政策vs.经济振兴政策vs.福利和经济振兴政策)×2个年龄组(20多岁、30多岁vs.50多岁、60多岁)的受试者间实验设计。结果表明,与其他人相比,年轻年龄组(20多岁和30多岁)的人在将政策目标描述为福利和经济振兴政策时,积极评价了政策的必要性。另一方面,无论政策框架如何,老年人群体(50多岁和60多岁)对老年人就业项目的评价都是积极的,但在建议振兴经济而非福利的政策时,他们表现出了相对更有利的态度。最后,对分析结果的启示和老年人福利政策的公共关系发展方向提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental Study on Necessity and Effectiveness of Job Creating Project for Older Adults: Interaction Effect of Policy Framing and Age Group
Welfare policies for the older adults are essential to the unprepared older adults generation in an unprecedentedly fast population aged society. However, although the allocation according to demographic characteristics in welfare policies is a universal method, welfare policies focusing on older adults are seeds of the generational conflict centered on economic interests. The purpose of this study is to explore how policy framing should be taken to positively enhance the public's attitude toward the older adults’s job project, which is part of the welfare policy for the older adults. To this end, we set up and conducted a 3 policy framing (Welfare Policy vs. Economic Revitalization Policy vs. Welfare & Economic Revitalization Policy) × 2 age group (20s, 30s vs. 50s, 60s) between-subject experimental design. The result showed that people in the young age group (the 20s and 30s) positively evaluated the need for policies when presenting the goal of the policy as Welfare & Economic Revitalization Policy, compared to others. On the other hand, people in the older adults group (the 50s and 60s) evaluated the older adults job project positively regardless of policy framing but showed a relatively more favorable attitude when suggesting policies to revitalize the economy rather than welfare. In conclusion, implications for the results of analysis and the direction of public relations of welfare policies for senior citizens are suggested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Support Expectation and Policy Trust on Anxiety about Aging among the Middle-Aged: Focusing on Mediating Effect of Preparation for Old Age The Effect of the Characteristics of Users of Personalized Care Services for the Elderly on Life Satisfaction Caring for Older Adults: The Effects of Gratitude and Support in Family Caregivers' Care Burden-Distress Relationship The Effect of the Residential Environment of the Elderly on Aging in Place: Focusing on Comparison of Regions The Relationship between Nutritional Status and Depression in the Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment Group: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Social Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1