低接触协同设计:为协同设计研讨会考虑更灵活的时空模型

Q1 Arts and Humanities Strategic Design Research Journal Pub Date : 2021-04-09 DOI:10.4013/SDRJ.2021.141.11
A. Davis, I. Gwilt, Niki Wallace, Joe Langley
{"title":"低接触协同设计:为协同设计研讨会考虑更灵活的时空模型","authors":"A. Davis, I. Gwilt, Niki Wallace, Joe Langley","doi":"10.4013/SDRJ.2021.141.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent global experience of COVID-19 has problematized the face-to-face co-design process and forced co-design researchers and practitioners to rethink the process of collaboration that typically takes place in a co-design workshop. This paper considers how we might continue to co-design when physical proximity is not possible. Recognising that technology has long played a role in co-design practice, we argue that to date, the technologically mediated experience of co-design has been largely based on the assumption of replicating the physical and embodied experience of the co-design workshop. Rather than accepting the deficit culture implied through the curtailing of much of the conventional face-to-face activities we associate with co-design, this paper reports on proactive research into novel possibilities for continuing collaborative research work through the concept of ‘low-contact co-design’. A series of proprietary visual models that explore a range of spatiotemporal conditions within which co-design practices can occur are presented. Opportunities for engaging with new communities, and in new processes are highlighted and a spatiotemporal framework for planning co-design processes is presented.","PeriodicalId":52184,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Design Research Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"124-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Contact Co-Design: Considering more flexible spatiotemporal models for the co-design workshop\",\"authors\":\"A. Davis, I. Gwilt, Niki Wallace, Joe Langley\",\"doi\":\"10.4013/SDRJ.2021.141.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent global experience of COVID-19 has problematized the face-to-face co-design process and forced co-design researchers and practitioners to rethink the process of collaboration that typically takes place in a co-design workshop. This paper considers how we might continue to co-design when physical proximity is not possible. Recognising that technology has long played a role in co-design practice, we argue that to date, the technologically mediated experience of co-design has been largely based on the assumption of replicating the physical and embodied experience of the co-design workshop. Rather than accepting the deficit culture implied through the curtailing of much of the conventional face-to-face activities we associate with co-design, this paper reports on proactive research into novel possibilities for continuing collaborative research work through the concept of ‘low-contact co-design’. A series of proprietary visual models that explore a range of spatiotemporal conditions within which co-design practices can occur are presented. Opportunities for engaging with new communities, and in new processes are highlighted and a spatiotemporal framework for planning co-design processes is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Design Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"124-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Design Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4013/SDRJ.2021.141.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Design Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/SDRJ.2021.141.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

最近新冠肺炎的全球经历使面对面的共同设计过程出现了问题,并迫使共同设计研究人员和从业者重新思考通常在共同设计研讨会上进行的合作过程。本文考虑了当物理接近不可能时,我们如何继续共同设计。认识到技术长期以来在联合设计实践中发挥着作用,我们认为,到目前为止,联合设计的技术中介体验在很大程度上是基于复制联合设计研讨会的物理和具体体验的假设。本文报告了通过“低接触共同设计”的概念,积极研究继续合作研究工作的新可能性,而不是接受通过减少我们与共同设计相关的许多传统面对面活动所隐含的缺陷文化。介绍了一系列专有的视觉模型,这些模型探索了一系列时空条件,在这些条件下可以进行联合设计实践。强调了参与新社区和新流程的机会,并提出了规划共同设计流程的时空框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low-Contact Co-Design: Considering more flexible spatiotemporal models for the co-design workshop
The recent global experience of COVID-19 has problematized the face-to-face co-design process and forced co-design researchers and practitioners to rethink the process of collaboration that typically takes place in a co-design workshop. This paper considers how we might continue to co-design when physical proximity is not possible. Recognising that technology has long played a role in co-design practice, we argue that to date, the technologically mediated experience of co-design has been largely based on the assumption of replicating the physical and embodied experience of the co-design workshop. Rather than accepting the deficit culture implied through the curtailing of much of the conventional face-to-face activities we associate with co-design, this paper reports on proactive research into novel possibilities for continuing collaborative research work through the concept of ‘low-contact co-design’. A series of proprietary visual models that explore a range of spatiotemporal conditions within which co-design practices can occur are presented. Opportunities for engaging with new communities, and in new processes are highlighted and a spatiotemporal framework for planning co-design processes is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategic Design Research Journal
Strategic Design Research Journal Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Semantic Innovation as Design Strategy for Sustainability and Ergonomics – A Case Study Future Self Translating data into narratives Inclusive spatial learning experience Ergonomic Product Design: An Empirical Study on The Influencing Factors to Use and to Buy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1