反垄断、工人权利和算法

Roshni Das
{"title":"反垄断、工人权利和算法","authors":"Roshni Das","doi":"10.1080/10301763.2023.2170864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The age of algorithms has changed both the way in which we demand products and the way in which we supply labour. In respect of the labour supply process, the complexity of adequately compensating human effort so that their survival is ensured is a problem that invites all manner of social, political and legal argumentation. Three recent books attempt to untangle this problem by visiting the intersection of antitrust, workers’ rights and algorithms. To specify, Acevedo (2020) takes on the issue of the rights of workers who work for platform companies; Posner (2021) looks at the inadequacies of antitrust laws in protecting workers’ rights, both in traditional and platform organisations; and Portuese (2022) highlights the technological hurdles of regulating platform companies via conventional antitrust legal precepts.","PeriodicalId":45265,"journal":{"name":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antitrust, workers’ rights and algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Roshni Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10301763.2023.2170864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The age of algorithms has changed both the way in which we demand products and the way in which we supply labour. In respect of the labour supply process, the complexity of adequately compensating human effort so that their survival is ensured is a problem that invites all manner of social, political and legal argumentation. Three recent books attempt to untangle this problem by visiting the intersection of antitrust, workers’ rights and algorithms. To specify, Acevedo (2020) takes on the issue of the rights of workers who work for platform companies; Posner (2021) looks at the inadequacies of antitrust laws in protecting workers’ rights, both in traditional and platform organisations; and Portuese (2022) highlights the technological hurdles of regulating platform companies via conventional antitrust legal precepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2023.2170864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2023.2170864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

算法时代改变了我们需求产品的方式和供应劳动力的方式。关于劳动力供应过程,充分补偿人类努力以确保其生存的复杂性是一个需要进行各种社会、政治和法律辩论的问题。最近的三本书试图通过访问反垄断、工人权利和算法的交叉点来解决这个问题。具体而言,Acevedo(2020)探讨了为平台公司工作的工人的权利问题;Posner(2021)研究了反垄断法在保护传统组织和平台组织中工人权利方面的不足;Portuese(2022)强调了通过传统反垄断法律规则监管平台公司的技术障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antitrust, workers’ rights and algorithms
The age of algorithms has changed both the way in which we demand products and the way in which we supply labour. In respect of the labour supply process, the complexity of adequately compensating human effort so that their survival is ensured is a problem that invites all manner of social, political and legal argumentation. Three recent books attempt to untangle this problem by visiting the intersection of antitrust, workers’ rights and algorithms. To specify, Acevedo (2020) takes on the issue of the rights of workers who work for platform companies; Posner (2021) looks at the inadequacies of antitrust laws in protecting workers’ rights, both in traditional and platform organisations; and Portuese (2022) highlights the technological hurdles of regulating platform companies via conventional antitrust legal precepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Livelihoods, work, women and climate change: women’s voice in just transition India’s informal economy: contractual labour in the formal manufacturing sector Industrial relations as power, place and time: the case of Queensland coal mining The value of work for doctors in Pakistan: towards a framework for ensuring decent work Teacher workload and the organisation of work: a research agenda for a post-pandemic future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1