阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者黄斑视觉功能的评估

Brughanya Subramanian, R. Asokan, Suganeswari Ganesan
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者黄斑视觉功能的评估","authors":"Brughanya Subramanian, R. Asokan, Suganeswari Ganesan","doi":"10.4103/jcor.jcor_26_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To study and compare the macular visual functions among the subjects with and without risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Methods: Prospective case–control study involving 20 cases and 17 controls. Subjects were classified as cases with the presence of snoring and controls in the absence of it. Cases were administered with a standardized Berlin Questionnaire and were grouped as high risk and low risk based on their scores. Color discrimination, contrast sensitivity, and photo stress recovery test were measured following a comprehensive eye examination. Body mass index and neck circumference were also measured. Results: There were 13 subjects in the high-risk category, 7 subjects in the low-risk category, and 17 subjects in the control group. The total error score in color discrimination was significantly different among high risk (112 ± 84.17), low risk (74 ± 43.98), and controls (56 ± 39.43) (P = 0.04) whereas, contrast sensitivity (P = 0.897), visual acuity (P = 0.95), and photo stress recovery test (P = 0.32) did not show any significant difference. Conclusion: High-risk category subjects showed poor color discrimination than controls hence, these individuals must undergo a detailed ophthalmic examination with a color discrimination test and must be evaluated in a sleep clinic.","PeriodicalId":33073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"163 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of macular visual functions in patients with risk for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Brughanya Subramanian, R. Asokan, Suganeswari Ganesan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcor.jcor_26_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To study and compare the macular visual functions among the subjects with and without risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Methods: Prospective case–control study involving 20 cases and 17 controls. Subjects were classified as cases with the presence of snoring and controls in the absence of it. Cases were administered with a standardized Berlin Questionnaire and were grouped as high risk and low risk based on their scores. Color discrimination, contrast sensitivity, and photo stress recovery test were measured following a comprehensive eye examination. Body mass index and neck circumference were also measured. Results: There were 13 subjects in the high-risk category, 7 subjects in the low-risk category, and 17 subjects in the control group. The total error score in color discrimination was significantly different among high risk (112 ± 84.17), low risk (74 ± 43.98), and controls (56 ± 39.43) (P = 0.04) whereas, contrast sensitivity (P = 0.897), visual acuity (P = 0.95), and photo stress recovery test (P = 0.32) did not show any significant difference. Conclusion: High-risk category subjects showed poor color discrimination than controls hence, these individuals must undergo a detailed ophthalmic examination with a color discrimination test and must be evaluated in a sleep clinic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"163 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcor.jcor_26_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcor.jcor_26_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究和比较有和无阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征风险受试者的黄斑视觉功能。方法:前瞻性病例-对照研究,纳入20例病例和17例对照。受试者被分为有打鼾的病例和没有打鼾的对照组。病例采用标准化的柏林问卷进行管理,并根据得分分为高风险和低风险。在全面的眼部检查后测量颜色辨别、对比敏感度和光应力恢复测试。同时测量了身体质量指数和颈围。结果:高危组13例,低危组7例,对照组17例。高危人群(112±84.17)、低危人群(74±43.98)和对照组(56±39.43)的辨色总误差评分差异有统计学意义(P = 0.04),而对比敏感度(P = 0.897)、视力(P = 0.95)、光应力恢复测试(P = 0.32)差异无统计学意义(P = 0.32)。结论:高危人群的辨色能力较对照组差,因此,这些人必须接受详细的眼科检查和辨色测试,并必须在睡眠诊所进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of macular visual functions in patients with risk for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
Purpose: To study and compare the macular visual functions among the subjects with and without risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Methods: Prospective case–control study involving 20 cases and 17 controls. Subjects were classified as cases with the presence of snoring and controls in the absence of it. Cases were administered with a standardized Berlin Questionnaire and were grouped as high risk and low risk based on their scores. Color discrimination, contrast sensitivity, and photo stress recovery test were measured following a comprehensive eye examination. Body mass index and neck circumference were also measured. Results: There were 13 subjects in the high-risk category, 7 subjects in the low-risk category, and 17 subjects in the control group. The total error score in color discrimination was significantly different among high risk (112 ± 84.17), low risk (74 ± 43.98), and controls (56 ± 39.43) (P = 0.04) whereas, contrast sensitivity (P = 0.897), visual acuity (P = 0.95), and photo stress recovery test (P = 0.32) did not show any significant difference. Conclusion: High-risk category subjects showed poor color discrimination than controls hence, these individuals must undergo a detailed ophthalmic examination with a color discrimination test and must be evaluated in a sleep clinic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 and Ocular Surface Disease Index in assessing dry eye symptoms Modulation transfer function and higher order aberrations with and without corneo scleral lens in an eye with keratoconus Typical cytomegalovirus retinitis in non-human immunodeficiency virus partially immunosuppressed patients: A case series To study visual evoked potential in patients with optic nerve diseases Corneal morphology following use of Malyugin versus B-hex pupil expansion rings in small pupil phacoemulsification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1