{"title":"关于在地方警察法院对上诉法院裁决的事实上诉的可受理性所遵循的程序中加入上诉的理由","authors":"Gonzalo Cortez Matcovich","doi":"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two contradictory judgments of the Supreme Court on the admissibility of adhesion to an appeal in a procedure before the Local Court Judge (Juzgado de Policial Local) regulated by Law No. 18,287 are critically analyzed. Likewise, the admissibility of a complaint appeal is analyzed with respect to the resolution of a Court of Appeals that declares an appeal inadmissible.","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sobre la procedencia de la adhesión a la apelación en el procedimiento seguido ante los juzgados de policía local Admisibilidad de un recurso de hecho respecto de resoluciones pronunciadas por una Corte de Apelaciones\",\"authors\":\"Gonzalo Cortez Matcovich\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two contradictory judgments of the Supreme Court on the admissibility of adhesion to an appeal in a procedure before the Local Court Judge (Juzgado de Policial Local) regulated by Law No. 18,287 are critically analyzed. Likewise, the admissibility of a complaint appeal is analyzed with respect to the resolution of a Court of Appeals that declares an appeal inadmissible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sobre la procedencia de la adhesión a la apelación en el procedimiento seguido ante los juzgados de policía local Admisibilidad de un recurso de hecho respecto de resoluciones pronunciadas por una Corte de Apelaciones
Two contradictory judgments of the Supreme Court on the admissibility of adhesion to an appeal in a procedure before the Local Court Judge (Juzgado de Policial Local) regulated by Law No. 18,287 are critically analyzed. Likewise, the admissibility of a complaint appeal is analyzed with respect to the resolution of a Court of Appeals that declares an appeal inadmissible.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
