日托中心持证护理人员对老年人身体限制的相关因素

Song-iee Hong, S. Park
{"title":"日托中心持证护理人员对老年人身体限制的相关因素","authors":"Song-iee Hong, S. Park","doi":"10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.3.355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the National Long-Term Care Insurance of 2008, licensed caregivers for older adults have dramatically increased in Korea. In contrast to such trends, their care capacity has been socially concerned about violation against human rights such as elder abuse including physical restraints. The distinction between physical restraints and physical abuse is ambiguous at care settings which has brought in hot debate on the violation of human rights. Therefore, we investigated the extent to which caregivers’awareness of physical restraints and reasons of elder abuse and their witness of physical restraints are associated with their physical restraints on older adults. We used the secondary data collected from 3,859 licensed caregivers working at about 3,000 day care centers across the nation in 2017. First, we found that 10.7% of caregivers performed restrictive interventions. Second, the awareness of physical restraints, witness of others’physical restraints, and their own physical restraints are related to each other. Lastly, logistic regressions confirmed that caregivers’poor awareness of physical restraints, more witness of physical restraints by other caregivers, and higher perception of victim’s personality problems mainly causing elder abuse were more likely to increase their use of physical restraints. These findings suggest that care environment insensitive to human rights might lead to elder abuse by over-utilizing physical restraints. Also, it is fundamental to develop professional care culture of licensed caregivers towards person-centered care.","PeriodicalId":90513,"journal":{"name":"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with Older Adults’ Physical Restraints by Licensed Caregivers Working at Day Care Centers\",\"authors\":\"Song-iee Hong, S. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.3.355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the National Long-Term Care Insurance of 2008, licensed caregivers for older adults have dramatically increased in Korea. In contrast to such trends, their care capacity has been socially concerned about violation against human rights such as elder abuse including physical restraints. The distinction between physical restraints and physical abuse is ambiguous at care settings which has brought in hot debate on the violation of human rights. Therefore, we investigated the extent to which caregivers’awareness of physical restraints and reasons of elder abuse and their witness of physical restraints are associated with their physical restraints on older adults. We used the secondary data collected from 3,859 licensed caregivers working at about 3,000 day care centers across the nation in 2017. First, we found that 10.7% of caregivers performed restrictive interventions. Second, the awareness of physical restraints, witness of others’physical restraints, and their own physical restraints are related to each other. Lastly, logistic regressions confirmed that caregivers’poor awareness of physical restraints, more witness of physical restraints by other caregivers, and higher perception of victim’s personality problems mainly causing elder abuse were more likely to increase their use of physical restraints. These findings suggest that care environment insensitive to human rights might lead to elder abuse by over-utilizing physical restraints. Also, it is fundamental to develop professional care culture of licensed caregivers towards person-centered care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.3.355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.3.355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2008年实施国民长期护理保险以来,韩国的持证老年人护理人员大幅增加。与这种趋势相反,他们的护理能力一直受到社会对侵犯人权行为的关注,例如虐待老年人,包括身体限制。在护理环境中,身体限制和身体虐待之间的区别是模糊的,这引起了关于侵犯人权的激烈辩论。因此,我们调查了照顾者对身体约束的认知程度、虐待老人的原因以及他们对身体约束的见证与他们对老年人的身体约束之间的关系。我们使用了2017年从全国约3000个日托中心工作的3859名持牌护理人员收集的二次数据。首先,我们发现10.7%的护理人员采取了限制性干预措施。二是身体约束意识、他人身体约束见证、自身身体约束相互关联。最后,logistic回归分析证实,照顾者对身体约束的认知较差、其他照顾者对身体约束的目击较多、以及对受害者人格问题的认知较高,更有可能增加对老年人的身体约束使用。这些研究结果表明,对人权不敏感的护理环境可能会导致过度使用身体约束的老年人虐待。同时,以人为本的专业护理文化是发展持牌护理人员专业护理文化的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors Associated with Older Adults’ Physical Restraints by Licensed Caregivers Working at Day Care Centers
Since the National Long-Term Care Insurance of 2008, licensed caregivers for older adults have dramatically increased in Korea. In contrast to such trends, their care capacity has been socially concerned about violation against human rights such as elder abuse including physical restraints. The distinction between physical restraints and physical abuse is ambiguous at care settings which has brought in hot debate on the violation of human rights. Therefore, we investigated the extent to which caregivers’awareness of physical restraints and reasons of elder abuse and their witness of physical restraints are associated with their physical restraints on older adults. We used the secondary data collected from 3,859 licensed caregivers working at about 3,000 day care centers across the nation in 2017. First, we found that 10.7% of caregivers performed restrictive interventions. Second, the awareness of physical restraints, witness of others’physical restraints, and their own physical restraints are related to each other. Lastly, logistic regressions confirmed that caregivers’poor awareness of physical restraints, more witness of physical restraints by other caregivers, and higher perception of victim’s personality problems mainly causing elder abuse were more likely to increase their use of physical restraints. These findings suggest that care environment insensitive to human rights might lead to elder abuse by over-utilizing physical restraints. Also, it is fundamental to develop professional care culture of licensed caregivers towards person-centered care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Support Expectation and Policy Trust on Anxiety about Aging among the Middle-Aged: Focusing on Mediating Effect of Preparation for Old Age The Effect of the Characteristics of Users of Personalized Care Services for the Elderly on Life Satisfaction Caring for Older Adults: The Effects of Gratitude and Support in Family Caregivers' Care Burden-Distress Relationship The Effect of the Residential Environment of the Elderly on Aging in Place: Focusing on Comparison of Regions The Relationship between Nutritional Status and Depression in the Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment Group: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Social Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1